【摘要】： 我國1995年的《擔(dān)保法》順應(yīng)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的需要,規(guī)定了動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押制度�！稉�(dān)保法》對(duì)動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押公示方式的規(guī)定和世界其他國家一樣,借用了不動(dòng)產(chǎn)物權(quán)的公示方式。利用登記對(duì)動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押進(jìn)行公示。但由于動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押登記缺乏表現(xiàn)于外部的表面特征,動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押制度便與相關(guān)法律制度產(chǎn)生了激烈沖突�！稉�(dān)保法解釋》和《物權(quán)法草案》都對(duì)此進(jìn)行了一定的完善,但都沒有解決動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押的公示缺陷問題。隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押的融資功能越來越大,但是動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押的公示缺陷卻一直阻礙著動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押制度發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的功能。 本文立足于我國的現(xiàn)實(shí)國情,結(jié)合我國《擔(dān)保法》、《擔(dān)保法解釋》、《海商法》、《民用航空器法》以及《物權(quán)法草案》,以歷史法學(xué)和比較法學(xué)為研究方法,分析了我國動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押公示方式的現(xiàn)有規(guī)定,指出我國動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押公示的缺陷是抵押登記缺乏表現(xiàn)于外部的表面特征;在分析了國內(nèi)外解決動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押公示難題的各種具體作法及學(xué)者建議的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了適合我國國情的解決動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押公示難題的辦法。本文除前言、結(jié)論外,共分三章。 第一章我國動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押公示方式的現(xiàn)狀及其缺陷。 我國《擔(dān)保法》區(qū)分不同的動(dòng)產(chǎn)對(duì)動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押分別采取登記成立主義和書面成立——登記對(duì)抗主義的立法方式�！段餀�(quán)法草案》對(duì)此進(jìn)行了一定的修改,把動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押公示方式統(tǒng)一為書面成立——登記對(duì)抗主義。但是《擔(dān)保法》、《物權(quán)法草案》都沒有采取措施,彌補(bǔ)動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押公示方式的缺陷。在動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押公示的效力上,沒有明確規(guī)定善意第三人的范圍�！稉�(dān)保法解釋》、《物權(quán)法草案》都賦予了動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押登記
[Abstract]:Our country's 1995 "guarantee Law" conforms to the need of economic development and prescribes the system of chattel mortgage. Like other countries in the world, it borrows the public form of real property right of real estate. Use registration to publicize the chattel mortgage. However, due to the lack of external features in the registration of chattel mortgage, the chattel mortgage system has had a fierce conflict with the relevant legal system. Both the interpretation of the guarantee Law and the draft of the Real right Law have made certain improvements to this issue. However, none of them has solved the problem of imperfection of publication of chattel mortgage. With the development of economy, the financing function of chattel mortgage is more and more great, but the imperfection of public notice of chattel mortgage has been hindering the chattel mortgage system to play its proper function. This paper is based on the reality of our country, combined with our country's "Guaranty Law", "Guaranty Law interpretation", "Maritime Law", "Civil aircraft Law" and "draft of property Law", taking historical law and comparative law as research methods. This paper analyzes the existing regulations on the publicity of chattel mortgage in our country, and points out that the defects of the publicity of chattel mortgage in our country are the superficial features of the lack of mortgage registration. Based on the analysis of various concrete methods and suggestions made by scholars at home and abroad to solve the problem of publication of movable property mortgage, this paper puts forward some methods to solve the problem of publicity of chattel mortgage publicity suitable for the situation of our country. In addition to the preface and conclusion, this paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter is about the present situation and defects of the publicity mode of chattel mortgage in our country. The Law of Guaranty of our country distinguishes different kinds of chattel mortgage from chattel mortgage by adopting the legislative methods of registration establishment doctrine and written establishment-registration antagonism respectively. The draft of the Real right Law has made certain amendments to this. Unifying the publicity mode of chattel mortgage as written establishment-registration antagonism. However, neither the Law of Guaranty nor the draft of Real right Law has taken any measures to remedy the defects of the way of publication of chattel mortgage. There is no clear definition of the scope of bona fide third party in the publicity of chattel mortgage.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曉琢也;;流動(dòng)動(dòng)產(chǎn)擔(dān)保在破產(chǎn)程序中的處理[J];公司法律評(píng)論;2009年00期

2 楊鐵軍;;論典當(dāng)行經(jīng)營范圍[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年04期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 彭宇;動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押貸款將向個(gè)人開放[N];今日信息報(bào);2003年

2 鐘茂富　王發(fā)祥 黃榮盛;武平動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押幫助企業(yè)解決融資難[N];閩西日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

3 記者 岳建輝　通訊員 盧付昌;扶溝動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押幫助企業(yè)解決融資難[N];周口日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

4 孫德立;阜寧：動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押助企渡難關(guān)[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2009年

5 劉新華;贛榆工商動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押助農(nóng)企融資[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2009年

6 陳秀云　盛秦嶺 秦穎;動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押助企融資6個(gè)億[N];淄博日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

7 毛鴻雁　劉奇;丹陽動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押助企融資 突破十億元[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2010年

8 何俠民　鄭英;動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押去年助企融資38.6億[N];江陰日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

9 丁建明 章俊;動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押融資成重要渠道[N];常州日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

10 岳靜濤;開展動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押 搭建融資平臺(tái)[N];吉林日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 徐潔;擔(dān)保物權(quán)功能論[D];西南政法大學(xué);2004年

2 鄢夢(mèng)萱;中小企業(yè)間接融資法律問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

3 祝健;中國農(nóng)村金融體系重構(gòu)研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 郝鳳軍;論我國動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押公示的缺陷及其完善[D];中國政法大學(xué);2006年

2 張海龍;動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押相關(guān)問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

3 張婷;論動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押物的范圍[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

4 鹿楠;動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押法律制度研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2010年

5 申金平;中韓動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押制度比較研究[D];延邊大學(xué);2011年

6 呂天雯;動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押公示問題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2011年

7 姚軍;動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押標(biāo)的物范圍的界定[D];華中科技大學(xué);2011年

8 李宏_";論動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押制度[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2004年

9 劉偉;論動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押物的轉(zhuǎn)讓[D];蘇州大學(xué);2011年

10 張中;論動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押[D];四川大學(xué);2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：2162107