本文關(guān)鍵詞： 受教育權(quán) 受教育權(quán)糾紛 解決途徑 完善　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：教育，既是公民發(fā)展的前提條件，也是國家發(fā)展的動(dòng)力源泉�，F(xiàn)代社會(huì)，受教育權(quán)在許多國家已經(jīng)是一項(xiàng)基本權(quán)利，1我國《憲法》第46條也明確規(guī)定了公民有受教育的權(quán)利。隨著社會(huì)的進(jìn)步和國家的發(fā)展，教育正日益成為個(gè)人發(fā)展的重要因素，受教育也因此受到社會(huì)的廣泛關(guān)注，因公民受教育權(quán)引起的糾紛也逐年增多。但囿于理論上的爭議及法律救濟(jì)制度的不完善，糾紛未能得到有效解決。為了充分保障公民受教育的權(quán)利，本文從受教育權(quán)的本質(zhì)入手，明確受教育權(quán)糾紛的概念及特征，在此基礎(chǔ)上對受教育權(quán)糾紛的種類進(jìn)行劃分。進(jìn)而對受教育權(quán)糾紛的具體案例進(jìn)行考證，剖析受教育權(quán)糾紛解決中存在的問題。最后，對現(xiàn)有理論的反思與改造，提出完善受教育權(quán)糾紛解決途徑的措施。 本文除了引言之外，共分為五個(gè)部分： 第一部分以受教育權(quán)的本質(zhì)作為研究入口，在總結(jié)受教育權(quán)本質(zhì)和內(nèi)容的基礎(chǔ)上，明確受教育權(quán)糾紛的概念及特征。進(jìn)而對受教育權(quán)糾紛的種類進(jìn)行劃分，采用受教育機(jī)會(huì)權(quán)糾紛、受教育條件權(quán)糾紛、受教育成功權(quán)糾紛的劃分方法,以方便對受教育權(quán)糾紛司法實(shí)踐的考證。 第二部分是對受教育權(quán)糾紛司法實(shí)踐的考證。依次對受教育機(jī)會(huì)權(quán)糾紛、受教育條件權(quán)糾紛、受教育成功權(quán)糾紛的相關(guān)案例進(jìn)行分析，探尋糾紛解決中存在的問題。 第三部分是受教育權(quán)糾紛解決中存在的問題。表現(xiàn)為立法缺失、理論困惑、制度缺陷。 第四部分是對現(xiàn)有受教育權(quán)糾紛解決途徑的反思及理論改造。反思以行政行為為視角解決受教育權(quán)糾紛的弊端，采用行政法律關(guān)系理論對受教育權(quán)糾紛分析，突破行政主體、內(nèi)部行政行為等因素的羈絆，，以“重要性理論”為司法審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，為通過行政訴訟途徑解決受教育權(quán)糾紛提供新的理論視角。 第五部分是完善我國受教育權(quán)糾紛解決途徑的思路與措施。一是完善申訴制度的程序性規(guī)定；二是明確行政復(fù)議在受教育權(quán)糾紛中的適用范圍，明確與申訴制度的分工；三是增設(shè)調(diào)解制度作為受教育權(quán)糾紛的解決途徑；四是構(gòu)建教育賠償制度，以期實(shí)現(xiàn)受教育權(quán)糾紛解決途徑的體系化。
[Abstract]:Education, prerequisite for citizens of both development, is also the source of power for national development. In modern society, the right to education is a basic right in many countries, 1 of China's constitution < > forty-sixth stipulates that citizens have the right to education. With the development of society and country, education is increasingly becoming an important factor in the development of the individual, education has also attracted widespread attention of the society, because the citizens' right to education disputes are increasing year by year. But because of the dispute and the legal relief system of the theory is not perfect, the dispute has not been solved. In order to fully protect the rights of citizens to education, this article from the essence of right to education starting with the concept and characteristics of clear right to education disputes, on the basis of the right to education dispute types are divided. Then research on the specific case of disputes of the right to education, analysis of the right to education. In the end, we rethink and remould the existing theories, and put forward measures to improve the ways to solve the disputes of the right to education.
In addition to the introduction, this paper is divided into five parts.
In the first part of the right to education as the essence of entrance, based on a summary of the nature and content of the right to education on the concept and characteristics of clear right to education disputes. Then the types of education disputes are divided by education rights disputes, educational conditions rights disputes, dividing method of success right of education for the convenience of the dispute, the right to education disputes judicial practice research.
The second part is the textual research on the judicial practice of the right to education disputes. In order to explore the problems existing in dispute resolution, we analyze the disputes of the right to education opportunities, the disputes over the right to education and the right to succeed in education.
The third part is the problem in the dispute settlement of the right to education, which is manifested by the lack of legislation, theoretical confusion and system defects.
The fourth part of the existing education and reflection theory to reconstruct the way to solve the disputes. Reflection is the administrative behavior problems to resolve the dispute with the perspective of right to education, the administrative legal relation theory analysis of education disputes, break the administrative body, internal administrative behavior factors such as fetters, to "importance theory" as the standard of judicial review that provides a new theoretical perspective for solving education disputes through administrative litigation.
The fifth part is the solution and measures to improve the measures of right to education disputes. A procedural rules to improve the system; two is a clear scope of administrative reconsideration in the dispute of right to education in the clear division of labor and the appeal system; three is the way to solve disputes as establishing mediation system of the right to education; four is the construction of educational compensation system, in order to realize the right to education dispute settlement system approach.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.16

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 董立山;;高校學(xué)生身份處分權(quán)問題研究[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年05期

2 伍梅;;高校學(xué)生法律救濟(jì)制度探討[J];高教論壇;2005年04期

3 阮李全;陳久奎;;比較視野下的受教育權(quán)法律救濟(jì)制度優(yōu)化路徑[J];重慶師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年01期

4 龔向和;論受教育權(quán)的可訴性及其程度[J];河北法學(xué);2005年10期

5 蔣后強(qiáng);;高等學(xué)校自主權(quán)及其限度[J];高等教育研究;2006年02期

6 申素平;;我國公民受教育權(quán)利的法律保護(hù)[J];中國教育法制評論;2002年00期

7 尹力;;受教育權(quán)利的基本理論問題探討[J];中國教育法制評論;2002年00期

8 鄭賢君;;論公民受教育權(quán)的憲法屬性——兼議社會(huì)權(quán)利的憲法地位[J];中國教育法制評論;2003年00期

9 尹力;論公民受教育權(quán)利的程序法保護(hù)[J];教育科學(xué);2002年01期

10 陳鵬;;高等學(xué)校學(xué)生處分權(quán)的法理學(xué)探析[J];教育研究;2004年09期

本文編號：1517946