本文選題：網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商　切入點(diǎn)：過錯(cuò)責(zé)任　出處：《寧波大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商是不可忽視的網(wǎng)絡(luò)主體,其侵權(quán)責(zé)任的承擔(dān),以過錯(cuò)責(zé)任為限,已成共識(shí)。但網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商過錯(cuò)責(zé)任如何認(rèn)定?責(zé)任受到何種限制?目前尚無定論。本文結(jié)合網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商侵權(quán)責(zé)任的變遷,分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的過錯(cuò)判定及責(zé)任的承擔(dān)。 第一部分,通過分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的各種不同分類,在討論網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)中服務(wù)商的責(zé)任時(shí),將服務(wù)商的服務(wù)類型分為提供接入服務(wù)、內(nèi)容服務(wù)、平臺(tái)服務(wù)三大類。提供不同服務(wù)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商,其侵權(quán)責(zé)任認(rèn)定也有所不同。國際的立法趨勢表明,網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商在網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)中承擔(dān)過錯(cuò)責(zé)任,有利于信息傳播和技術(shù)進(jìn)步,有其必然性和合理性。 第二部分,結(jié)合傳統(tǒng)侵權(quán)法理論分析,網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商過錯(cuò)的認(rèn)定應(yīng)當(dāng)采取客觀標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商違反注意義務(wù),即存在過錯(cuò)。網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商在提供接入服務(wù)、內(nèi)容服務(wù)、平臺(tái)服務(wù)時(shí)對(duì)信息控制能力不同,應(yīng)承擔(dān)的注意義務(wù)也不同。 第三部分,分析停止侵害、消除影響、賠禮道歉、賠償損失等主要責(zé)任承擔(dān)方式在網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)中適用的特殊性。結(jié)合立法對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商責(zé)任進(jìn)行限制的趨勢,分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商法定免責(zé)事由、合同免責(zé)、免責(zé)聲明等不同的責(zé)任限制方式的優(yōu)劣。 第四部分,分析我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商侵權(quán)責(zé)任的立法現(xiàn)狀,結(jié)合其他國家和地區(qū)的立法例,對(duì)完善我國的相關(guān)立法提出明確網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商概念、完善過錯(cuò)判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商責(zé)任作進(jìn)一步限制等建議,對(duì)侵權(quán)責(zé)任法的相關(guān)條文進(jìn)行評(píng)析。
[Abstract]:The network service provider is the network main body which can not be ignored, its tort liability is limited by the fault liability, has already become the consensus.But how to identify the fault liability of network service provider?What are the limitations on liability?There is no conclusion yet.Combined with the change of tort liability of network service provider, this paper analyzes the fault judgment and liability assumption of network service provider.In the first part, by analyzing the different categories of network service providers, when discussing the liability of service providers in network infringement, the service types of service providers are divided into three categories: access service, content service and platform service.Network service providers provide different services, their tort liability is also different.The trend of international legislation shows that network service providers bear fault liability in network infringement, which is beneficial to information dissemination and technological progress, and has its inevitability and rationality.In the second part, combined with the theory of traditional tort law, the identification of fault of network service provider should adopt objective standard.Network service providers violate the duty of care, that is, there is fault.When providing access service, content service and platform service, the network service provider has different ability to control information, and should bear different duty of attention.The third part analyzes the particularity of stopping infringement, eliminating influence, apologizing, compensating for loss and so on.Combined with the trend of legislation to restrict the liability of network service providers, this paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the different ways of limiting the liability of network service providers, such as legal reasons, contract disclaimers, disclaimers, and so on.In the fourth part, the author analyzes the legislation status of tort liability of network service provider in our country. Combining with the legislation of other countries and regions, it puts forward a clear concept of network service provider and perfect the standard of fault judgment to perfect the relevant legislation of our country.Some suggestions such as further limitation of network service provider's liability are proposed, and the relevant provisions of tort liability law are evaluated.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 趙健杰;淺論網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1702053