本文關(guān)鍵詞： 人事檔案 法律制度 信息自決　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文研究我國(guó)人事檔案法律制度中個(gè)人信息權(quán)利的保護(hù)。通過與國(guó)外個(gè)人信息保護(hù)立法和人事檔案法律制度的比較，筆者認(rèn)為我國(guó)人事檔案法律制度中公民個(gè)人信息權(quán)利的保護(hù)應(yīng)當(dāng)以實(shí)現(xiàn)個(gè)人信息自決為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。文中以個(gè)人信息自決為視角分析我國(guó)人事檔案法律制度對(duì)個(gè)人信息權(quán)利保護(hù)的不足，并嘗試以實(shí)現(xiàn)個(gè)人信息自決為目標(biāo)來探討我國(guó)未來人事檔案法律制度的改革。 第一章為我國(guó)人事檔案法律制度與個(gè)人信息自決。人事檔案是個(gè)人信息的重要載體，我國(guó)的人事檔案更是包含大量重要的個(gè)人信息。在現(xiàn)今的“大數(shù)據(jù)”時(shí)代，立法保護(hù)公民的個(gè)人信息已經(jīng)成為世界性的潮流，個(gè)人信息自決權(quán)作為一項(xiàng)憲法基本權(quán)利已經(jīng)得到了世界范圍內(nèi)的認(rèn)可，它強(qiáng)調(diào)保護(hù)公民對(duì)個(gè)人信息的知情權(quán)、控制權(quán)和救濟(jì)權(quán)。但是我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)的人事檔案法律制度中個(gè)人信息權(quán)利保護(hù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)缺失，引入個(gè)人信息自決標(biāo)準(zhǔn)改革我國(guó)的人事檔案法律制度，能使我國(guó)人事檔案中個(gè)人信息權(quán)利得到最充分的保障，也能順應(yīng)保護(hù)個(gè)人信息自決的世界潮流。 第二章分析我國(guó)人事檔案法律制度中個(gè)人信息自決的現(xiàn)狀。在我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的人事檔案法律制度下，公民幾乎不享有任何個(gè)人信息權(quán)利。從現(xiàn)有的人事檔案立法來看，我國(guó)的人事檔案法律體系存在結(jié)構(gòu)性缺失，，根本無力保障公民個(gè)人信息自決。以個(gè)人信息自決權(quán)利體系為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，我國(guó)的人事檔案制度中公民的個(gè)人信息知情權(quán)先天不足，個(gè)人信息控制權(quán)幾乎完全缺失，個(gè)人信息的救濟(jì)權(quán)也無法得到充分保障。 第三章分析我國(guó)人事檔案法律制度中個(gè)人信息自決的現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)和困境。我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)的封閉式人事檔案法律制度生存的土壤已經(jīng)基本消失，公民個(gè)人信息權(quán)利意識(shí)覺醒，域外人事檔案法律制度也為我國(guó)人事檔案法律制度的改革提供了有益的借鑒，這是我國(guó)人事檔案法律制度中個(gè)人信息自決實(shí)現(xiàn)的現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)。但是由于特殊的歷史傳統(tǒng)和政治經(jīng)濟(jì)背景，要實(shí)現(xiàn)我國(guó)公民人事檔案中個(gè)人信息自決，還存在著來自于執(zhí)政黨、政府部門和公民個(gè)人等多方面的困境。 第四章我國(guó)人事檔案法律制度中個(gè)人信息自決的應(yīng)然狀態(tài)和實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑。我國(guó)的人事檔案法律制度中個(gè)人信息自決的實(shí)現(xiàn)，應(yīng)當(dāng)以個(gè)人信息自決權(quán)利體系為脈絡(luò)，知情權(quán)是前提，控制權(quán)是核心，救濟(jì)權(quán)是保障。要實(shí)現(xiàn)上述三類權(quán)利，立法方面，要以制定個(gè)人信息保護(hù)法和統(tǒng)一的人事檔案法為核心重新構(gòu)建人事檔案法律體系，理順執(zhí)政黨、國(guó)家檔案管理部門與公民個(gè)人之間的法律關(guān)系；在司法方面，要通過保障訴訟權(quán)利，確保個(gè)人信息權(quán)利的救濟(jì)；在行政執(zhí)法方面，國(guó)家檔案管理部門要改變管制行政理念，明確自身權(quán)力和職責(zé)，充分發(fā)揮多種行政救濟(jì)手段的作用。
[Abstract]:This paper studies the protection of personal information rights in the legal system of personnel archives in our country, and compares it with the legislation of personal information protection and the legal system of personnel archives in foreign countries. The author holds that the protection of citizens' right to personal information in the legal system of personnel archives in China should be based on the realization of the self-determination of personal information. In this paper, the author analyzes the legal system of personnel archives in our country on personal information from the perspective of self-determination of personal information. Inadequate protection of rights. And try to realize personal information self-determination as the goal to explore the future reform of China's personnel file legal system. The first chapter is the legal system of personnel files and the self-determination of personal information in China. Personnel files are important carriers of personal information. Our personnel files contain a large number of important personal information. In the present "big data" era, legislation to protect the personal information of citizens has become a worldwide trend. The right to self-determination of personal information, as a basic constitutional right, has been recognized all over the world. It emphasizes the protection of citizens' right to know about personal information. The right of control and relief. However, the traditional legal system of personnel files in our country is lack of personal information right protection standard, so the personal information self-determination standard is introduced to reform the personnel file legal system in our country. It can make the right of personal information in the personnel file of our country get the fullest guarantee, and also conform to the world trend of protecting the self-determination of personal information. The second chapter analyzes the current situation of personal information self-determination in the legal system of personnel archives in China. Citizens almost do not enjoy any right to personal information. From the existing legislation of personnel files, there are structural deficiencies in the legal system of personnel files in our country. With the personal information self-determination system as the standard, the citizen's right to know about personal information in the personnel file system of our country is inherently inadequate, and the personal information control right is almost completely lacking. Personal information relief rights can not be fully protected. The third chapter analyzes the realistic basis and predicament of personal information self-determination in the legal system of personnel archives in China. The soil for the existence of the traditional closed legal system of personnel archives in China has basically disappeared. The awareness of citizens' right to personal information and the extraterritorial legal system of personnel archives also provide a useful reference for the reform of the legal system of personnel archives in our country. This is the realistic basis for the realization of personal information self-determination in the legal system of personnel archives in China, but due to the special historical tradition and political and economic background, it is necessary to realize the self-determination of personal information in the personnel files of Chinese citizens. There are also difficulties from the ruling party, government departments and individual citizens. In the 4th chapter, the author discusses the necessary state and realization path of personal information self-determination in the legal system of personnel archives in our country, and the realization of the self-determination of personal information in the legal system of personnel archives in our country. The right to know is the premise, the right of control is the core, and the right of relief is the guarantee. It is necessary to reconstruct the legal system of personnel archives with the establishment of personal information protection law and unified personnel file law as the core, to straighten out the legal relationship between the ruling party, the national archives management department and the individual citizens; In the judicial aspect, it is necessary to ensure the relief of personal information right by guaranteeing the right to litigation; In the aspect of administrative law enforcement, the national archives management department should change the administrative concept of control, clarify its own power and duty, and give full play to the role of various administrative remedies.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.16

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬劍銀;;哈貝馬斯的基本權(quán)利觀——商談?wù)撘暯堑幕緳?quán)利體系重構(gòu)[J];北大法律評(píng)論;2010年01期

2 周毅;個(gè)人信息權(quán)保護(hù)及其對(duì)人事檔案管理的啟示[J];檔案管理;2005年06期

3 李全祥,王鐵蓮;我國(guó)古代人事檔案考[J];檔案學(xué)通訊;1990年04期

4 萬敏;國(guó)家公務(wù)員制度的推行與我國(guó)干部人事檔案工作的改革[J];檔案學(xué)通訊;1997年01期

5 唐思慧;人事檔案的法學(xué)思考[J];檔案學(xué)研究;2004年06期

6 鄭美虹;人事檔案何時(shí)掀起“蓋頭來”——試析人事檔案知情權(quán)[J];檔案學(xué)研究;2005年05期

7 張建文;;從個(gè)人資料保護(hù)看人事檔案法制的重構(gòu)[J];檔案學(xué)研究;2009年03期

8 徐超華;;論信息自決權(quán)的制度規(guī)范功能及其權(quán)利體系[J];長(zhǎng)江師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

9 羅伯特·阿列克西;;論憲法權(quán)利的構(gòu)造[J];法學(xué)家;2009年05期

10 屠振宇;;從Griswold案看憲法隱私權(quán)的確立[J];法制現(xiàn)代化研究;2007年00期

本文編號(hào)：1485243