本文關(guān)鍵詞： 法域 區(qū)際刑事法律 沖突 刑事管轄權(quán)　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：中國區(qū)際刑事法律是指中國主權(quán)范圍內(nèi)四法域(即中國內(nèi)地、香港、澳門、臺(tái)灣),為協(xié)調(diào)解決四法域不同刑事法律及法域治權(quán)競合沖突,而提出的所有法律規(guī)范、法律原則以及法律融通機(jī)制的總稱。中國區(qū)際刑法沖突研究不僅關(guān)系到法律層面的司法主權(quán)和法制體系等問題也關(guān)系到政治層面的民族認(rèn)同感和國家統(tǒng)一問題。中國一系列復(fù)雜、特殊的國情衍生的具有挑戰(zhàn)性、發(fā)展中的新的區(qū)際法律問題亟待從理論上分析和研究并力圖去的突破,以期在實(shí)踐中應(yīng)社會(huì)實(shí)際所需創(chuàng)新出一套適應(yīng)中國以“一國兩制”為特點(diǎn)的特殊國家結(jié)構(gòu)形式的法律體系來。本文首先對(duì)區(qū)際刑法沖突進(jìn)行概述,并就美國和德國的解決模式評(píng)析,在分析國外解決模式結(jié)合中國自身特點(diǎn)的前提下,重點(diǎn)理析中國區(qū)際刑事法律的內(nèi)容并提出相應(yīng)解決途徑,在理析內(nèi)容的基礎(chǔ)上探討原則性解決模式并在中國區(qū)際刑事管轄權(quán)體劃分上提出以地域原則為主,國家利益最高利益原則為前提,刑法目原則為前置以及充分考慮司法效益具體劃分原則。本文在解決途徑的論述中,主要是從憲法性文件的完善和具體的法律機(jī)構(gòu)的健全加以闡述。本文分為四部分闡述中國區(qū)際刑法律沖突問題： 第一部分是區(qū)際刑事法沖突概述。這一部分首先介紹了區(qū)際刑法及區(qū)際刑法沖突的概念,同時(shí)亦對(duì)中國相關(guān)的概念進(jìn)行界定,最后介紹了區(qū)際刑事法律沖突的產(chǎn)生原因。 第二部分是國外的解決模式,這一部分分別介紹了美國和德國區(qū)際刑事法律沖突問題的解決途徑,并對(duì)兩國解決模式進(jìn)行比較意義上的理析。 第三部分是中國區(qū)際刑法的內(nèi)容與特征。這一部分首先介紹了中國區(qū)際刑法沖突產(chǎn)生原因,其次對(duì)中國區(qū)際刑法的內(nèi)容進(jìn)行探討并側(cè)重靜念沖突分析研究以及區(qū)際管轄權(quán)概念、分類、特征的理析,最后介紹了中國區(qū)際刑法的特征。 第四部分是中國區(qū)際刑法的基本原則和解決途徑。這一部分主要是中國區(qū)際刑法沖突的解決模式的探討和完善,首先討論了原則性解決,其次探討中國區(qū)際刑事法律沖突具體解決機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:The inter-regional criminal law of China refers to all the legal norms proposed by the four jurisdictions within the scope of China's sovereignty (that is, the mainland of China, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, etc.) in order to coordinate the settlement of conflicts between different criminal laws and jurisdiction in the four jurisdictions, The research on the conflict of criminal law between regions in China is not only related to the judicial sovereignty and legal system in the legal level, but also to the national identity and national unity at the political level. China has a series of complexities, The special national conditions derived from the challenging, developing new interregional legal problems need to be theoretically analyzed and studied and strive to break through, In order to innovate a set of legal system which adapts to China's special state structure with the characteristic of "one country, two systems" in practice, this paper first summarizes the conflict of interregional criminal law. On the basis of the analysis of the solutions of the United States and Germany, and on the premise of analyzing the foreign solutions combined with China's own characteristics, this paper focuses on the analysis of the content of China's inter-regional criminal law and puts forward the corresponding solutions. On the basis of the analysis of the content, the paper discusses the mode of principled solution and puts forward that the principle of region is the main factor and the principle of the highest interests of the state is the premise of the division of the criminal jurisdiction body between regions in China. The principle of criminal law is the principle of preemption and the principle of giving full consideration to the specific division of judicial benefits. This article is divided into four parts to expound the legal conflict of interregional punishment in China. The first part is an overview of the conflict of interregional criminal law. This part first introduces the concepts of interregional criminal law and interregional criminal law conflict, at the same time, defines the relevant concepts in China, and finally introduces the causes of interregional criminal law conflict. The second part is the solution mode of foreign countries. This part introduces the solutions to the conflict of criminal law between the United States and Germany, and makes a comparative analysis of the two countries' solutions. The third part is the content and characteristics of China's interregional criminal law. Secondly, it discusses the content of China's interregional criminal law and focuses on the analysis of the conflict between static and mental states, as well as the concept, classification and characteristics of interregional jurisdiction. Finally, it introduces the characteristics of China's inter-regional criminal law. Part 4th is the basic principle and solution of China's interregional criminal law. This part is mainly about the exploration and improvement of the solution mode of the conflict of Chinese interregional criminal law. Secondly, it discusses the specific settlement mechanism of the interregional conflict of criminal law in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D921;D924

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙相林,劉英紅;美國州際法律沖突與我國區(qū)際法律沖突之比較[J];比較法研究;2000年01期

2 高銘暄,王秀梅;我國區(qū)際刑事管轄沖突的內(nèi)涵及解決原則[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年06期

3 倪德鋒;論中國區(qū)際刑事管轄權(quán)的沖突與解決[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年01期

4 趙秉志;田宏杰;;中國內(nèi)地與香港刑事管轄權(quán)沖突研究──由張子強(qiáng)案件引發(fā)的思考[J];法學(xué)家;1999年06期

5 柯良棟;;論中國區(qū)際移交逃犯應(yīng)遵循的原則及其模式[J];法學(xué)家;2008年04期

6 杜煥芳;中國區(qū)際法律問題研究的最新進(jìn)展——評(píng)《中國的區(qū)際法律問題研究》[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2004年05期

7 馬進(jìn)保;;我國內(nèi)地與港澳的區(qū)際司法協(xié)助與機(jī)制構(gòu)建[J];河北法學(xué);2008年03期

8 郭玉軍;徐錦堂;;中國區(qū)際法律沖突解決路徑探析(上)[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2008年01期

9 時(shí)延安;;中國區(qū)際刑法概念及基本體系[J];南都學(xué)壇;2006年02期

10 姜雯;;《反分裂國家法》初探[J];理論界;2006年07期

，

本文編號(hào)：1551959