本文選題：雙階理論　切入點(diǎn)：自然資源　出處：《內(nèi)蒙古社會(huì)科學(xué)(漢文版)》2017年03期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：自然資源特許出讓協(xié)議的性質(zhì)認(rèn)定,對(duì)于及時(shí)解決此類協(xié)議產(chǎn)生的爭(zhēng)議和更好地維護(hù)公益和私益的平衡具有重要意義。自然資源特許出讓協(xié)議的單純私法屬性觀和公法屬性觀均不可取。結(jié)合德國(guó)雙階理論的分析,自然資源特許出讓協(xié)議具有兩階段性,第一階段為行政許可階段,屬于公法屬性,受公法調(diào)整;第二階段為協(xié)議的簽訂和履行階段,私法屬性更為明顯,主要受私法調(diào)整。但雙階理論認(rèn)為第二階段屬于完全的私法屬性,與現(xiàn)實(shí)不符,應(yīng)當(dāng)進(jìn)行修正。第二階段的協(xié)議履行過(guò)程,也有部分公法因素。對(duì)于因行政機(jī)關(guān)履行行政優(yōu)益權(quán)而引起的爭(zhēng)議屬于公法爭(zhēng)議,應(yīng)當(dāng)適用公法規(guī)范;對(duì)于因履行協(xié)議其他條款引起的爭(zhēng)議屬于私法爭(zhēng)議,應(yīng)當(dāng)適用私法規(guī)范,這在當(dāng)前的立法和司法實(shí)踐中都有所回應(yīng)。自然資源特許出讓協(xié)議的性質(zhì)應(yīng)認(rèn)定為公私法混合性質(zhì)。
[Abstract]:The nature of the natural resource concession agreement, It is of great significance to resolve the disputes arising from such agreements in a timely manner and to better maintain the balance between public and private interests. Neither the view of pure private law attributes nor the view of public law attributes of natural resource concession agreements is desirable. The natural resource concession agreement has two stages: the first stage is the administrative license stage, which belongs to the public law attribute and is regulated by public law; the second stage is the signing and performing stage of the agreement, and the private law attribute is more obvious. But the two-order theory holds that the second stage belongs to the nature of private law, which is not in accordance with the reality, and should be amended. There are also some elements of public law. Disputes arising from the performance of administrative superior interests by administrative organs shall be subject to public law disputes, and public law norms shall be applied to disputes arising from the performance of other articles of the agreement, and private law norms shall be applied to disputes arising from the performance of other articles of the agreement. This is reflected in current legislative and judicial practice. The nature of natural resource concession agreements should be considered as a mixture of public and private law.
【作者單位】： 蘇州大學(xué)王健法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“國(guó)有自然資源使用權(quán)配置研究”(編號(hào):15AZD066) 江蘇省普通高校學(xué)術(shù)學(xué)位研究生創(chuàng)新計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目“國(guó)有自然資源使用權(quán)配置機(jī)制研究”(編號(hào):KYZZ16_0064)
【分類號(hào)】：D922.11;D922.6
，

本文編號(hào)：1611458