本文選題：未生效合同　切入點(diǎn)：行政審批　出處：《煙臺(tái)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：行政審批制度是國(guó)家管理經(jīng)濟(jì)的一項(xiàng)重要制度，國(guó)家通過(guò)設(shè)立審批制度來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)政府管理職能，所以，須經(jīng)行政審批的合同即涉及公法領(lǐng)域，又涉及私法領(lǐng)域。但是我國(guó)關(guān)于未經(jīng)行政審批合同的相關(guān)規(guī)定卻不夠清晰明確，這使得法院未能形成統(tǒng)一的做法，局面混亂。雖然司法解釋將未經(jīng)行政審批的合同定性為未生效合同，但是實(shí)務(wù)界卻按照無(wú)效合同或有效合同來(lái)對(duì)待，實(shí)務(wù)界的不同判決是學(xué)術(shù)界不同理論觀點(diǎn)的呈現(xiàn)，因此理論的深入研究就顯得尤為重要了。 作者細(xì)心研讀大量學(xué)術(shù)成果，結(jié)合我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐，重點(diǎn)論述了未經(jīng)行政審批合同的相關(guān)問(wèn)題，以期對(duì)未經(jīng)審批合同的理論研究有所裨益。本文共分為五個(gè)部分： 第一部分：未經(jīng)行政審批的合同于我國(guó)理論界與實(shí)務(wù)界存在之現(xiàn)狀。本部分簡(jiǎn)要概述了目前我國(guó)理論界的不同學(xué)說(shuō)以及實(shí)務(wù)界對(duì)于該類(lèi)型合同的不同裁判。 第二部分：未經(jīng)行政審批的合同之效力。在分析我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的合同效力狀態(tài)的基礎(chǔ)上，通過(guò)深入探討行政審批的行政，從而未經(jīng)行政審批的合同所具有的效力，，既不同于無(wú)效合同，也不是有效合同，而是未生效合同。 第三部分：物權(quán)法區(qū)分原則與未經(jīng)行政審批的合同。通過(guò)分析物權(quán)法的區(qū)分原則，闡述審批制度與登記制度的不同，從而得出結(jié)論：將物權(quán)法的區(qū)分原則適用于未經(jīng)行政審批合同的效力問(wèn)題上是不合理的。 第四部分：未經(jīng)行政審批合同的責(zé)任認(rèn)定。本部分首先通過(guò)對(duì)比先合同義務(wù)與附隨義務(wù)，得出未生效的合同之上存在的是先合同義務(wù)，在批判效力過(guò)失責(zé)任說(shuō)的基礎(chǔ)之上得出違反先合同義務(wù)應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)締約過(guò)失責(zé)任。 第五部分：救濟(jì)途徑。負(fù)有報(bào)批義務(wù)的一方不履行報(bào)批義務(wù)時(shí)，不能簡(jiǎn)單的判決解除合同，在合同解除方面應(yīng)當(dāng)加以限制。對(duì)于行政審批的撤銷(xiāo)，作者通過(guò)借鑒德、日法學(xué)理論，從而得出自己的觀點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:The administrative examination and approval system is an important system of national economic management, through the examination and approval of the establishment of the system to realize the functions of government management, therefore, subject to administrative examination and approval of the contract which relates to the field of public law, and relates to the field of private law. But in our country without the relevant provisions on the administrative examination and approval of the contract is not clear, the court failed to the formation of a unified approach, the chaos. Although the judicial interpretation will be without a contract for administrative examination and approval of the contract, but the practice is in accordance with the contract invalid or valid contract to treat different judgment practice in academic circles of different theoretical perspectives, so theoretical research is particularly important.
The author carefully studied a lot of academic achievements, and combined with the judicial practice of China, discussed the related problems of the contract without administrative approval, hoping to benefit the theoretical research of the contract without approval. The article is divided into five parts.
The first part: the status quo of the contract without administrative examination and approval in our theoretical and practical circles. This section briefly summarizes the different theories in the theoretical circles at present and the different referees in this field.
The second part: the validity of administrative examination and approval of the contract. Based on the analysis of the effectiveness of China's existing state contract, through in-depth study of the administrative examination and approval of administrative effectiveness, and without administrative approval of the contract. It is different from the invalid contract, is not a valid contract, but not the effect of the contract.
絎笁閮ㄥ垎錛氱墿鏉冩硶鍖哄垎鍘熷垯涓庢湭緇忚鏀垮鎵圭殑鍚堝悓.閫氳繃鍒嗘瀽鐗╂潈娉曠殑鍖哄垎鍘熷垯,闃愯堪瀹℃壒鍒跺害涓庣櫥璁板埗搴︾殑涓嶅悓,浠庤

本文編號(hào)：1587530