本文關鍵詞： 小產權房 集體建設用地使用權 合法化　出處：《貴州民族大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：在全國范圍內尤其是大中型城市及其近郊，均出現(xiàn)以各種名義進行改造建設，最為常見的是新農村建設、城中村改造等等�！靶‘a權房”是一些村集體組織或者開發(fā)商打著新農村建設等名義出售的、建筑在集體土地上的房屋或是由農民自行組織建造的“商品房”。而小產權房的特點如下：第一，不能取得國家頒發(fā)的國有土地使用證和房屋所有權證；第二，小產權房游離與法律保護之外；第三，小產權房具有價格低廉的優(yōu)勢；第四，小產權房是建設在集體土地上的房屋，包括建設在宅基地等集體建設用地上的房屋，以及一些非法占用耕地建設的房屋。在借鑒理論屆研究成果的基礎上，必須從我國處于社會主義初級階段的國情來，提出解決小產權房問題的建設性建議，使小產權房以合法的進入流通環(huán)節(jié)。十八屆三中全會規(guī)定：“在符合規(guī)劃和用途管制前提下，允許農村集體經營性建設用地出讓、租賃、入股，實行與國有土地同等入市、同權同價�？s小征地范圍，規(guī)范征地程序，完善對被征地農民合理、規(guī)范、多元保障機制�！笔钦P于土地政策的改革，一改過去集體所有的土地的使用權不得出讓、轉讓或者出租用于非農業(yè)建設，更難以進入市場進行交易，與城市土地同權不同利現(xiàn)象嚴重。同時從市場經濟發(fā)展的規(guī)律角度看，該現(xiàn)象是市場經濟發(fā)展的必然產物，在符合經濟發(fā)展規(guī)律的前提下，小產權房最終合法化發(fā)展具有必要性和可行性。 小產權房的處理理論屆存在巨大爭議，而實踐中處理也相當復雜，目前可行的方案包括：一，將小產權房納入住房保障體系；二，根據(jù)十八屆三中全會的《決定》內容在補交相關稅費、土地出讓金后將小產權房合法化。實踐中全國各地對小產權房采取強制拆除的處理辦法，或者將小產權房房款為非法所得予以沒收的等措施也都只是治標不治本。小產權房從“不合法到合法是大勢所趨”，即使原來不合法，但在改革的大勢下原來一些不合法的事情變得合法，也是一種和解，“無非是一部分農民得到一些利益。改革不應只計較如此之得失”。1本文正是在充分理解十八屆三中全會《決定》政策后，建議允許小產權房流轉，構建小產權房流轉的平臺，幫助小產權房交易各方處理相關法律、經濟問題。從法律上予以明確將小產權房的流轉合法化，，并針對性的從法律基礎、法理基礎和實證調研的基礎上對小產權房合法化進行論證。
[Abstract]:In the whole country, especially in large and medium-sized cities and their suburbs, reconstruction and construction have taken place in various guises, the most common of which is the construction of new rural areas. Transformation of villages in cities and so on. "small property houses" are sold by some village collective organizations or developers in the name of new rural construction. Houses built on collective land or "commercial houses" built by farmers themselves. The characteristics of small property houses are as follows: first, they cannot obtain state land use certificates and building ownership certificates issued by the state; and second, Apart from free property rights and legal protection; third, small property houses have the advantage of low price; 4th, small property houses are houses built on collective land, including houses built on housing sites and other collective construction land. As well as some houses illegally occupying cultivated land. On the basis of the theoretical research results, we must put forward constructive suggestions to solve the problem of small property right housing from the situation of our country in the primary stage of socialism. The third Plenary session of the 18 CPC Central Committee stipulated: "subject to the premise of planning and use control, rural collective operating construction land is allowed to be sold, leased, invested, and entered into the market on the same footing as state-owned land," the third Plenary session of the 18 CPC Central Committee said. Reducing the scope of land requisition, standardizing the procedures for land requisition, perfecting the reasonable, standardized and pluralistic security mechanism for peasants who have been expropriated. "it is the reform of the government's land policy, and the right to use land owned by collectives in the past may not be transferred," he said. Transfer or lease for non-agricultural construction makes it more difficult to enter the market for trading, which is different from urban land rights and interests. At the same time, from the perspective of the law of the development of market economy, this phenomenon is an inevitable product of the development of market economy. Under the premise of economic development, it is necessary and feasible to legalize the small property house. There is a huge controversy in the theory of the treatment of small property right houses, and the treatment in practice is quite complicated. At present, the feasible solutions include: first, to bring the small property right houses into the housing security system; second, According to the "decision" of the third Plenary session of the 18 Central Committee of the CPC Central Committee, the relevant taxes and fees will be added, and the small property houses will be legalized after the transfer of land. In practice, all parts of the country will adopt the method of compulsory demolition of small property houses. Or the measures of confiscating the funds of small property houses as illegal income are all just temporary measures. Small property houses are the trend of the times from "illegal to legal", even if they were not legal in the past. But under the general trend of reform, some illegal things have become legal. It is also a kind of reconciliation. "nothing but some peasants get some benefits. The reform should not only take account of the gains and losses." 1. After fully understanding the "decision" policy of the third Plenary session of the 18 CPC Central Committee, this article suggests that small property housing should be allowed to circulate. To build a platform for the circulation of small property houses, to help the parties to deal with relevant legal and economic issues. To legalize the circulation of small property houses from the legal point of view, and specifically from the legal basis. On the basis of legal theory and empirical research, the legalization of small property right is demonstrated.
【學位授予單位】：貴州民族大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.29

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 陽雪雅;;城鄉(xiāng)二元土地利用制度下的房屋流轉思考——以小產權房為中心[J];長白學刊;2008年06期

2 蘇力;當代中國法律中的習慣——一個制定法的透視[J];法學評論;2001年03期

3 楊磊;;國土部宣戰(zhàn)小產權[J];南風窗;2010年05期

4 蘇力;中國當代法律中的習慣——從司法個案透視[J];中國社會科學;2000年03期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 程其明;小產權房規(guī)制政策研究[D];武漢大學;2010年

本文編號：1527500