【摘要】： 隨著世界經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的發(fā)展,國(guó)際貿(mào)易越來(lái)越頻繁,航運(yùn)業(yè)也因此蓬勃發(fā)展。船舶建造作為航運(yùn)業(yè)的上游產(chǎn)業(yè),發(fā)展的速度也是驚人的,越來(lái)越多的人加入該行業(yè)。但是,我國(guó)整個(gè)船舶建造行業(yè)在法律背景和實(shí)務(wù)操作上還存在著許多漏洞,制約著我國(guó)航運(yùn)業(yè)的發(fā)展。 本文以“SAJ”格式文本為研究基礎(chǔ),同時(shí)結(jié)合“AWES”格式文本和“CSTC”格式文本,運(yùn)用比較分析法,研究了船舶建造合同中建造方的主要合同義務(wù),即按約定交付和保證船舶質(zhì)量?jī)蓚�(gè)方面。本文在分析有關(guān)船舶建造案例的基礎(chǔ)上,采取“義務(wù)——責(zé)任——救濟(jì)”的思路,深入分析了船舶建造中建造方違約行為的主要表現(xiàn),以及買(mǎi)方根據(jù)合同和法律可采取的法律救濟(jì)。 本文分為四章。第1章運(yùn)用法理學(xué)、合同法學(xué)以及國(guó)際私法學(xué)的理論知識(shí),分析了船舶建造合同的特征、涉及的主要關(guān)系方和法律適用,并著重研究了船舶建造合同的法律性質(zhì)。第2章根據(jù)我國(guó)的《合同法》,并結(jié)合船舶建造合同,從理論上分析了建造方的可能存在違約責(zé)任和買(mǎi)方的可采取的法律救濟(jì)。第3章以“SAJ”格式文本為基礎(chǔ),從建造方違反交船義務(wù)的角度分析了買(mǎi)方可采取的法律救濟(jì),包括建造方遲延交付船舶、沒(méi)有交付船舶以及在法律交接中可能產(chǎn)生的問(wèn)題。第4章也是以“SAJ”格式文本為基礎(chǔ),從建造方違反質(zhì)量保證義務(wù)的角度分析了買(mǎi)方可采取的法律救濟(jì),包括交船之前和交船之后兩個(gè)階段。 合同是自由的,所以在簽訂船舶建造合同時(shí)雙方盡量把條款定的詳細(xì)點(diǎn),最好約定船舶建造合同的性質(zhì)。沒(méi)有約定時(shí),如果船舶買(mǎi)方提供建造船舶所需的主要原材料或者設(shè)備,合同應(yīng)被認(rèn)定為承攬合同;如果船舶建造方提供建造船舶所需的主要原材料或者設(shè)備時(shí),合同應(yīng)被認(rèn)定為買(mǎi)賣(mài)合同。如果合同雙方選用“SAJ”格式文本,盡量能對(duì)文本中的一些條款做出修改。 對(duì)于我國(guó)《海商法》第25條第2款的規(guī)定,不能簡(jiǎn)單地就據(jù)此推出船舶建造合同中建造方對(duì)船舶不享有所有權(quán),該條是有適用條件的。
[Abstract]:With the development of world economic globalization, international trade is becoming more and more frequent, and the shipping industry is booming. As the upstream industry of the shipping industry, shipbuilding is developing at an astonishing speed, and more people join the industry. However, there are still many loopholes in the legal background and practical operation of the whole shipbuilding industry in China, which restricts the development of the shipping industry in our country. On the basis of "SAJ" format text, combined with "AWES" format text and "CSTC" format text, this paper uses comparative analysis method to study the main contractual obligations of the builder in the shipbuilding contract. Namely according to the agreement delivery and guarantee ship quality two aspects. On the basis of analyzing the cases of ship construction, this paper adopts the idea of "obligation-responsibility-relief", and deeply analyzes the main behavior of the breach of contract by the constructor in the construction of the ship. And legal remedies available to the buyer in accordance with the contract and the law. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter analyzes the characteristics of ship construction contract, the main parties involved and the application of law by using the theoretical knowledge of jurisprudence, contract law and private international law, and focuses on the legal nature of ship construction contract. In Chapter 2, according to the contract Law of our country and combined with the contract of ship construction, the author theoretically analyzes the possible liability of the constructor for breach of contract and the legal remedy that the buyer can take. Chapter 3 is based on the text of "SAJ" format, and analyzes the legal remedies that the buyer may take from the point of view of the breach of the obligation of delivery by the constructor, including the late delivery of the ship by the builder, the failure to deliver the ship and the problems that may arise in the transfer of law. The fourth chapter is also based on the "SAJ" format text, from the point of view of breach of quality assurance obligations, the buyer can take legal remedies, including before and after delivery of the two stages. The contract is free, so when signing a shipbuilding contract, the parties should try to specify the terms and conditions, and it is best to agree on the nature of the shipbuilding contract. If the buyer of the ship provides the main raw materials or equipment required for the construction of the ship, the contract shall be deemed to be a contract of contract; The contract shall be deemed to be a contract of sale if the ship builder provides the main raw materials or equipment required for the construction of the ship. If the parties to the contract choose the "SAJ" format text, try to modify some of the terms of the text. As for the provision of Article 25 (2) of the Maritime Law of China, it is impossible to simply draw out the contract of ship construction in which the constructor does not enjoy the ownership of the ship, which is subject to applicable conditions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.6

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王永剛;;建造中船舶的所有權(quán)與抵押權(quán)辨析[J];水運(yùn)管理;2009年02期

2 丁瑋;王英;;船舶合同糾紛的仲裁解決機(jī)制研究[J];學(xué)理論;2011年11期

3 林新華;;船舶建造合同中建造方的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及防范[J];重慶工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年04期

4 翟淑英;中國(guó)首起船舶轉(zhuǎn)賣(mài)糾紛始末[J];法律與生活;1994年10期

5 ;中華人民共和國(guó)船舶登記條例[J];中國(guó)遠(yuǎn)洋航務(wù)公告;1995年05期

6 呂衛(wèi)紅;淺論船舶抵押權(quán)設(shè)定的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];珠江水運(yùn);2005年06期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 李志文;;論建造中船舶及所有權(quán)歸屬[A];現(xiàn)代船舶機(jī)電維修技術(shù)（2005）[C];2005年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 本報(bào)記者 李承萬(wàn);風(fēng)險(xiǎn)伴征途 企業(yè)慎決策[N];中國(guó)船舶報(bào);2004年

2 王逸華 曹焱;掌握標(biāo)準(zhǔn)造船合同 規(guī)避船廠經(jīng)營(yíng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[N];中國(guó)船舶報(bào);2005年

3 馬宗文;馬尾造船公司抓緊技改[N];中國(guó)船舶報(bào);2004年

4 記者 宋幼勤;中船集團(tuán)訂單突破二百萬(wàn)噸[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2002年

5 通訊員 何寶新;外高橋公司打入歐洲市場(chǎng)[N];中國(guó)船舶報(bào);2002年

6 彭國(guó)福;利用合資平臺(tái)造大船[N];中國(guó)船舶報(bào);2003年

7 記者 李承萬(wàn);金陵船廠15年造船162艘無(wú)一脫期[N];中國(guó)船舶報(bào);2003年

8 中船集團(tuán)公司廣州管理局局長(zhǎng) 管學(xué)仲;瞄準(zhǔn)一流 迎頭趕上[N];中國(guó)船舶報(bào);2004年

9 柴慧;讓上市公司會(huì)計(jì)、審計(jì)更規(guī)范[N];中國(guó)財(cái)經(jīng)報(bào);2003年

10 李常永;中船重工再獲新船訂單[N];中國(guó)船舶報(bào);2002年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 郭維毅;國(guó)際船舶建造合同中買(mǎi)方法律救濟(jì)研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2008年

2 常松;論船舶建造合同中試航階段的法律問(wèn)題[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2003年

3 王振波;國(guó)際船舶建造合同中建造方的救濟(jì)研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2373737