【摘要】：如電子認(rèn)證服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)違反保證主體身份識(shí)別、數(shù)據(jù)電文的機(jī)密完整有效的原則性義務(wù)給電子簽名人、依賴人造成損害,應(yīng)承擔(dān)損害賠償責(zé)任。作者通過批判各種不承認(rèn)電子認(rèn)證服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)在認(rèn)證服務(wù)中對(duì)依賴人承擔(dān)的責(zé)任是侵權(quán)責(zé)任的觀點(diǎn),并借鑒相關(guān)立法例,提出本文觀點(diǎn):在電子認(rèn)證服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)違反保證主體身份識(shí)別、數(shù)據(jù)電文機(jī)密完整有效的義務(wù)前提下,對(duì)簽名人承擔(dān)合同責(zé)任,對(duì)依賴人承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任。之后,在我國傳統(tǒng)民法理論并結(jié)合德國、我國臺(tái)灣相關(guān)理論的基礎(chǔ)上,文章對(duì)此進(jìn)行了進(jìn)一步論述。電子認(rèn)證服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)簽名人承擔(dān)的合同責(zé)任體現(xiàn)在:訂約過程中因拒絕服務(wù)給簽名人造成損害時(shí)電子認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)承擔(dān)締約過失責(zé)任、簽名人無法簽名或證書被人非法使用時(shí)認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)承擔(dān)違約責(zé)任、證書撤銷后違反后合同義務(wù)時(shí)比照違約責(zé)任處理。電子認(rèn)證服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)依賴人的責(zé)任符合侵權(quán)責(zé)任的四構(gòu)成要件:電子認(rèn)證服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)違反保護(hù)第三人之法律的行為構(gòu)成違法行為;該行為損害了依賴人的利益構(gòu)成損害事實(shí);損害事實(shí)與違法行為之間存在因果關(guān)系;電子認(rèn)證服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)與簽名人串通時(shí)對(duì)依賴人的損害存在故意,未串通時(shí)存在過失。電子認(rèn)證服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)依賴人的責(zé)任宜采過錯(cuò)推定原則,責(zé)任的形態(tài)以補(bǔ)充責(zé)任為主,實(shí)行有限賠償原則。
[Abstract]:If the electronic authentication service organization violates the principle obligation of guaranteeing the subject identification, the confidentiality of the data message is complete and effective, and the electronic signer is injured by the relying person, it should be liable for damages. The author criticizes the view that the liability of the electronic certification service organization to the dependant is tort liability, and draws lessons from the relevant legislation. This paper puts forward the following points: under the premise that the electronic authentication service organization violates the obligation of ensuring the identity of the subject and the confidentiality of the data message, it bears the contract liability to the signer and the tort liability to the relying party. Then, on the basis of the traditional civil law theory of our country and the related theories of Germany and Taiwan, the article further discusses this. The contractual liability of the electronic certification service institution to the signer is embodied in the fact that the electronic certification organization shall bear the responsibility for the fault in the contract when it is damaged by the refusal of service during the contracting process, When the signer is unable to sign or the certificate is illegally used, the certification authority shall bear the responsibility for breach of contract, and the liability for breach of contract shall be dealt with in the event of breach of the contract obligation after the revocation of the certificate. The liability of the electronic authentication service organization meets the four constitutive requirements of the tort liability: the act of violating the law of protecting the third party constitutes an illegal act, which damages the interests of the dependent person and constitutes the fact of damage; There is a causal relationship between the fact of damage and the illegal act; the electronic authentication service organization has intentional damage to the relying person when colluding with the signer, and there is negligence in the absence of collusion. The electronic certification service adopts the principle of presumption of fault to the liability of relying person, the form of liability is supplementary liability, and the principle of limited compensation is adopted.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號(hào)】：D913.99

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 帥興國;電子認(rèn)證之民事責(zé)任與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

2 王志遠(yuǎn);論電子認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)信賴方的民事責(zé)任[D];蘇州大學(xué);2006年

3 孫志煜;電子認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)民事責(zé)任問題研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2007年

4 馬麗萍;電子認(rèn)證法律問題研究[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

5 戚永福;電子簽名認(rèn)證法律責(zé)任承擔(dān)機(jī)制研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

6 楊麗虹;電子認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)侵權(quán)責(zé)任研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

7 吳青鋒;電子簽名認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)的責(zé)任限制研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2161313