【摘要】：海事優(yōu)先權(quán)制度是海商法的基本制度之一,在維護(hù)當(dāng)事人的共同利益以及保護(hù)弱勢(shì)方當(dāng)事人利益方面具有十分重要的意義。貨物優(yōu)先權(quán)制度足海事優(yōu)先權(quán)制度的重要內(nèi)容,其目的就在于更好地保護(hù)救助人等特定海事請(qǐng)求人的利益。但就我國(guó)而言,對(duì)貨物優(yōu)先權(quán)制度進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)研究者尚屬空白,筆者選取這一題目,希望通過(guò)考察各國(guó)和國(guó)際立法,加以學(xué)理論述,深化這一領(lǐng)域的研究,完善我國(guó)的相關(guān)立法。 本書(shū)除引言和結(jié)論外,共分四章。第一章是關(guān)于貨物優(yōu)先權(quán)這一制度的概述,包括貨物優(yōu)先權(quán)的含義、特征、性質(zhì)及其歷史發(fā)展;第二章探討貨物優(yōu)先權(quán)法律制度的具體內(nèi)容,考察了貨物優(yōu)先權(quán)的標(biāo)的、擔(dān)保的債權(quán)范圍、受償順序及其行使和消滅;第三章論述貨物優(yōu)先權(quán)與其他相關(guān)法律制度的關(guān)系,分別討論了貨物優(yōu)先權(quán)與其他擔(dān)保物權(quán)、船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)、海上貨物留置權(quán)、扣押船載貨物等相關(guān)概念的聯(lián)系與區(qū)別:第四章通過(guò)前幾章的論述總結(jié)出我國(guó)《海商法》中有關(guān)海事優(yōu)先權(quán)制度規(guī)定的缺陷,并有針對(duì)地提出相關(guān)的立法建議。 本文通過(guò)比較研究得出結(jié)論。海事優(yōu)先權(quán)并不等同于船舶優(yōu)先權(quán),海事優(yōu)先權(quán)制度還應(yīng)當(dāng)包括貨物優(yōu)先權(quán)的相關(guān)制度。貨物優(yōu)先權(quán)制度在許多國(guó)家都有明文規(guī)定,以保護(hù)特定債權(quán)的海事請(qǐng)求人的利益,我國(guó)《海商法》在這方面僅有船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)制度以及海上貨物留置權(quán)制度,并在《海事訴訟特別程序法》中規(guī)定了扣押船載貨物相關(guān)的程序性規(guī)定,但這些規(guī)定也是不全面的,不利于保護(hù)當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益。因此我國(guó)應(yīng)當(dāng)設(shè)立貨物優(yōu)先權(quán)制度,以健全海事優(yōu)先權(quán)制度的立法體系。
[Abstract]:Maritime priority system is one of the basic systems of maritime law, which is of great significance in safeguarding the common interests of the parties and protecting the interests of the weak parties. The system of goods priority is sufficient for the important content of maritime priority system, and its purpose is to better protect the interests of certain maritime claimants such as the salvor. However, as far as our country is concerned, it is still a blank for the systematic researchers to study the system of priority of goods. The author chooses this topic and hopes that through investigating the national and international legislation, the author will discuss it theoretically, deepen the research in this field, and perfect the relevant legislation of our country. In addition to the introduction and conclusions, the book is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is an overview of the system of priority in goods, including the meaning, characteristics, nature and historical development of the priority in goods, the second chapter discusses the specific content of the legal system of priority in goods, and examines the subject matter of priority in goods. Chapter III discusses the relationship between the lien of goods and other relevant legal systems, including the lien of goods and other security interests, maritime liens, etc. The fourth chapter summarizes the defects of maritime priority system in Maritime Law of China through the discussion of the previous chapters, and puts forward some relevant legislative suggestions. This paper draws a conclusion through comparative study. Maritime lien is not equal to maritime lien, and maritime lien system should include relevant system of goods lien. In many countries, the system of lien of goods is expressly stipulated to protect the interests of maritime claimants with specific claims. In this respect, China's Maritime Law has only the maritime lien system and the maritime lien system. In the Special procedure Law of Maritime Proceedings, the procedural provisions relating to the arrest of cargo on board a ship are stipulated, but these provisions are also incomplete and are not conducive to the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties. Therefore, our country should establish the goods priority system, in order to perfect the maritime priority system legislative system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：D996.19;D913

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 董媛媛;貨物優(yōu)先權(quán)法律制度研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2006年

2 錢(qián)翔;南非海事優(yōu)先權(quán)制度研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2260330