本文選題：土地發(fā)展權(quán) + 農(nóng)村集體土地發(fā)展權(quán)�。� 參考：《甘肅政法學(xué)院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：土地是人類賴以生存的最重要資源,是一切生產(chǎn)和一切存在的源泉①。自古以來,關(guān)于土地的開發(fā)及利用,等等制度構(gòu)建和運(yùn)行,便始終與社會安寧及發(fā)展緊緊相連,同時與社會的興衰和人民的福祉息息相關(guān)②。隨著城市化進(jìn)程的快速推進(jìn)和社會主義市場經(jīng)濟(jì)體制的逐步建立,我國的土地制度也在不斷深入發(fā)展。從早期的農(nóng)村承包經(jīng)營與國有土地有償使用到城鎮(zhèn)國有土地使用權(quán)出讓、轉(zhuǎn)讓,再到現(xiàn)在的土地征收、集體建設(shè)用地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)等等都表現(xiàn)出我國在土地發(fā)展過程中,對土地產(chǎn)權(quán)的界定不斷明晰深化。改革開放的縱深發(fā)展,人們對權(quán)利意識逐步增強(qiáng),關(guān)于土地發(fā)展權(quán)問題的研究也更加深入。然而,現(xiàn)行的土地制度很難解決實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的社會問題。且我國正處于城鎮(zhèn)化快速推進(jìn)的關(guān)鍵時期,與此同時,耕地資源和農(nóng)村集體土地的發(fā)展與保護(hù)之形勢也非常嚴(yán)峻,農(nóng)村集體與城市化的矛盾也日益突出。近年來,我國因農(nóng)村集體土地拆遷及征收而引起的社會問題不斷,農(nóng)村社會矛盾尤為突出。在城市化的開發(fā)和利用過程中,農(nóng)村集體土地的增值利益也日趨明顯,因此,就土地利益的爭奪也最為激烈。當(dāng)下,尤其是農(nóng)村集體土地帶來經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展而產(chǎn)生的巨大利益如何分配、權(quán)利如何行使等一系列由土地引發(fā)的社會問題頻頻發(fā)生。十八屆三中全會對土地問題也提出了改革,改革的重點(diǎn)就是要建立土地市場。因此,諸多的土地問題必須通過土地權(quán)利制度的細(xì)分予以解決,通過農(nóng)村集體土地發(fā)展權(quán)制度的創(chuàng)新尋找行之有效的解決方案；否則,只能是個案分析的解決方法,這樣不僅不利益土地利用的有序進(jìn)行,更容易造成社會的不公平。
[Abstract]:Land is the most important resource for human survival and the source of all production and existence.Since ancient times, the development and utilization of land, and so on system construction and operation, has always been closely linked with social tranquillity and development, and with the rise and fall of society and the well-being of the people. 2.With the rapid development of urbanization and the establishment of socialist market economy system, the land system of our country is developing deeply.From the early rural contracted management and the paid use of state-owned land to the transfer and transfer of the right to use state-owned land in cities and towns, to the present land expropriation, the circulation of the right to use collective construction land, and so on, all of these show that our country is in the process of land development.The definition of land property rights is becoming more and more clear and deepened.With the deepening development of reform and opening up, people's consciousness of right has been gradually strengthened, and the research on land development right has also been deepened.However, the current land system is difficult to solve the social problems in practice.At the same time, the development and protection of cultivated land resources and rural collective land is also very severe, and the contradiction between rural collective and urbanization is increasingly prominent.In recent years, the social problems caused by the demolition and expropriation of rural collective land in our country are unceasing, especially in rural areas.In the process of development and utilization of urbanization, the value-added benefits of rural collective land are becoming more and more obvious, therefore, the competition for land interests is also the most fierce.At present, a series of social problems caused by land occur frequently, such as how to distribute the huge benefits and how to exercise the rights caused by the economic development brought by the rural collective land.The third Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee also proposed a reform on land issues, the focus of which is to establish a land market.Therefore, many land problems must be solved through the subdivision of land rights system, and through the innovation of rural collective land development right system to find effective solutions; otherwise, it can only be the solution of case analysis.This not only does not benefit the order of land use, it is easy to cause social injustice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：甘肅政法學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.32

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉國臻;;論我國土地發(fā)展權(quán)的法律性質(zhì)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年03期

2 劉國臻;;論美國的土地發(fā)展權(quán)制度及其對我國的啟示[J];法學(xué)評論;2007年03期

3 劉國臻;;論英國土地發(fā)展權(quán)制度及其對我國的啟示[J];法學(xué)評論;2008年04期

4 王茂輝;;當(dāng)前農(nóng)民土地財產(chǎn)權(quán)體系重構(gòu)之探討——以基本人權(quán)為視角[J];甘肅行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年06期

5 劉國臻;;論我國設(shè)置土地發(fā)展權(quán)的必要性和可行性[J];河北法學(xué);2008年08期

6 陳名村;孫穎;;美國土地發(fā)展權(quán)制度對我國的借鑒意義[J];決策與信息(財經(jīng)觀察);2008年08期

7 高潔;廖長林;;英、美、法土地發(fā)展權(quán)制度對我國土地管理制度改革的啟示[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)社會體制比較;2011年04期

8 黃祖輝,汪暉;非公共利益性質(zhì)的征地行為與土地發(fā)展權(quán)補(bǔ)償[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2002年05期

9 張千帆;“公正補(bǔ)償”與征收權(quán)的憲法限制[J];法學(xué)研究;2005年02期

10 易繼明;;財產(chǎn)權(quán)的三維價值——論財產(chǎn)之于人生的幸福[J];法學(xué)研究;2011年04期

，

本文編號：1736061