本文關(guān)鍵詞： 行政自由裁量權(quán) 裁量收縮 裁量收縮至零　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：行政自由裁量權(quán)是法律賦予行政機(jī)關(guān)的一項(xiàng)至關(guān)重要的權(quán)力,在行政權(quán)中居于核心地位。隨著現(xiàn)代社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)和科技的發(fā)展,政府組織調(diào)整社會(huì)生活的功能和權(quán)限范圍不斷擴(kuò)大,行政機(jī)關(guān)享有的自由裁量權(quán)也隨之增加。因此,現(xiàn)代行政的特點(diǎn)是行政權(quán)力迅速擴(kuò)張,表現(xiàn)為行政機(jī)關(guān)擁有巨大的自由裁量權(quán),它們的存在是提高行政效率之必需。但是,要實(shí)現(xiàn)行政法治,又必須對(duì)行政自由裁量權(quán)加以一定的控制。濫用行政自由裁量權(quán)違背了法律授權(quán)的目的和意愿,干擾和破壞了法治秩序。 對(duì)于行政自由裁量權(quán)的行使和控制是行政法領(lǐng)域爭(zhēng)論的熱點(diǎn)。行政裁量收縮論是對(duì)行政裁量進(jìn)行限制、對(duì)行政裁量合法性進(jìn)行判斷的一種理論。通過對(duì)行政自由裁量權(quán)產(chǎn)生的根源及規(guī)制的緣由的研究,可以為行政裁量收縮理論的研究奠定基礎(chǔ)。這一理論來源于德國(guó)行政法,主要適用于國(guó)家賠償和課以義務(wù)訴訟領(lǐng)域,并為日本行政法所繼受,在我國(guó)的司法實(shí)踐中也有運(yùn)用。它既承認(rèn)行政裁量的價(jià)值,又在一定情況下將行政裁量縮減至零,將行政裁量權(quán)限義務(wù)化。這種將行政便宜主義限制在合理范圍內(nèi)的理論正是其合理性和生命力所在。
[Abstract]:Administrative discretion is a vital power given by law to administrative organs, which occupies a core position in administrative power. With the development of modern society, economy and science and technology. With the expansion of the functions and powers of government organizations to adjust social life, the discretionary power enjoyed by administrative organs has also increased. Therefore, the characteristics of modern administration are the rapid expansion of administrative power. The expression is that the administrative organs have huge discretion, their existence is necessary to improve the administrative efficiency. However, to achieve the administrative rule of law. The abuse of administrative discretion violates the purpose and will of the legal authorization and interferes with and destroys the order of the rule of law. The exercise and control of administrative discretion is a hot issue in the field of administrative law. A theory of judging the legality of administrative discretion. Through the study of the origin of administrative discretion and the cause of regulation. It can lay a foundation for the study of the theory of administrative discretion contraction, which comes from German administrative law, mainly applies to the field of state compensation and compulsory litigation, and is accepted by Japanese administrative law. It not only recognizes the value of administrative discretion, but also reduces administrative discretion to zero under certain circumstances. The theory of limiting administrative discretion to obligation is just its rationality and vitality.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D912.1;D916.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉春萍;;行政裁量的界限與公共利益[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年06期

2 章劍生;論行政公正原則[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2001年05期

3 ;張成銀訴徐州市人民政府房屋登記行政復(fù)議決定案[J];中華人民共和國(guó)最高人民法院公報(bào);2005年03期

4 楊建順;行政裁量的運(yùn)作及其監(jiān)督[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年01期

5 何海波;;司法判決中的正當(dāng)程序原則[J];法學(xué)研究;2009年01期

6 王英津;論我國(guó)的行政自由裁量權(quán)及其濫用防范[J];國(guó)家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

7 尚水利;;行政自由裁量權(quán)的實(shí)質(zhì)性問題[J];國(guó)家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

8 姜明安;;論行政自由裁量權(quán)及其法律控制[J];法學(xué)研究;1993年01期

9 張玉霞;論行政自由裁量權(quán)及其有效控制[J];山東教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

10 余凌云;論對(duì)行政裁量目的不適當(dāng)?shù)膶彶閇J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2003年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1469459