【摘要】：船舶優(yōu)先權是海商法特有的一項法律制度,但由于各國的基本法律制度存在差異,因此在船舶優(yōu)先權的行使過程中亦存在沖突,在我國,《海商法》頒布的時間較晚,因而關于船舶優(yōu)先權的理論研究相對來說還不夠成熟,在實踐中常常出現歧義。本文選擇船舶優(yōu)先權制度為研究對象,以我國《海商法》為基礎,結合國際公約和主要海運國家的有關法律,用比較法學的研究方法,對我國船舶優(yōu)先權的立法進行分析評述,并對存在問題提出自己的見解及修改立法建議。 本文第一章簡要介紹了船舶優(yōu)先權起源和諸種學說及船舶優(yōu)先權在各國的發(fā)展狀況,分析了船舶優(yōu)先權發(fā)展的國際統一化趨勢。介紹了英美學者對船舶優(yōu)先權下的定義,分析了我國《海商法》船舶優(yōu)先權定義的含義,指出定義沒有反映船舶優(yōu)先權性質和船舶優(yōu)先權與海事請求是一種擔保與被擔保的關系等缺陷。介紹了英美學者對船舶優(yōu)先權的法律特征的認識,結合我國《海商法》規(guī)定,闡述了船舶優(yōu)先權具有法定性、秘密性、從屬性、追及力、優(yōu)先性、獨立時效性、程序性等法律特征。運用比較方法論證闡述了船舶優(yōu)先權的性質是一種實體權利,一種法定擔保物權,而不是一種債權,更不是一種程序權利。 第二章,分別論述了船舶優(yōu)先權的客體(標的)、主體(權利主體船舶優(yōu)先權人和義務主體船舶優(yōu)先權所擔保的海事請求的被請求人)和內容(船舶優(yōu)先權項目)三要素,結合主要海運國家、國際公約和我國《海商法》有關船舶優(yōu)先權
[Abstract]:Maritime lien is a special legal system of maritime law, but there are conflicts in the exercise of maritime liens because of the differences in the basic legal systems of various countries. In our country, the time of promulgation of Maritime Law is relatively late. Therefore, the theoretical research on maritime liens is relatively immature, and ambiguity often occurs in practice. This paper chooses maritime lien system as the research object, based on the maritime law of our country, combines the international convention and the relevant laws of the major maritime countries, and makes an analysis and comment on the legislation of maritime lien in our country by the method of comparative law. And puts forward own opinion to the existence question and the revision legislation proposal. The first chapter briefly introduces the origin of maritime liens and various theories and the development of maritime liens in various countries, and analyzes the trend of international unification of maritime liens development. This paper introduces the definition of maritime lien by British and American scholars, and analyzes the definition of maritime lien in China. It is pointed out that the definition does not reflect the nature of maritime liens and the relationship between maritime claims and maritime liens. This paper introduces the understanding of the legal characteristics of maritime liens by British and American scholars, combining with the provisions of Maritime Law of our country, expounds that maritime liens have legal nature, secrecy, subordinate attribute, pursuit and force, priority, independent timeliness, etc. Procedural and other legal features. This paper demonstrates that the nature of maritime lien is a kind of substantive right, a kind of legal security right, not a kind of creditor's right, much less a procedural right. The second chapter discusses the object of maritime lien (the object), the subject (the subject of maritime lien and the claimant of maritime claim guaranteed by the subject of maritime lien) and the content (maritime lien item). Combined with major maritime countries, international conventions and maritime laws of China relating to maritime liens
【學位授予單位】：華東政法學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2004
【分類號】：D922.294

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前4條

1 盛萍;從船舶優(yōu)先權特征看船舶優(yōu)先權的統一[D];中國海洋大學;2008年

2 鄭桂平;論船舶優(yōu)先權客體[D];湘潭大學;2008年

3 蔣珊珊;論船舶優(yōu)先權的實現[D];海南大學;2010年

4 宋歌;船舶優(yōu)先權優(yōu)先受償順位研究[D];大連海事大學;2013年

，

本文編號：2151373