【摘要】：近年來(lái),隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型,民事訴訟案件激增,與此同時(shí)司法實(shí)踐中形式多樣的虛假訴訟頻發(fā),在蘇浙、廣東等經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)此種情況更為突出,《刑法修正案(九)》增設(shè)了虛假訴訟罪,本文主要針對(duì)虛假訴訟罪設(shè)立后的適用困境進(jìn)行總結(jié),對(duì)所表現(xiàn)出的上述問(wèn)題從犯罪構(gòu)成、犯罪形態(tài)等角度進(jìn)行分析,對(duì)民刑銜接的程序問(wèn)題進(jìn)行梳理,最后提出規(guī)制本罪的一些建議。本文正文分三個(gè)部分。第一部分介紹本罪確立與適用困境。先對(duì)本罪的確立背景進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)述,社會(huì)改革的大背景和懲治失信、背信的立法緊迫性直接使本罪入刑。后以司法實(shí)踐中相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)分析、法院判決書(shū)研判等為基礎(chǔ),對(duì)本罪適用中刑事處罰與案件高發(fā)不相適應(yīng)、案發(fā)隱蔽定罪周期長(zhǎng)和適用罪名各異三方面適用困境進(jìn)行列舉說(shuō)明,提出本文所研究問(wèn)題。第二部分為本罪適用困境的原因分析。針對(duì)本罪適用中的困境,分別從本罪的定義、犯罪構(gòu)成的理解和犯罪形態(tài)爭(zhēng)議等方面進(jìn)行分析,并結(jié)合實(shí)踐,就民刑銜接、實(shí)務(wù)中的兩類(lèi)較難認(rèn)定的虛假訴訟等問(wèn)題進(jìn)行探討,力圖對(duì)本罪適用困境的本質(zhì)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行闡明。第三部分是規(guī)制本罪之建議。通過(guò)對(duì)本罪司法實(shí)踐中適用困境的列舉,在分析適用困境原因的基礎(chǔ)上,從明確本罪構(gòu)成要件、對(duì)本罪類(lèi)型化和以信息共享為基礎(chǔ)建立公檢法聯(lián)動(dòng)機(jī)制三個(gè)方面,提出規(guī)制本罪的建議。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the economic development and social transformation, there has been a surge in civil litigation cases. At the same time, various forms of false litigation have occurred frequently in judicial practice, which is even more prominent in economically developed areas such as Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Guangdong, and so on. The Criminal Law Amendment (Nine) adds the crime of false litigation. This paper summarizes the difficult situation after the establishment of the crime of false litigation, and analyzes the above-mentioned problems from the angles of the constitution of crime, the form of crime, and so on. This paper combs the procedural problems of the connection between civil and criminal punishment, and finally puts forward some suggestions for regulating this crime. The main body of this paper is divided into three parts. The first part introduces the establishment and application dilemma of this crime. First of all, this paper briefly describes the background of the establishment of this crime, the background of social reform and punishment of breach of trust, the legislative urgency of breach of trust directly makes this crime into punishment. On the basis of the analysis of relevant data in judicial practice and the study of the judgment of the court, the author enumerates and explains the difficulties in applying the criminal punishment in the application of this crime to the high incidence of the case, the long cycle of the covert conviction in the case and the different applicable charges. The problems studied in this paper are put forward. The second part is the analysis of the reasons for the predicament of the application of this crime. In view of the dilemma in the application of the crime, this paper analyzes the definition of the crime, the understanding of the constitution of the crime and the dispute of the form of the crime, and discusses the connection between the civil and criminal punishment and the two kinds of false litigation in practice, which are difficult to identify, and so on. Try to clarify the essence of the dilemma of the application of this crime. The third part is the suggestion of regulating this crime. By enumerating the applicable predicament in the judicial practice of this crime, on the basis of analyzing the reasons of applying the dilemma, this paper clarifies the constituent elements of this crime, classifies the crime and establishes the linkage mechanism of public security bureau, procuratorate and court on the basis of information sharing. Put forward some suggestions to regulate this crime.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 扎西;;防不勝防的虛假訴訟[J];檢察風(fēng)云;2009年18期

2 李榮梅;;虛假訴訟刑法規(guī)制思辨[J];學(xué)理論;2009年25期

3 李翡;;虛假訴訟行為探析與整治[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年01期

4 尉蘭琴;;試論虛假訴訟[J];隴東學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

5 趙赤;李燕山;;論虛假訴訟的刑法規(guī)制[J];江漢論壇;2010年02期

6 胡蓓;;論虛假訴訟的刑事可罰性及司法應(yīng)對(duì)[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年14期

7 薛瑋;;當(dāng)前民間借貸虛假訴訟案件的認(rèn)定與防范[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年15期

8 畢慧;;論民事虛假訴訟的法律規(guī)制[J];浙江學(xué)刊;2010年03期

9 范水清;;淺談如何防范打擊虛假訴訟[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2010年11期

10 梁婷;;民事虛假訴訟現(xiàn)狀及其規(guī)制[J];黔南民族師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 本報(bào)記者 董小軍　本報(bào)通訊員 陳海濱 舒沁;警惕虛假訴訟的欺詐[N];寧波日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

2 本報(bào)記者 袁定波;修正刑法解決對(duì)虛假訴訟制裁問(wèn)題[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

3 江蘇省常州市天寧區(qū)人民法院 李霞;虛假訴訟現(xiàn)象亟待引起重視[N];人民法院報(bào);2008年

4 本報(bào)記者 余建華　孟煥良;浙江 刑罰之劍指向虛假訴訟[N];人民法院報(bào);2010年

5 本報(bào)記者 蔣萍　通訊員 吳祿嬋;虛假訴訟可能涉及十宗罪[N];文匯報(bào);2010年

6 媒體評(píng)論員 劉英團(tuán);以刑事制裁應(yīng)對(duì)“虛假訴訟”[N];人民法院報(bào);2010年

7 本報(bào)記者 白龍　張爍;多管齊下嚴(yán)打虛假訴訟[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

8 黃廷旺　紀(jì)明龍;虛假訴訟的成因與防范[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2010年

9 本報(bào)記者 魯晟;虛假訴訟:民事到刑事的嬗變[N];民主與法制時(shí)報(bào);2010年

10 記者 劉慧靜 通訊員 蒲華峰;虛假訴訟 緣何愈演愈烈[N];舟山日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 張昕;虛假訴訟問(wèn)題研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年

2 譚慧;虛假訴訟成因與對(duì)策研究[D];貴州大學(xué);2009年

3 許勤;從司法角度看虛假訴訟的刑法規(guī)制[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

4 項(xiàng)衛(wèi)兵;虛假訴訟行為的刑法規(guī)制[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

5 郝元元;民事虛假訴訟研究[D];河南大學(xué);2012年

6 王s，

本文編號(hào)：2475837