本文選題：代孕行為 + 法律規(guī)制�。� 參考：《廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：代孕作為人類輔助生殖技術(shù)之一,可以解決部分不孕不育問題,實(shí)現(xiàn)不孕夫婦生兒育女的愿望。但由于代孕技術(shù)會(huì)對(duì)傳統(tǒng)公序良俗原則造成不利影響,我國對(duì)其采取了全面禁止的態(tài)度。然而在司法實(shí)踐中,代孕行為卻禁而不止,主要是因?yàn)榇屑夹g(shù)具有巨大的社會(huì)需求。這種立法與實(shí)踐的偏差,導(dǎo)致了代孕市場的混亂以及法律規(guī)則上的困難。由于代孕技術(shù)是一個(gè)十分復(fù)雜的人類輔助生育技術(shù)手段,涉及諸多的醫(yī)學(xué)名詞與技術(shù)。文章力圖圍繞主要的法律問題來進(jìn)行探討,因此刻意回避了代孕技術(shù)本身的醫(yī)學(xué)復(fù)雜性。為此,文章以規(guī)制代孕行為為主要寫作目的,并以實(shí)事求是、科學(xué)嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)?shù)膽B(tài)度來回應(yīng)現(xiàn)實(shí)中出現(xiàn)的實(shí)際問題。同時(shí),基于中共十七大報(bào)告以及近期王利明教授對(duì)于“人文關(guān)懷”的闡釋,我們認(rèn)為對(duì)于代孕行為也應(yīng)當(dāng)給予更多的理解與支持,采取有限開放的模式。因此,文章選擇在人文關(guān)懷的視角下來審視代孕行為的法律規(guī)制。本文除引言和后記外,共分為四章。第一章從法律規(guī)制的角度,提出了代孕行為的概念和類型,以及對(duì)其進(jìn)行規(guī)制的必要性。第二章介紹我國規(guī)制代孕行為的法律規(guī)定和實(shí)踐效果的現(xiàn)狀及不足。第三章比較國外關(guān)于代孕行為的三種法律規(guī)制模式,并指出有限開放代孕的合理性。第四章分析代孕行為法律規(guī)制模式重構(gòu)中存在的核心問題,并設(shè)想了可行的解決途徑。
[Abstract]:Surrogacy, as one of human assisted reproductive technology, can solve some infertility problems and realize the desire of infertile couples to have children. However, surrogacy technology will have a negative impact on the traditional public order and good customs, so our country has taken an all-out ban on it. However, surrogacy is prohibited in judicial practice, mainly because surrogacy has great social demand. The deviation between legislation and practice leads to confusion in surrogacy market and difficulties in legal rules. Surrogate technology is a very complicated means of assisted human fertility, involving many medical terms and techniques. The article tries to discuss the main legal problems, so it avoids the medical complexity of surrogacy. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to regulate surrogacy, and to respond to the practical problems with the attitude of seeking truth from facts and scientific preciseness. At the same time, based on the report of the 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China and professor Wang Liming's explanation of "humanistic care", we believe that surrogacy should also be understood and supported more and adopt a limited open mode. Therefore, the article chooses to examine the legal regulation of surrogacy from the perspective of humanistic care. In addition to the introduction and postscript, this article is divided into four chapters. The first chapter puts forward the concept and type of surrogacy from the angle of legal regulation and the necessity of regulating it. The second chapter introduces the current situation and deficiency of the regulation of surrogacy in China. The third chapter compares the three modes of legal regulation about surrogacy in foreign countries, and points out the rationality of limited open surrogacy. Chapter four analyzes the core problems in the reconstruction of legal regulation mode of surrogacy, and conceives the feasible ways to solve it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D922.16

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張仲健;趙紅巧;;關(guān)于代孕糾紛法律問題與代孕制度構(gòu)建的思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2014年05期

2 任巍;王倩;;我國代孕的合法化及其邊界研究[J];河北法學(xué);2014年02期

3 劉長秋;;代孕的行政規(guī)制模式研究[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2013年04期

4 劉長秋;;臺(tái)灣人工生殖立法研究[J];法治研究;2012年06期

5 林玲;黃霞;;非傳統(tǒng)生育的合法性和制度構(gòu)建——以代孕為例[J];人民論壇;2011年29期

6 任汝平;唐華琳;;“代孕”的法律困境及其破解[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年07期

7 王貴松;;中國代孕規(guī)制的模式選擇[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2009年04期

8 許麗琴;;代孕生育合理控制與使用的法律規(guī)制[J];河北法學(xué);2009年07期

9 潘榮華;楊芳;;英國“代孕”合法化二十年歷史回顧[J];醫(yī)學(xué)與哲學(xué)(人文社會(huì)醫(yī)學(xué)版);2006年11期

10 張燕玲;;論代孕母的合法化基礎(chǔ)[J];河北法學(xué);2006年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1913219