本文選題：行政規(guī)范性文件變更　切入點：合法預期保護　出處：《湖北大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在我國當前轉(zhuǎn)型時期,上位法律規(guī)范的變更因客觀情況的變化致使行政規(guī)范性文件有時常發(fā)生變更的必要。而一旦發(fā)生變更,如何面對未變更之前公民對舊有法律秩序的信任以及因信任而采取的行動,同時,若行政法律規(guī)范文件隨意變更,則極易造成公民因信賴先前行政規(guī)定而有所作為但卻遭致無法預見損害的不利后果。這個問題具有現(xiàn)實性,一方面根據(jù)客觀情況的變化,行政機關為了有效率執(zhí)行變更后的政策不得不變更原有的規(guī)范性文件；但另一方面,相對人的合法預期又會受到潛在的威脅,而法律必須兼顧到相對人的利益對其進行保護。這使得二者之間不可避免地發(fā)生了生了沖突。這實質(zhì)上體現(xiàn)了我國在改革發(fā)展中如何協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展和穩(wěn)定的關系。這個問題在法學上則體現(xiàn)為如何在合法預期保護原則和行政機關變更規(guī)范性文件的自由裁量上尋求一個平衡的問題。因此把行政規(guī)范性文件變更下如何為公民提供合法預期保護作為本文的重點。本文分為四個部分： 第一部分開篇介紹了何謂行政規(guī)范性文件以及它的性質(zhì)和法律效力,然后論述行政規(guī)范性文件變更的含義以及從立法學的角度將行政規(guī)范性文件的變更分為幾種類型并對各種類型作了具體分析。 第二部分主要闡述引入合法預期保護的必要性。首先對什么是合法預期作了介紹,然后具體地論述合法預期保護的起源和發(fā)展；其次,對合法預期保護進行法理分析。從法治與法的安定性原則、行政自我約束原則和平等原則、個人自治和平等原則以及行政行為的效力的判定與合法預期保護的關系四個方面著手進行分析。 第三部分主要講述我國立法對合法預期保護的不足。這部分重點闡述信賴保護原則的缺陷和我國現(xiàn)有法律的保護標準具有模糊性。 最后一部分,論述政規(guī)范性文變更下公民合法預期保護的具體方式。首先介紹行政規(guī)范性文件變更中合法預期的適用條件以及預期保護的例外。然后重點介紹合法預期的三種保護方式：程序性保護、實體性保護和補償保護。
[Abstract]:In the current transition period of our country, the change of the upper legal norms is necessary because of the change of the objective circumstances, and once the change occurs, it is necessary to change the administrative normative documents. How to face the trust of citizens in the old legal order before the change and the action taken because of trust, and at the same time, if the administrative legal norm document is changed at will, It is highly vulnerable to the adverse consequences of citizens acting by relying on previous administrative regulations but suffering unforeseeable damage. This question is realistic, on the one hand, based on changes in objective circumstances, In order to carry out the changed policies efficiently, the administrative organs have to change the original normative documents; on the other hand, the legitimate expectations of the relative parties will be potentially threatened. The law must take into account the interests of the relative person to protect them. This makes the conflict between the two inevitable. In essence, it reflects how to coordinate development and stability in the reform and development of our country. How to find a balance between the principle of legal expected protection and the discretion of administrative organs to change normative documents. Therefore, how to provide citizens with administrative normative documents under the change of administrative normative documents. This paper is divided into four parts:. The first part introduces what is an administrative normative document and its nature and legal effect. Then it discusses the meaning of the change of administrative normative document and classifies the change of administrative normative document into several types from the angle of legislation and makes a concrete analysis of each type. The second part mainly expounds the necessity of introducing legal anticipatory protection. Firstly, it introduces what is legal expectation, and then discusses the origin and development of legal anticipatory protection in detail. From the principles of the rule of law and the stability of the law, the principle of administrative self-restraint and the principle of equality, The relationship between the principle of individual autonomy and equality and the validity of administrative action and the legal expected protection is analyzed. The third part is mainly about the deficiency of the legislation of our country to the legal expected protection, which focuses on the defects of the principle of trust protection and the fuzziness of the protection standard of the existing law of our country. The last part, This paper discusses the concrete ways of the citizen's legal expected protection under the change of the administrative normative document. Firstly, it introduces the applicable conditions of the lawful expectation and the exception of the expected protection in the change of the administrative normative document. Then, it focuses on the three kinds of the lawful expectation. Mode of protection: procedural protection, Substantive protection and compensation protection.
【學位授予單位】：湖北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 唐群雁;;論政府法制機構(gòu)對行政規(guī)范性文件的備案審查[J];法制與社會;2012年14期

2 常小銳;;論一般行政規(guī)范性文件的擴張與規(guī)制[J];甘肅社會科學;2005年06期

3 戴中璧;;論行政規(guī)范性文件制度及其完善[J];江蘇科技大學學報(社會科學版);2011年01期

4 胡峻;;論行政規(guī)范性文件評估中的合法性標準[J];湖北行政學院學報;2010年03期

5 李敦智;;規(guī)范性文件的概念及制度建設[J];經(jīng)濟研究導刊;2011年14期

6 劉飛;;信賴保護原則的行政法意義——以授益行為的撤銷與廢止為基點的考察[J];法學研究;2010年06期

7 余凌云;;對《行政許可法》第8條的批判性思考——以九江市麗景灣項目糾紛案為素材[J];清華法學;2007年04期

8 余凌云;;荷蘭行政法上的合法預期[J];清華法學;2011年01期

9 胡建淼;陳海萍;;行政規(guī)范性文件變更中的合法預期[J];浙江社會科學;2010年10期

，

本文編號：1683407