本文選題：環(huán)保NGO　切入點：公益訴訟　出處：《東北林業(yè)大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來以康菲漏油、湖南瀏陽鎘污染、紫金礦業(yè)銅酸水滲漏等為代表的一系列環(huán)境污染事故的發(fā)生,不僅造成嚴重的生態(tài)環(huán)境污染和破壞,也影響了當?shù)厝藗兊恼Ｉ?甚至危害到了群眾的生命、健康、財產(chǎn)安全,因此凸顯出環(huán)境保護在當前的社會生活中的重要意義。環(huán)境保護應成為全社會的共識,光靠政府、企業(yè)的單薄力量是不夠的,需要全體公眾一起行動參與其中來維護環(huán)境公共利益。如此一來確立環(huán)境公益訴訟就顯得尤為重要了。意大利羅馬法學者彼得羅.彭梵得認為,“為維護公共利益而設置的罰金訴訟為民眾訴訟,任何市民都有權提起它�！本吞崞鸸嬖V訟方面,環(huán)保NGO與其他主體相比具有獨特的優(yōu)勢地位,但目前尚存在著不足,如何解決這些不足并充分發(fā)揮自身優(yōu)勢,關系到環(huán)境公益訴訟的良性運轉(zhuǎn)。 目前,我國云南、貴州、江蘇等地結(jié)合現(xiàn)實情況的需要,相繼成立環(huán)境資源保護審判庭,但是這些環(huán)保法庭成立后,卻遭遇了“門庭冷落”的境遇,究其根源還是由于我國缺乏完善的環(huán)境公益訴訟制度,而環(huán)境公益訴訟原告資格問題則是環(huán)境公益訴訟制度的關鍵問題,對其加以深入研究,從而構(gòu)建完善的環(huán)境公益訴訟原告體系,有效保護人類共同的環(huán)境公益訴訟原告體系,有效保護人類共同的環(huán)境利益。 鑒于此,本文試圖通過對我國環(huán)保NGO在環(huán)境公益訴訟中的現(xiàn)實困境分析,并指出其存在的問題。為解決這一問題,分別借鑒了以美國為代表的英美法系、以德國為代表的大陸法系國家中對環(huán)保NGO的實踐經(jīng)驗,并作了比較分析,以提出我國可借鑒的經(jīng)驗模式,形成較強可行性、適合我國國情的環(huán)保NGO的環(huán)境公益訴訟原告資格制度,改善我國環(huán)境公共利益遭受侵害或可能遭受侵害時,得不到及時、有效救濟的狀況,以發(fā)揮環(huán)保NGO的社會功能,解決我國環(huán)境問題,以實現(xiàn)我國社會主義生態(tài)文明,塑造美麗中國。
[Abstract]:In recent years, a series of environmental pollution accidents, such as ConocoPhillips oil spill, cadmium pollution in Liuyang, Hunan Province, and copper acid water leakage in Zijin mining industry, have occurred, which not only caused serious ecological pollution and damage, but also affected the normal life of local people. It even endangers the lives, health and property safety of the masses. Therefore, it highlights the importance of environmental protection in the current social life. Environmental protection should become the consensus of the whole society. It is not enough to rely solely on the weak power of the government and enterprises. All the public need to act together to protect the environmental public interest. So it is especially important to establish the environmental public interest litigation. According to Italian Roman law scholar Petrov Penfandt, "in order to protect the public interest," And the fine action set up is a public action. Any citizen has the right to file it. "in terms of public interest litigation, environmental protection NGO has a unique advantage status compared with other subjects, but there are still shortcomings, how to solve these deficiencies and give full play to its own advantages," he said. Related to the benign operation of environmental public interest litigation. At present, Yunnan, Guizhou, Jiangsu and other places in China have set up environmental and resource protection courts one after another in the light of the needs of the actual situation. However, after the establishment of these environmental protection courts, they have encountered a situation of "cold shoulder". The reason is the lack of perfect environmental public interest litigation system in our country, and the qualification of plaintiff in environmental public interest litigation is the key issue of environmental public interest litigation system. In order to build a perfect plaintiff system of environmental public interest litigation, effectively protect the common environmental public interest litigation plaintiff system, and effectively protect the common environmental interests of mankind. In view of this, this paper attempts to analyze the practical predicament of environmental protection NGO in environmental public interest litigation in China, and points out the existing problems. In order to solve this problem, the paper draws lessons from the Anglo-American legal system, which is represented by the United States, respectively. The practical experience of environmental protection NGO in civil law countries, represented by Germany, is compared and analyzed in order to put forward the experience model that can be used for reference in our country to form a strong feasibility. The environmental public interest litigation plaintiff qualification system of environmental protection NGO, which is suitable for our country's national conditions, can not get timely and effective relief when the environmental public interest is infringed or may be infringed, so as to give play to the social function of environmental protection NGO. To solve the environmental problems in order to realize our socialist ecological civilization and shape the beautiful China.
【學位授予單位】：東北林業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.6;D925.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 張新華;陳婷;;中美環(huán)保NGO發(fā)展比較及對中國的啟示[J];環(huán)境科學與管理;2011年08期

2 李冬梅;韋經(jīng)建;;論現(xiàn)代環(huán)境法面臨的若干新問題——以美國環(huán)境法為視角[J];當代法學;2008年03期

3 田煒;洪華嬌;;淺論我國非政府環(huán)保組織法律制度的完善[J];法制與社會;2011年28期

4 江瑩;郭華;;試論環(huán)保NGO的發(fā)展方向[J];河北大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2006年03期

5 曹明德;王鳳遠;;美國和印度ENGO環(huán)境公益訴訟制度及其借鑒意義[J];河北法學;2009年09期

6 葉良芳;;環(huán)保NGO與環(huán)境公益訴訟推動[J];中國環(huán)境法治;2011年01期

7 李玉娟;;環(huán)境民事公益訴訟中環(huán)保NGO法律地位的反思與重構(gòu)[J];南昌大學學報(人文社會科學版);2011年01期

8 伊媛媛;;論環(huán)保NGO的環(huán)境公益訴訟原告主體資格——以中華環(huán)保聯(lián)合會的環(huán)境公益訴訟實踐為背景[J];江漢大學學報(社會科學版);2012年06期

9 王社坤;;我國環(huán)境公益訴訟司法實踐與制度構(gòu)建調(diào)查報告[J];中國環(huán)境法治;2011年01期

10 ;賈峰:中國環(huán)保NGO尚處于兒童階段[J];綠色視野;2013年01期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 李雪梅;基于多中心理論的環(huán)境治理模式研究[D];大連理工大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1653742