本文選題：海事賠償責(zé)任限制程序 + 責(zé)任限制基金　； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2003年碩士論文

【摘要】： 海事賠償責(zé)任限制制度是保護(hù)船舶所有人等海事責(zé)任人利益的重要制度，它將海事責(zé)任人在一次事故中的賠償責(zé)任限制在一定額度之內(nèi)。法律通常規(guī)定海事責(zé)任人享受海事賠償責(zé)任限制的權(quán)利要經(jīng)過特定的程序，因此，完善的海事賠償責(zé)任限制程序是海事責(zé)任人實(shí)現(xiàn)其海事賠償責(zé)任限制權(quán)利的重要保障。 《中華人民共和國海事訴訟特別程序法》結(jié)合我國《海商法》的規(guī)定對設(shè)立海事賠償責(zé)任限制基金程序、債權(quán)登記及受償程序作了比較詳細(xì)的規(guī)定，它是我國第一部專門針對海事賠償責(zé)任限制程序做出規(guī)定的法律，在它開始實(shí)施之前，海事賠償責(zé)任限制案件的審理要依據(jù)《民事訴訟法》的相關(guān)規(guī)定來進(jìn)行，造成了審理上的很多不便。但是《海事訴訟特別程序法》并沒有規(guī)定一個(gè)能完全適應(yīng)海事審判需要的完整的海事賠償責(zé)任限制程序，理論界對其這種立法模式尚存爭議。 本文欲通過對英美法系及大陸法系國家的海事賠償責(zé)任限制程序的介紹，總結(jié)出兩大法系海事賠償責(zé)任限制程序各自的性質(zhì)及特點(diǎn)，并與我國的海事賠償責(zé)任限制程序的相關(guān)規(guī)定加以比較，同時(shí)結(jié)合民法及民事訴訟法的理論對我國的海事賠償責(zé)任限制程序進(jìn)行理論上的分析及定性，以尋找出適合我國海事審判需要的一種海事賠償責(zé)任限制程序的立法模式。本文還希望在參考有關(guān)國家立法及充分考慮我國海事審判實(shí)踐需要的基礎(chǔ)上，指明我國《海事訴訟特別程序法》現(xiàn)有規(guī)定中存在的缺陷，，并針對這些缺陷提出立法建議，以求在完善我國海事賠償責(zé)任限制程序的進(jìn)程中貢獻(xiàn)出個(gè)人的綿薄之力。
[Abstract]:The limitation system of liability for maritime claims is an important system to protect the interests of the maritime responsible persons such as the owner of the ship. It limits the liability of the persons responsible for maritime affairs in an accident to a certain amount. The law generally provides that the right of a maritime liable person to the limitation of liability for maritime claims is subject to a specific procedure, and therefore, The perfect procedure of limitation of liability for maritime claims is an important guarantee for the persons responsible for maritime affairs to realize their rights of limitation of liability for maritime claims. < Sea, people's Republic of China The procedure of establishing a limitation Fund for Maritime claims liability in conjunction with the provisions of the Maritime Law of China, The registration of claims and the procedures for receiving compensation have been stipulated in more detail. It is the first law of our country that specifically regulates the procedure for limiting liability for maritime claims. Before it began to be implemented, The trial of limitation cases of maritime claim liability should be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil procedure Law, resulting in a lot of inconvenience in the trial. However, the Special procedure Law of Maritime Proceedings does not stipulate a complete limitation procedure of maritime liability which can fully meet the needs of maritime trial. By introducing the limitation procedures of liability for maritime claims in the common law system and the civil law system, this paper summarizes the nature and characteristics of the limitation procedures of the liability for maritime claims in the two major legal systems. And compared with the relevant provisions of the limitation procedure of maritime claims liability in our country, combined with the theory of civil law and the civil procedure law, the author makes a theoretical analysis and qualitative analysis on the limitation procedure of maritime claims liability in our country. In order to find out a kind of legislation mode of limitation procedure of maritime claim liability that suits the needs of maritime trial in our country. On the basis of referring to the relevant national legislation and fully considering the needs of maritime trial practice in China, this paper also hopes to point out the defects existing in the existing provisions of the Special procedure Law of Maritime Litigation of our country, and put forward some legislative suggestions for these defects. In order to improve the process of limitation of maritime claims liability in the process of contributing personal efforts.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2003
【分類號】：D925.1;D922.294

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 洪燕;海事賠償責(zé)任限制程序相關(guān)法律問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2011年

2 賀洪龍;海事賠償責(zé)任限制程序問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2007年

3 賈楠;CMI《責(zé)任限制程序規(guī)則指南》對完善我國相關(guān)立法之借鑒[D];大連海事大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：2117529