構(gòu)造與博弈:互聯(lián)網(wǎng)監(jiān)控的權(quán)力關(guān)系解構(gòu)
發(fā)布時間:2018-03-17 07:11
本文選題:互聯(lián)網(wǎng)監(jiān)控 切入點:邏輯構(gòu)造 出處:《行政法學(xué)研究》2017年03期 論文類型:期刊論文
【摘要】:基于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)運行結(jié)構(gòu)形成的監(jiān)控體系在邏輯構(gòu)造上由政治邏輯和經(jīng)濟邏輯構(gòu)成。兩種邏輯進路圍繞政治邏輯形成了國家、商業(yè)組織與社會個體三方參與的權(quán)力關(guān)系。由于各方利益主張不同,權(quán)力關(guān)系時刻處于博弈之中。作為監(jiān)控者,國家與商業(yè)組織會在絕大多數(shù)情境中采取合作策略,而在利益嚴重沖突時則轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)閷共呗。無論監(jiān)控者之間采取何種策略,均將使作為被監(jiān)控者的社會個體利益遭受損害,加劇了權(quán)力結(jié)構(gòu)的不穩(wěn)定性。國家為調(diào)和利益沖突,通過立法程序來確定各方在監(jiān)控關(guān)系中的利益順位。由于立法程序也將國家利益放在首位,而社會個體利益始終放在末尾,這種權(quán)力關(guān)系還將長期處于博弈狀態(tài)中。
[Abstract]:The monitoring system based on the operation structure of Internet is composed of political logic and economic logic in logic structure. The power relationship between commercial organizations and social individuals is always in the game because the interests of all parties are different. As monitors, the state and commercial organizations will adopt cooperative strategies in most situations. No matter what strategy is adopted between the monitors, the interests of the individual society as the monitored person will be harmed and the instability of the power structure will be aggravated. In order to reconcile the conflict of interests, the state will reconcile the conflict of interests. Because the legislative procedure also puts the national interests in the first place, and the social individual interests always put at the end, the power relationship will be in a game state for a long time.
【作者單位】: 西南政法大學(xué);重慶市南岸區(qū)人民檢察院;
【基金】:2015年教育部人文社會科學(xué)研究青年項目“國家治理現(xiàn)代化視野中的犯罪治理模式研究”(1978-2013)(15YJS820085)的階段性成果
【分類號】:D912.1
,
本文編號:1623689
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1623689.html
最近更新
教材專著