本文選題：股東會 + 可撤銷決議��； 參考：《廈門大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：股東會決議在公司的整體運作過程中十分重要,因此,《中華人民共和國公司法》在公司股東會召開、形成公司意思等方面都有相應制度和規(guī)則,這些制度和規(guī)則有利于公司的意思和決議得以公平公正的形成。但實踐中,股東會決議的形成操作總會存在一些程序或內(nèi)容上的瑕疵,這些瑕疵,必然在某種程度上損害公司股東或者第三者的利益。 股東會決議瑕疵救濟制度作為對瑕疵股東會決議的一種救濟,被世界各國廣泛采用,其目的在于通過制度救濟來保證股東會決議的合法性和合理性,也使公司、股東及利害關(guān)系人的利益得到保證。鑒于一套完善的股東會決議瑕疵救濟制度對于公司在市場經(jīng)濟中正常運轉(zhuǎn)的重要性,本文通過對股東會決議瑕疵救濟制度進行系統(tǒng)研究,同時結(jié)合司法實踐中存在的問題,試圖發(fā)現(xiàn)我國股東會決議瑕疵救濟制度中存在哪些需要改進之處,爾后加以分析,并借鑒國外或者國內(nèi)其他法域內(nèi)的相關(guān)立法,為我國該項制度的完善提出可行性建議,使之更加符合社會發(fā)展和司法實踐的需要。 除引言和結(jié)語外,文章分為四個章節(jié)： 第一部分介紹了股東會決議瑕疵的基本理論。首先,論述了股東會決議瑕疵的界定、成因及類型。其次,承上啟下地對股東會決議瑕疵的救濟途徑進行了簡要介紹。 第二部分論述了股東會決議的撤銷問題。一方面通過比較法分析,比較我國和國外先進制度間的差異；另一方面歸納了決議撤銷的事由,并系統(tǒng)地論述可撤銷決議的救濟途徑及不同救濟方式的具體適用條件。 第三部分論述了股東會決議的無效問題。首先介紹了世界各國的相關(guān)立法、司法和學說,比較我國和先進制度間的差異；其次歸納了決議無效的事由,并闡述無效決議的救濟途徑及不同救濟方式的具體適用條件。 第四部分對我國股東會決議瑕疵救濟制度的不足之處提出了完善的建議。從我國司法實證角度入手,就北大法寶所載的近13年有關(guān)股東會決議瑕疵糾紛的案例進行統(tǒng)計分析,歸納出我國司法審判實踐中存在的問題,有針對性地提出了完善我國股東會決議瑕疵訴訟救濟制度的若干建議。
[Abstract]:The resolution of the shareholders' meeting is very important in the whole operation of the company. Therefore, the Company Law of the people's Republic of China has corresponding systems and rules for the convening of the shareholders' meeting and the formation of the meaning of the company. These systems and rules are conducive to the fair and equitable formation of the company's intentions and decisions. However, in practice, there are always some defects in the procedure or content of the shareholders' resolution, which will inevitably damage the interests of the shareholders or the third party to some extent. As a kind of relief to the resolution of defective shareholders' meeting, the system of shareholders' resolution is widely used by countries all over the world. Its purpose is to guarantee the legitimacy and rationality of the resolution of shareholders' meeting through system relief, and also to make the company, The interests of shareholders and interested parties are guaranteed. In view of the importance of a set of perfect remedy system for shareholders' resolution defects to the normal operation of the company in the market economy, this paper makes a systematic study on the remedy system of shareholders' resolution defects, and at the same time combines with the problems existing in judicial practice. This paper tries to find out what needs to be improved in the remedy system of shareholders' resolution defects, and then analyzes it, and draws lessons from the relevant legislation in foreign or other domestic jurisdictions, and puts forward some feasible suggestions for the perfection of this system in our country. Make it more in line with the needs of social development and judicial practice. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the article is divided into four chapters: The first part introduces the basic theory of shareholders' resolution defect. First, it discusses the definition, causes and types of shareholders' resolution defects. Secondly, it briefly introduces the remedy ways of shareholders' resolution defect. The second part discusses the cancellation of shareholders' meeting resolution. On the one hand, through comparative analysis, the differences between China and foreign advanced systems are compared; on the other hand, the reasons of resolution revocation are summarized, and the relief ways of revocable resolutions and the specific applicable conditions of different relief methods are systematically discussed. The third part discusses the invalidity of shareholders'meeting resolution. Firstly, it introduces the relevant legislation, judicature and doctrine of the world, compares the difference between our country and the advanced system; secondly, summarizes the reason of the invalidation of the resolution, and expounds the relief ways of the invalid resolution and the specific applicable conditions of the different relief methods. The fourth part puts forward the perfect suggestion to the defect remedy system of the shareholders' meeting in our country. From the angle of judicial demonstration in our country, this paper makes a statistical analysis on the cases concerning the defect disputes of shareholders' meeting resolutions in the past 13 years, and concludes the problems existing in the judicial practice of our country. Some suggestions are put forward to perfect the remedy system of the resolution of shareholders' meeting in our country.
【學位授予單位】：廈門大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 姜山;;公司機關(guān)決議瑕疵訴訟若干法律問題探析[J];法律適用;2011年08期

2 丁勇;;德國公司決議瑕疵訴訟濫用問題研究及啟示[J];比較法研究;2013年04期

3 張民安;公司股東的表決權(quán)[J];法學研究;2004年02期

4 蔡立東;公司治理中的“多數(shù)派暴政”問題[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2003年05期

5 李建偉;;公司決議效力瑕疵類型及其救濟體系再構(gòu)建——以股東大會決議可撤銷為中心[J];商事法論集;2008年02期

6 陳群峰;;論公司決議瑕疵的司法介入——以保持司法干預與公司自治的平衡為視角[J];首都師范大學學報(社會科學版);2013年05期

7 李建偉;;論公司決議可撤銷的適用事由——基于司法適用立場的立法解釋[J];浙江社會科學;2009年08期

，

本文編號：1842041