本文選題：觀念交付 + 觀念交付的價(jià)值��； 參考：《黑龍江大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 我國(guó)《物權(quán)法》已經(jīng)制定完畢并且公布實(shí)施。慶幸的是,觀念交付被寫進(jìn)其中。觀念交付使得交付類型更加的豐富,它之所以被立法者所認(rèn)可完全是為了滿足交易便捷、迅速的需要�！段餀�(quán)法》中明確了觀念交付具有物權(quán)變動(dòng)的效力,但對(duì)觀念交付的其他效力以及如何適用的問題沒有涉及,這為我們?cè)谶壿嫼腕w系結(jié)構(gòu)上探討和研究觀念交付制度留出了更大的空間。 本文著重以動(dòng)產(chǎn)的觀念交付為研究對(duì)象,以觀念交付的概觀、價(jià)值、效力、適用為研究?jī)?nèi)容,其中以觀念交付效力和適用為研究重點(diǎn)。筆者結(jié)合我國(guó)現(xiàn)行立法和德國(guó)、日本以及臺(tái)灣地區(qū)民法,對(duì)觀念交付及其相關(guān)的體系制度進(jìn)行詳盡分析。全文共分緒論、正文、結(jié)論三部分。 第一章:觀念交付之概觀。本章分三節(jié),主要介紹觀念交付的歷史源起和具體類型。本章首先介紹羅馬法時(shí)期觀念交付具體形態(tài)的雛形,出現(xiàn)了替代現(xiàn)實(shí)交付的短手交付、長(zhǎng)手交付、占有協(xié)議三種形式,并對(duì)其表現(xiàn)進(jìn)行詳細(xì)介紹。目的是從歷史發(fā)展的角度來(lái)探析觀念交付制度。接著結(jié)合近現(xiàn)代國(guó)家立法,對(duì)觀念交付具體形態(tài),即簡(jiǎn)易交付、指示交付、占有改定加以介紹。最后,筆者建議尊重間接占有的存在。著重強(qiáng)調(diào)間接占有為觀念交付提供了強(qiáng)有力的理論支撐。 第二章:觀念交付的價(jià)值。本章主要探討觀念交付的效率價(jià)值和安全價(jià)值,以及觀念交付的價(jià)值沖突的認(rèn)識(shí)。首先,從一般意義上剖析效率和安全的法理意義。指出效率存在的價(jià)值在于使資源配置最優(yōu)化,安全存在的價(jià)值則是對(duì)現(xiàn)存利益的維護(hù)。其次,論述觀念交付具有突出的效率價(jià)值,并且強(qiáng)調(diào)觀念交付中效率價(jià)值并不是與所有的安全價(jià)值相沖突,指出效率價(jià)值與安全價(jià)值中的靜的安全價(jià)值相一致,與動(dòng)的安全價(jià)值(交易安全)相矛盾。最后,主張堅(jiān)持追求高效率的同時(shí),采取制度設(shè)計(jì)的辦法來(lái)克服觀念交付的弊端。 第三章:觀念交付的效力。本章從觀念交付的形成力、對(duì)抗力和公信力三個(gè)角度對(duì)觀念交付的效力進(jìn)行全面闡述。筆者認(rèn)為,觀念交付的形成力與其對(duì)抗力的強(qiáng)弱程度成正比,而觀念交付的對(duì)抗力和其公信力的強(qiáng)弱程度成反比。首先,對(duì)意思主義和形式主義物權(quán)變動(dòng)模式進(jìn)行梳理,表明采納不同的模式在發(fā)生物權(quán)變動(dòng)上存在差異。其次,介紹觀念交付的效力主要內(nèi)容。第一,觀念交付的形成力在意思主義和形式主義物權(quán)變動(dòng)模式的國(guó)家一般都予以承認(rèn)。第二,從觀念交付的對(duì)抗力的角度進(jìn)一步對(duì)觀念交付的效力加以詮釋,觀念交付的對(duì)抗力是對(duì)新物權(quán)人的保護(hù),維護(hù)物權(quán)變動(dòng)結(jié)果,防止他人介入對(duì)新形成的物權(quán)關(guān)系加以破壞。第三,對(duì)觀念交付的公信力加以介紹。介紹公示與公信的關(guān)系問題,為了公示瑕疵時(shí)保護(hù)信賴者利益。最后,介紹觀念交付的公示力整體上趨弱,進(jìn)而說(shuō)明觀念交付后,往往公示表征的權(quán)利和實(shí)質(zhì)權(quán)利不一致,使公信力更有了適用的前提,肯定了觀念交付公信力存在的必要性。 第四章:觀念交付的適用。首先,介紹觀念交付在不動(dòng)產(chǎn)變動(dòng)中的適用問題,強(qiáng)調(diào)觀念交付可以存在于不動(dòng)產(chǎn)變動(dòng)過(guò)程中,但只是其中的一個(gè)環(huán)節(jié)。在形式主義立法模式下,登記最終起決定性的作用。其次,介紹觀念交付在善意取得制度中的適用。主張簡(jiǎn)易交付和指示交付可適用于善意取得,而依占有改定方式不能成立善意取得。最后,介紹觀念交付和動(dòng)產(chǎn)質(zhì)權(quán)、留置權(quán)的關(guān)系問題。觀念交付中惟有占有改定不能適用于動(dòng)產(chǎn)質(zhì)權(quán)和留置權(quán),其他兩種形態(tài)可以成立動(dòng)產(chǎn)質(zhì)權(quán)和留置權(quán)。 第五章:結(jié)論。對(duì)全文做最后總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:Our country's property law has been formulated and published. Fortunately, conceptual delivery is written in it. Concept delivery makes the delivery type more rich. It is recognized by the legislator to meet the convenience of the transaction and the rapid need. The other effects of delivery and the problem of how to apply are not involved, which has left more space for us to explore and study the system of conceptual delivery in logic and architecture.
This paper focuses on the delivery of the concept of movable property as the research object, with the introduction, value, effectiveness and application of concept delivery as the research content. The research focuses on the effectiveness and application of concept delivery. The author makes a detailed analysis of the concept delivery and related system system in combination with the current legislation of our country and the civil law of Germany, Japan and Taiwan. The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion.
The first chapter is an overview of the concept delivery. This chapter is divided into three sections. This chapter mainly introduces the historical origin and specific types of concept delivery. This chapter first introduces the embryonic form of the concrete delivery of the concept of the Rome law period, the short hand delivery of replacement reality delivery, the long hand delivery, the possession of the three forms of possession, and the detailed introduction of its performance. The purpose is from the purpose of the chapter. In the view of the historical development, the concept delivery system is analyzed. Then, combining the modern national legislation, the concept delivery is presented in a specific form, namely, simple delivery, instruction delivery, and possession modification. Finally, the author suggests respect for the existence of indirect possession.
The second chapter: the value of concept delivery. This chapter mainly discusses the efficiency value and safety value of concept delivery, as well as the understanding of the value conflict in concept delivery. First, it analyzes the legal meaning of efficiency and safety in general meaning. It points out that the value of efficiency lies in the optimization of the allocation of resources, and the value of the existence of security is to the existing interests. Secondly, it is pointed out that the concept delivery has outstanding efficiency value, and emphasizes that the efficiency value of the concept delivery is not conflicted with all the safety values, points out that the efficiency value is consistent with the static security value in the safety value, and contradicts the dynamic safety value (transaction safety). Finally, it advocates insisting on the pursuit of high efficiency. In order to overcome the drawbacks of conceptual delivery, we adopt institutional design.
The third chapter: the effectiveness of concept delivery. This chapter expounds the effectiveness of concept delivery from the three angles of the formative force, antagonism and credibility of concept delivery. The author believes that the formative force of concept delivery is directly proportional to the strength and strength of resistance, and the antagonism of conceptual delivery is inversely proportional to the strength of its credibility. The pattern of the change of idealism and formalism property right shows that there are differences in the change of real right in the adoption of different modes. Secondly, the main content of the effectiveness of concept delivery is introduced. First, the formative force of conceptual delivery is generally acknowledged in the states of the mode of change of meaning and formalism. Second, from the concept of delivery. The angle of antagonism further interprets the effectiveness of the concept delivery. The antagonism of the concept delivery is the protection of the new real right person, the maintenance of the result of the change of real right, and the prevention of the involvement of others to destroy the newly formed real right relationship. Third, introduce the credibility of the concept delivery. It protects the interests of the trustor when it is defective. Finally, it introduces the overall weakness of the public indication of concept delivery, and then shows that after the delivery of the concept, the right of public representation is often not consistent with the substantive rights, which makes the public credibility more applicable, and affirms the necessity of the existence of the public faith in concept delivery.
The fourth chapter: the application of concept delivery. First, it introduces the application of concept delivery in the change of real estate, emphasizes that concept delivery can exist in the process of real estate change, but it is only one of the links. In the formalist legislative mode, registration eventually plays a decisive role. Secondly, the introduction of concept delivery in the bona fide acquisition system It holds that simple delivery and directive delivery can be applied to bona fide acquisition, but the acquisition of good faith can not be established in the way of possession modification. Finally, it introduces the relationship between the concept delivery and the pledge of movable property and the lien right. The only possession in the concept delivery can not be applied to the pledge and retention of movable property, and the other two forms can set up the pledge of chattel. And lien right.
The fifth chapter: conclusion. The final summary of the full text.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D923.2

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 顧金偉;占有改定情形下善意取得的適用問題研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2011年

2 車軼新;觀念交付下的善意取得[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1924526