本文選題：上下班途中工傷 + 工傷保險�。� 參考：《華東政法大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文以社會法的視角探究上下班途中工傷法律制度，致力于回答法律應(yīng)當如何調(diào)整上下班途中工傷的核心問題。為了解決這一問題，第一章將首先梳理和總結(jié)從1996年《企業(yè)職工工傷保險試行辦法》起,到2010年頒布的新版《工傷保險條例》為止的，我國行政法規(guī)與部門規(guī)章中的上下班途中工傷制度的立法演變歷程，以及這些演變背后的現(xiàn)實考量與學術(shù)爭議。然后，對上下班途中工傷的工傷屬性、上下班途中工傷中勞動者的過錯歸責、交強險與工傷保險保障范圍的競合、上下班途中工傷的事故類型限制等學界爭議的焦點問題進行逐一論述，闡明和分析各方觀點，并給出作者的意見。在此基礎(chǔ)上，文章的第二章將跳出學界在研究上下班途中工傷問題時的公法思路、公法邏輯，從社會法的視野重新審視相關(guān)問題，并結(jié)合社會法相關(guān)理論明確上下班途中工傷法律制度的社會法屬性。然后，根據(jù)社會法的三層次調(diào)整模式，嘗試構(gòu)架上下班途中工傷法律制度應(yīng)有的基準法、集體協(xié)議、勞動合同三層次的調(diào)整模式；闡述基準法規(guī)定上下班途中工傷構(gòu)成要件和保障標準，，再由工會、勞動者和雇主約定上下班路線與時間等細節(jié)的調(diào)整方式；明確基準法層面上下班途中工傷應(yīng)有的認定標準、構(gòu)成要件和限制性規(guī)定。通過對這些問題的研究，第二章可以回答以社會法的視角，法律應(yīng)當如何構(gòu)建調(diào)整上下班途中工傷的法律體系的問題。第三章研究在上下班途中工傷事故是由第三人侵權(quán)行為造成的情況下，工傷者可以請求的工傷保險待遇和第三人侵權(quán)賠償競合的問題。通過討論處理工傷待遇與第三人侵權(quán)賠償競合的四種模式的選擇、競合雙方主次責任之分、受害人雙重索賠的限制等問題，回答工傷保險基金在上下班途中工傷賠償中應(yīng)當承擔怎樣的責任的問題。最后，本文的第四章將結(jié)合上文的研究結(jié)論，為我國相關(guān)法律法規(guī)的進一步完善，提出了修訂現(xiàn)行上下班途中工傷制度關(guān)于勞動者過錯歸責的規(guī)定、進一步明確工傷保險基金向第三人追償?shù)臋?quán)利等合理化建議，糾正現(xiàn)行法規(guī)的誤區(qū)，呼吁我國社會保險立法回歸社會本位，為保護勞動者合法權(quán)益和構(gòu)建和諧勞動關(guān)系做出貢獻。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of social law, this paper probes into the legal system of work-related injuries on the way to and from work, and devotes itself to answering the core question of how the law should adjust the work-related injuries on the way to and from work. In order to solve this problem, the first chapter will first sort out and sum up the new edition of the regulations on Industrial injury Insurance promulgated in 2010 from the 1996 "trial measures on Industrial injury Insurance for Enterprise employees". The legislative evolution of the work injury system during commuting to and from work in China's administrative regulations and departmental regulations, as well as the realistic considerations and academic disputes behind these changes. Then, as to the attribute of industrial injury on the way to and from work, the blame of the worker's fault in the work-related injury on the way to and from work, the competition between the strong traffic insurance and the scope of the industrial injury insurance, In this paper, the author's opinions are discussed one by one on the basis of the limitation of the types of work-related injuries on the way to and from work. On this basis, the second chapter of the article will jump out of the academic research work injury on the way of public law, public law logic, from the perspective of social law to re-examine the relevant issues. Combined with the relevant theory of social law to clarify the legal system of work-related injuries on the way to work the attributes of social law. Then, according to the three-level adjustment model of social law, this paper tries to set up the adjustment mode of the standard law, collective agreement and labor contract in the legal system of work-related injury on the way to and from work. The basic Law stipulates the constitutive requirements and protection standards of work-related injuries on the way to and from work, and then the labor unions, workers and employers agree on the ways to adjust the details of the commuting route and time, and make clear the standards for the determination of work-related injuries due to the work injury during the commuting to and from work in the basic Law, Constituent elements and restrictive provisions. Through the study of these questions, the second chapter can answer the question of how the law should construct the legal system to adjust the work-related injuries during the commute from the perspective of social law. In the third chapter, the author studies the problem of the compensation of the third party's tort and the compensation of the third party's tort. In the case of the injury accident caused by the third party's tort during the commuting to and from work, the compensation of the injury insurance and the compensation of the third party's tort can be claimed. By discussing the choice of four modes of dealing with the competing compensation for injury at work and the tort compensation of the third party, the selection of the primary and secondary responsibilities of the two parties, the limitation of the double claim of the victim, etc., Answer the question of what kind of liability the Industrial injury Insurance Fund should bear in the compensation for injuries on the way to and from work. Finally, the fourth chapter of this article will combine the above research conclusion, for the further improvement of the relevant laws and regulations of our country, proposed the revision of the current commuting work injury system on the liability of workers fault provisions, To further clarify the rationalization of the right of the industrial injury insurance fund to claim compensation from the third party, to correct the misunderstanding of the existing laws and regulations, and to call on our social insurance legislation to return to the social standard. To protect the legitimate rights and interests of workers and build harmonious labor relations to make contributions.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.55

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳麗萍;;對我國“途中工傷”條款存廢的探討[J];當代法學;2010年05期

2 董保華;;《工傷保險條例》修改的若干思考[J];東方法學;2009年05期

3 李坤剛;;工傷補償制度:起源、問題與解決[J];法律科學(西北政法學院學報);2007年06期

4 張平華;郭明瑞;;關(guān)于工傷保險賠償與侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)年P(guān)系[J];法律適用;2008年10期

5 梁三利;;取消職工上下班途中事故傷害工傷認定應(yīng)慎行[J];法學;2009年11期

6 李海明;鄭尚元;;通勤事故損害賠償解釋論[J];法治研究;2010年05期

7 于欣華;;熱烈與冷靜——2000—2009十年工傷保險補償與民事侵權(quán)賠償競合研究綜述[J];河北法學;2011年03期

8 周開暢;社會法視角中的“工傷保險和民事賠償”適用關(guān)系[J];華東政法學院學報;2003年06期

9 李培志;職工上下班途中的風險與工傷認定[J];中國勞動;2005年11期

10 陳碧賢;;工傷認定之實質(zhì)性標準初探——兼論幾種特殊工傷的認定[J];中國勞動;2006年08期

本文編號：2114140