本文選題：責(zé)任主體 + 認定標準��； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：從20世紀開始以來的世界各國機動車損害賠償?shù)牧⒎òl(fā)展歷程來看，有關(guān)機動車交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體研究一直是非常重要的問題，也是令立法者頗感頭疼的問題。改革開放后，伴隨隨著我國社會主義市場經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展，消費者購買機動車能力的提高導(dǎo)致機動車增加率與日俱增，同時由于機動車的交通事故而給廣大的人民造成了巨大的人身傷害和財產(chǎn)損失，由此引發(fā)的機動車交通事故損害賠償糾紛已經(jīng)成為急需解決的嚴重的社會問題。在機動車交通事故損害賠償中，責(zé)任主體的認定呈現(xiàn)出多樣性與復(fù)雜性的特點。在實踐中，對機動車享有使用權(quán)、支配權(quán)和收益權(quán)的人員范圍非常廣泛，賠償責(zé)任主體既可以是機動車的登記所有人或?qū)嶋H管理人，也可以是機動車的質(zhì)權(quán)人、承租人、借用人、掛靠人，個別情況下還有可能是搶劫者、盜車者等等。同時在交通事故中受到傷害的往往是自然人，屬于相對弱勢群體，為了保證受害人得到更好、更快捷的救濟，我們必須厘清不同法律關(guān)系中的賠償責(zé)任主體。目前在中國，關(guān)于機動車交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體的立法規(guī)定混亂，各地方的司法實踐做法也不統(tǒng)一，這給司法實務(wù)帶來了巨大的困難。本文旨對機動車交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體的一些理論問題予以探討，著重討論了目前在理論界居于主導(dǎo)地位的運行支配和運行收益理論，并對實踐中比較特殊的損害賠償責(zé)任主體認定的情況進行類型化分析。本文除引言部分，共分為四章。 引言部分:主要闡明機動車交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體認定的法律意義。 第一章：機動車交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體概述 本章主要是探討了機動車交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體的概念。同時對機動車交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體與道路交通事故責(zé)任主體的概念進行了區(qū)分 第二章：機動車交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體的認定標準及歸責(zé)原則 有關(guān)交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體的認定標準，，在理論上有三種責(zé)任根據(jù)：危險分擔理論、報償責(zé)任理論、危險責(zé)任理論。在歸責(zé)原則方面不但介紹了歸責(zé)原則的歷史變革，還闡釋了不同學(xué)者關(guān)于此問題的觀點。主要有無過錯責(zé)任說、過錯責(zé)任說和混合歸責(zé)原則說。 第三章我國有關(guān)機動車交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體的立法現(xiàn)狀 介紹《民法通則》、《道路交通事故處理辦法》、《道路交通安全法》、《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》、《合同法》等法律、法規(guī)的機動車交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體的相關(guān)規(guī)定。 第四章：機動車交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體的類型化研究 正因為現(xiàn)在社會關(guān)系日趨復(fù)雜，因此導(dǎo)致機動車交通事故損害賠償案件的責(zé)任主體問題具有復(fù)雜性和廣泛性的特點。限于篇幅有限，在文章的第四部分，介紹了八種特殊類型的機動車交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體主要包括：1、未轉(zhuǎn)移機動車所有權(quán)登記情形；2、分期付款買賣情形；3、掛靠、承包關(guān)系情形；4、出租、出借、融資租賃情形；5、質(zhì)權(quán)、保管情形；6、被盜用車輛發(fā)生交通事故情形；7、好意同乘情形；8、雇傭關(guān)系情形。這八種情況也是社會生活經(jīng)常出現(xiàn)的。
[Abstract]:From the legislative development of motor vehicle damage compensation in the world since twentieth Century, it is very important to study the subject of compensation liability for motor vehicle accidents, and it is also a headache for the legislator. After the reform and opening up, with the development of the socialist market economy in China, consumers buy it. The increase of motor vehicle capacity leads to the increasing rate of motor vehicle increase. At the same time, because of the traffic accidents of motor vehicles, it has caused great personal injury and property loss to the masses of the people. Thus the compensation dispute of motor vehicle traffic accident damage has become a serious social problem that needs to be solved urgently. The damage to motor vehicle accidents is damaged. In the indemnity, the identification of the subject of responsibility presents the characteristics of diversity and complexity. In practice, the right to use the motor vehicle, the right to control and the right of income is very wide. The main body of the liability can be a registered owner or a real manager of a motor vehicle, or a pledge of a motor vehicle, a lessee, a borrower, and a person. People, in individual cases, may be robbers, car robbers and so on. At the same time, in traffic accidents are often hurt by natural people, belonging to relatively vulnerable groups. In order to ensure that the victims get better and faster relief, we must clarify the compensation liability subject in different legal relations. At present, in China, about motor vehicle traffic affairs. Therefore, the legislative provisions of the main body of liability for damages are confused and the judicial practice in various places is not unified. This brings great difficulties to the judicial practice. This paper aims to discuss some theoretical problems of the main body of liability for damage compensation for motor vehicle accidents, and emphatically discusses the dominant position and transport in the theoretical circles at present. In line with the introduction of the theory of revenue, the article makes a typological analysis of the special cases of liability identification of damages. In addition to the introduction, this article is divided into four chapters.
Introduction: it mainly expounds the legal significance of determining the liability of motor vehicle traffic accident damages.
Chapter 1: overview of liability for motor vehicle traffic accident damages
This chapter mainly discusses the concept of the main body of liability for vehicle traffic accident damage compensation, and also makes a distinction between the main body of compensation liability for motor vehicle accident damage and the concept of road traffic accident liability subject.
The second chapter: the identification standard and the liability principle of the liability subject of motor vehicle traffic accident damages.
The criteria for determining the liability subject of liability for traffic accident damage have three kinds of responsibility in theory: the theory of risk sharing, the theory of liability for compensation, the theory of dangerous responsibility. In the principle of imputation, it not only introduces the historical changes of the principle of imputation, but also explains the views of different scholars on this issue. The doctrine of responsibility and the principle of mixed liability.
The third chapter is about the legislative status of the liability subject of motor vehicle traffic accident damages in China.
Introduce the general rules of the civil law, the road traffic accident treatment, the road traffic safety law, the tort liability law, the contract law, and other laws and regulations, and the relevant provisions of the main body of liability for motor vehicle accident damage compensation.
The fourth chapter: the classification of liability subject of motor vehicle traffic accident damages.
Because the social relations are becoming more and more complicated now, the subject of liability subject to the compensation cases of motor vehicle accident damages has the characteristics of complexity and universality. Limited to the limited space, in the fourth part of the article, the main body of compensation for eight special types of vehicle traffic accident damage mainly include: 1, the non transfer machine. Car ownership registration situation; 2, the instalment sale situation; 3, affiliation, contract relationship situation; 4, rent, loan, financial leasing situation; 5, the pledge, the custody situation; 6, the stolen vehicle accident situation; 7, the good intention and the same situation; 8, employment relations. These eight cases are also the social life often appears.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D922.14;D923

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 梁慧星;關(guān)于中國道路交通事故賠償?shù)姆芍贫萚J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報;1995年06期

2 趙相昌;;談交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體及范圍的確立[J];安陽工學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年02期

3 溫文治,辛軍;道路交通事故機動車一方損害賠償責(zé)任主體的探討[J];江蘇技術(shù)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年01期

4 劉曉紅;機動車交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體的認定基準研究[J];當代法學(xué);2003年01期

5 楊立新;;法官適用《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》應(yīng)當著重把握的幾個問題[J];法律適用;2010年Z1期

6 寧樂然;;論交通事故責(zé)任與交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任的辯證關(guān)系[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年04期

7 龔鵬飛;;交通事故責(zé)任與交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年01期

8 劉星;李靜芹;;機動車道路交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體的認定[J];河北法學(xué);2006年06期

9 馮建妹;交通事故損害賠償立法構(gòu)想[J];江海學(xué)刊;1994年03期

10 程嘯;;機動車損害賠償責(zé)任主體研究[J];法學(xué)研究;2006年04期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 □ 中國人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院教授、博士生導(dǎo)師 張新寶 □ 北京市朝陽區(qū)法院副院長 魯桂華;[N];人民法院報;2004年

2 黃存智;[N];人民法院報;2000年

本文編號：1818843