【摘要】：我國(guó)沒(méi)有專門(mén)的法律對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制加以規(guī)范,導(dǎo)致網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制的制度設(shè)計(jì)和運(yùn)行無(wú)法可依。司法解釋和法條對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制的規(guī)定較少。而我國(guó)作為世界上網(wǎng)民人數(shù)最多的國(guó)家,網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制的施行需要一整套完整的合乎國(guó)情的法規(guī)才能得以順利運(yùn)行。同時(shí)網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制運(yùn)行過(guò)程中產(chǎn)生的問(wèn)題也需要法律加以規(guī)定才能在司法實(shí)踐中運(yùn)用。我國(guó)法律和司法解釋只規(guī)定了特定人或者特定領(lǐng)域的實(shí)名制。因而我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的法律中只能為一小部分人或者極少數(shù)網(wǎng)絡(luò)案件提供法律保護(hù)。在現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬性帶來(lái)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件時(shí)有發(fā)生,要更好的發(fā)揮網(wǎng)絡(luò)的優(yōu)勢(shì)并營(yíng)造良好的網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境就需要從立法角度為實(shí)名制的推行提供法律依據(jù)。首先,網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制的制度設(shè)計(jì)一方面可采取有限實(shí)名制,即網(wǎng)絡(luò)使用者在瀏覽網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)真實(shí)的個(gè)人信息僅在服務(wù)商的后臺(tái)系統(tǒng)顯示,在前臺(tái)系統(tǒng)中依然匿名。另一方面還需要總結(jié)實(shí)行網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制國(guó)家的立法和實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn),從網(wǎng)民的切身利益出發(fā)來(lái)規(guī)范網(wǎng)絡(luò)主體的行為。同時(shí)網(wǎng)絡(luò)主體與政府通過(guò)自律與他律的雙重機(jī)制來(lái)規(guī)范網(wǎng)絡(luò)秩序,營(yíng)造和諧的網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境。其次,網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制下產(chǎn)生的網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)問(wèn)題需合理分配侵權(quán)行為人和網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商的責(zé)任。由侵權(quán)行為實(shí)施者承擔(dān)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任,網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商承擔(dān)有限責(zé)任。最后,在網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件遭遇執(zhí)行難時(shí),建立民間基金對(duì)案件中被侵權(quán)人的財(cái)產(chǎn)損失進(jìn)行救濟(jì)。并通過(guò)加強(qiáng)與其他國(guó)家的司法合作保障案件得以順利解決。
[Abstract]:Our country does not have the special law to regulate the network real name system, resulting in the system design and operation of the network real name system can not be followed. The judicial explanation and the law article to the network real name system stipulation is less. However, as the country with the largest number of Internet users in the world, the implementation of the network real name system requires a complete set of laws and regulations in line with the national conditions to run smoothly. At the same time, the problems arising in the operation of network real name system also need to be stipulated by law to be applied in judicial practice. The law and judicial interpretation of our country only stipulate the real name system of specific person or field. Therefore, the current law of our country can only provide legal protection for a small number of people or a very small number of network cases. In real life, the network infringement cases caused by the virtual nature of the network occur from time to time. In order to better play the advantages of the network and create a good network environment, it is necessary to provide the legal basis for the implementation of the real-name system from the legislative point of view. First of all, the system design of network real name system can adopt the limited real name system on the one hand, that is, the real personal information of network users only shows in the background system of the service provider while browsing the network, and it is still anonymous in the front desk system. On the other hand, it is necessary to sum up the legislative and practical experience of the countries carrying out the network real name system, and to standardize the behavior of the network subject from the view of the vital interests of the Internet users. At the same time, the network subject and government regulate the network order and create a harmonious network environment through the dual mechanism of self-discipline and heteronomy. Secondly, the network torts arising under the real name system need to distribute the responsibility of tortfeasors and network service providers reasonably. The tortfeasor bears the fault liability, the network service provider assumes the limited liability. Finally, when the network infringement case is difficult to execute, the private fund is established to remedy the property loss of the infringer in the case. And through strengthening judicial cooperation with other countries to ensure the smooth resolution of cases.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.16

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高鋼;;物聯(lián)網(wǎng)和Web3.0:技術(shù)革命與社會(huì)變革的交疊演進(jìn)[J];國(guó)際新聞界;2010年02期

2 魏玲;;淺論網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制與憲法言論自由[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年03期

3 于沖;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗行為的實(shí)證分析與刑法應(yīng)對(duì)——以10年來(lái)100個(gè)網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗案例為樣本[J];法學(xué);2013年07期

4 齊恩平;;實(shí)名制政策與私權(quán)保護(hù)的博弈論[J];法學(xué)雜志;2013年07期

5 馬艷華;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制相關(guān)法律問(wèn)題探析[J];河北法學(xué);2011年02期

6 周永坤;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制立法評(píng)析[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年02期

7 庹繼光;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息保護(hù)決定中的權(quán)利本位沖突及其平衡——以網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐信息作為考察對(duì)象[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);2013年07期

8 高榮林;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制可行性探討[J];前沿;2010年15期

9 金山;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)個(gè)人信息侵權(quán)問(wèn)題探析[J];青年記者;2010年07期

10 馮慧;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)者對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)用戶行為的事后審查義務(wù)[J];人民司法;2013年12期

，

本文編號(hào)：2155599