本文選題：安樂死　切入點：立法　出處：《醫(yī)學(xué)與社會》2016年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：近期安樂死問題又起波瀾,比利時、加拿大、法國在立法上都有突破。在我國,安樂死贊成與反對聲音都很強烈,立法時機不成熟,但現(xiàn)實中存在非法安樂死案例,對立法形成挑戰(zhàn)。作為放棄治療的消極安樂死卻支持者眾多,不少國家和地區(qū)基本上立法也都認可。我國消極安樂死普遍存在,但缺乏立法規(guī)制,因而隱藏著放棄治療實施故意殺人的可能,對患者近親屬和醫(yī)務(wù)人員都面臨被追究刑事責任的風險,通過對我國消極安樂死(即放棄治療)立法調(diào)研和當前實際工作中放棄治療,提出了相應(yīng)對策,認可患者簽署的放棄治療意愿書和委托書法律效力,實施中應(yīng)加強審批、監(jiān)督,并做詳細記錄。
[Abstract]:The issue of euthanasia has been on the rise recently. Belgium, Canada, and France have all made breakthroughs in legislation. In our country, euthanasia is very strong in favor and opposition, and the legislative time is not ripe, but in reality there are cases of illegal euthanasia. The negative euthanasia, which is regarded as giving up treatment, has many supporters, and many countries and regions basically accept it. Negative euthanasia is common in our country, but it lacks legislative regulation. Thus hiding the possibility of giving up treatment to carry out intentional homicide, and facing the risk of being investigated for criminal responsibility to patients' close relatives and medical personnel. Through the research on the legislation of passive euthanasia (i.e. abandonment of treatment) in our country and the practice of giving up treatment at present, the corresponding countermeasures are put forward, and the legal effect of the willingness to abandon treatment and the power of attorney signed by the patient is recognized, and the examination and approval and supervision should be strengthened in the implementation. And make detailed records.
【作者單位】： "2011計劃"司法文明協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心;中國政法大學(xué)證據(jù)科學(xué)研究院;中國政法大學(xué)法律碩士學(xué)院;中國政法大學(xué)醫(yī)藥法律與倫理研究中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學(xué)研究規(guī)劃基金項目“司法鑒定服務(wù)合同研究”,編號為14YJA820023
【分類號】：D922.16

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 趙康;胡們;;淺析德國推定承諾與消極安樂死的司法實踐[J];中國檢察官;2014年14期

2 張文婷;;論患者臨終階段的自決權(quán)——無同意能力患者消極安樂死之檢討[J];中德法學(xué)論壇;2009年00期

3 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號：1628498