本文選題：公司治理　切入點：法定代表人　出處：《西南政法大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著現(xiàn)代公司的不斷發(fā)展，公司制度在商法制度領(lǐng)域的作用越來越重要，對公司的研究也從靜態(tài)的制度層面推進到了靜態(tài)與動態(tài)相結(jié)合的公司治理的層面。公司代表人制度作為公司重要的公司法人制度之一，公司代表人作為的公司治理的重要組成部門，與公司治理有著密切的聯(lián)系。公司代表人制度通過影響公司內(nèi)部機構(gòu)的權(quán)利、義務和責任來影響公司治理，進而影響到公司效益的實現(xiàn)。本文以公司代表人制度為研究對象，以公司治理為研究視角，從以下四個方面對公司代表人制度進行論述： 第一部分是公司代表人制度概述。具體分為兩個方面：一方面是比較分析公司代表人和公司法定代表人制度。從分析公司代表人和公司法定代表人的定義入手，進而分析公司代表人與公司法定代表人的聯(lián)系與區(qū)別，并進一步分析了公司代表人的理論基礎(chǔ)，即公司代理理論和代表理論；另一方面是比較分析境內(nèi)外有關(guān)公司代表人的確定模式和分析我國法定代表人制度的發(fā)展歷程和特點，以為后文的比較借鑒境外先進制度打好理論依據(jù)和基礎(chǔ)。 第二部分是闡述公司代表人制度在公司治理中的地位和作用。首先，簡要的論述了公司治理的定義、原則和機制。其次，明確了公司代表人制度在公司治理中的法律地位，論述了公司代表人制度是公司治理的重要組成部分，公司代表人制度是公司治理的緣由。再次，論述公司代表人制度對公司治理產(chǎn)生的作用，分別論述了公司代表人制度設(shè)計對公司治理效益的影響和對公司治理理念的體現(xiàn)。最后，回歸到我國現(xiàn)行的公司法定代表人制度對公司治理的沖擊的論述上，從公司治理理念、治理原則、權(quán)力義務配置三個方面論述了現(xiàn)行公司代表人制度對公司治理的巨大沖擊。 第三部分是比較分析境內(nèi)外關(guān)于公司代表人的義務和責任的規(guī)定。一是分析了公司代表人的善管義務和忠實義務，重點分析了臺灣、美國、日本、德國、英國、法國等相關(guān)國家對這兩項義務的規(guī)定，分析得出我國對善管義務的規(guī)定的缺失和在忠實義務方面存在著內(nèi)容上的不完善。二是重點分析了臺灣、日本、歐盟等國家和地區(qū)對公司代表人責任的相關(guān)規(guī)定，，比較分析得出我國公司代表人制度在對第三人責任方面存在缺失。 第四部分是對完善我國公司代表人制度方面的建議。重點從公司代表人制度設(shè)計的理念，公司代表人法律制度的移植，公司董事長、董事會、經(jīng)理三者之間的分權(quán)與制衡，公司代表人的義務和責任四個方面進行了分析，提出了完善的建議。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of modern companies, the role of corporate system in the field of commercial law system is becoming more and more important. The research on the company has also advanced from the static system level to the static and dynamic level of corporate governance. As one of the important corporate systems, the corporate representative system is one of the most important corporate systems. As an important component of corporate governance, corporate representatives are closely related to corporate governance. The corporate representative system influences corporate governance by influencing the rights, obligations and responsibilities of the company's internal institutions. This paper takes the corporate representative system as the research object, takes the corporate governance as the research angle, discusses the company representative system from the following four aspects:. The first part is an overview of the company representative system. It is divided into two aspects: one is the comparative analysis of the company representative and the company legal representative system. From the analysis of the definition of the company representative and the company legal representative, Then it analyzes the relationship and difference between the company representative and the company legal representative, and further analyzes the theoretical basis of the company representative, that is, the company agent theory and the representative theory. On the other hand, it makes a comparative analysis of the determination mode of the representative of domestic and foreign companies and the development process and characteristics of the legal representative system of our country, so as to lay a good theoretical basis and foundation for the later comparison and reference of foreign advanced systems. The second part is to expound the position and function of corporate representative system in corporate governance. Firstly, it briefly discusses the definition, principle and mechanism of corporate governance. Secondly, it clarifies the legal status of corporate representative system in corporate governance. This paper discusses that the company representative system is an important part of corporate governance, and the company representative system is the reason of corporate governance. This paper discusses the impact of the company representative system design on the corporate governance benefit and the embodiment of the corporate governance concept respectively. Finally, it returns to the impact of the current corporate legal representative system on the corporate governance, and discusses the corporate governance concept from the point of view of corporate governance. This paper discusses the great impact of the current representative system on corporate governance from three aspects: the principle of governance and the allocation of power and obligation. The third part is a comparative analysis of the obligations and responsibilities of corporate representatives at home and abroad. One is to analyze the obligations of good management and loyalty of corporate representatives, focusing on Taiwan, the United States, Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom. France and other relevant countries' provisions on these two obligations, analysis of the lack of good management obligations of China and the obligations of loyalty in the content of the imperfections. Second, the focus of the analysis of Taiwan, Japan, European Union and other countries and regions on the responsibility of corporate representatives, comparative analysis of the system in China in the third party liability deficiencies. The fourth part is to perfect our country company representative system aspect suggestion, from the company representative system design idea, the company representative legal system transplant, the company chairman, the board of directors, the manager three separation of powers and checks and balances, The obligations and responsibilities of the representative of the company are analyzed in four aspects, and the perfect suggestions are put forward.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 彭誠信;對法人若干基本理論的批判[J];吉林大學社會科學學報;1998年05期

本文編號：1657159