本文選題：中國(guó)　切入點(diǎn)：哈薩克斯坦　出處：《新疆大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：國(guó)際貨物貿(mào)易作為國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)最傳統(tǒng)的表現(xiàn)形式,一直備受關(guān)注,早在國(guó)際貨物貿(mào)易發(fā)展之初,人們便根據(jù)長(zhǎng)期的貿(mào)易實(shí)踐活動(dòng),形成了規(guī)范國(guó)際貨物貿(mào)易的各種規(guī)則。最初規(guī)范國(guó)際貨物貿(mào)易的規(guī)則是商人習(xí)慣法,后來(lái)隨著資本主義的形成和發(fā)展,資本主義各國(guó)的民法和商法逐漸吸納了商人習(xí)慣法,成為規(guī)范國(guó)際貨物貿(mào)易的主要規(guī)則。之后,統(tǒng)一的國(guó)際貨物貿(mào)易規(guī)則在規(guī)范國(guó)際貨物貿(mào)易活動(dòng)中所起的作用越來(lái)越重要,進(jìn)而形成了目前國(guó)內(nèi)法和國(guó)際法規(guī)則并駕齊驅(qū)的局面。其中,學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)于國(guó)際規(guī)則的研究,主要從國(guó)際政治、國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)、國(guó)際法等角度進(jìn)行探索,本文則是從國(guó)際法中條約法的視角,以中哈貨物貿(mào)易條約為主要研究對(duì)象,對(duì)中哈貨物貿(mào)易條約理論和實(shí)踐問(wèn)題進(jìn)行探討,從而為中哈貨物貿(mào)易條約的發(fā)展和完善提出幾點(diǎn)拙見(jiàn)。文章分為四部分,其主要內(nèi)容如下:第一部分國(guó)際貨物貿(mào)易條約簡(jiǎn)介。簡(jiǎn)單闡述了國(guó)際貨物貿(mào)易條約產(chǎn)生前后國(guó)際貿(mào)易規(guī)則的發(fā)展。在此基礎(chǔ)上,簡(jiǎn)略地分析了國(guó)際貨物貿(mào)易條約的概念、特征、基本內(nèi)容、及當(dāng)今新時(shí)期發(fā)生的變化。第二部分中哈貨物貿(mào)易條約的歷史與現(xiàn)狀。該部分重點(diǎn)闡述的是中哈貨物貿(mào)易條約的類(lèi)別與創(chuàng)建的基本法律制度,前者根據(jù)條約與貨物貿(mào)易的關(guān)聯(lián)度,將中哈貨物貿(mào)易條約分為專(zhuān)門(mén)性、非專(zhuān)門(mén)性和特殊類(lèi)型等三類(lèi)形式;后者則以相關(guān)法律制度的適用性,將中哈貨物貿(mào)易條約創(chuàng)建的法律制度分為普遍性和特殊性?xún)煞N法律制度,并分別進(jìn)行闡述。第三部分中哈貨物貿(mào)易條約內(nèi)容和實(shí)施中存在的問(wèn)題。通過(guò)對(duì)中哈貨物貿(mào)易條約的文獻(xiàn)研究和實(shí)踐調(diào)查,發(fā)現(xiàn)其內(nèi)容中存在的問(wèn)題主要是相關(guān)的術(shù)語(yǔ)和解釋性條款相對(duì)匱乏,部分條約宣言性?xún)?nèi)容較多,缺乏實(shí)質(zhì)性的實(shí)施內(nèi)容;其實(shí)施中的問(wèn)題主要是監(jiān)督機(jī)制不健全,條約的沖突、不履行義務(wù)的救濟(jì)等相關(guān)規(guī)定太過(guò)單薄。第四部分在第三部分的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)中哈貨物貿(mào)易條約的內(nèi)容和實(shí)施中存在的問(wèn)題提出相應(yīng)的完善建議,期望能夠?qū)χ泄浳镔Q(mào)易條約的構(gòu)建和兩國(guó)貨物貿(mào)易的發(fā)展有所裨益。
[Abstract]:As the most traditional form of international economy, international trade in goods has always been concerned. As early as the beginning of the development of international trade in goods, people have been based on long-term trade practice. At first, the rules governing international trade in goods were the customary law of businessmen. Later, with the formation and development of capitalism, the civil and commercial laws of capitalist countries gradually absorbed the customary law of businessmen. The uniform rules of international trade in goods play a more and more important role in regulating international trade in goods. This has created a situation in which domestic laws and rules of international law go hand in hand. Among them, the academic research on international rules is mainly explored from the perspectives of international politics, international economy, international law, and so on. This paper, from the perspective of treaty law in international law, takes the Sino-Kazakh goods trade treaty as the main research object, and discusses the theory and practice of the Sino-Kazakh goods trade treaty. The article is divided into four parts. The main contents are as follows: the first part is a brief introduction to the international trade treaties in goods. The development of international trade rules before and after the emergence of international trade in goods treaties is briefly described. On this basis, the concept and characteristics of international trade treaties in goods are briefly analyzed. The second part deals with the history and present situation of the Sino-Kazakh goods trade treaty. This part focuses on the categories of the Sino-Kazakh goods trade treaty and the basic legal system that was created. According to the relationship between the treaty and the trade in goods, the former divides the Sino-Kazakh goods trade treaty into three types: special, non-specialized and special type; the latter is applicable to the relevant legal system. The legal system created by the Sino-Kazakh goods trade treaty is divided into two legal systems, namely, universality and particularity. The third part is about the contents and problems in the implementation of the Sino-Kazakh goods trade treaty. Through the literature research and practice investigation on the Sino-Kazakh goods trade treaty, It is found that the main problems in its content are the relative scarcity of relevant terms and interpretative clauses, the relatively large number of declarative contents of some treaties and the lack of substantive implementation content; the main problems in its implementation are the unsound monitoring mechanism and the conflict of treaties. Relief for non-performance of obligations and other relevant provisions are too thin. Part 4th, on the basis of the third part, puts forward corresponding suggestions to improve the content and problems in the implementation of the Sino-Kazakh goods Trade Treaty. It is expected to be beneficial to the construction of the Sino-Kazakh goods trade treaty and the development of the goods trade between the two countries.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D996.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬爾科姆.查默斯;伯納多.馬里亞尼;;聯(lián)合國(guó)武器貿(mào)易條約倡議(英文)[J];和平與發(fā)展;2011年06期

2 李維維;曹慧;;聯(lián)合國(guó)《武器貿(mào)易條約》及其對(duì)中國(guó)的影響[J];現(xiàn)代國(guó)際關(guān)系;2014年02期

3 常懷立;雙邊及多邊貿(mào)易條約和協(xié)定是怎么一回事?[J];求是;2000年20期

4 管彥忠;;接受自由貿(mào)易條約的發(fā)展中國(guó)家都面臨困境[J];國(guó)外理論動(dòng)態(tài);2008年04期

5 伊麗莎白·柯卡姆;劉毅強(qiáng);湯瀟敏;;《武器貿(mào)易條約》談判進(jìn)程——中國(guó)政策演變與談判未來(lái)發(fā)展[J];國(guó)際展望;2013年02期

6 索志英;;論《武器貿(mào)易條約》中的大國(guó)博弈[J];湖北函授大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年09期

7 劉毅強(qiáng);;《武器貿(mào)易條約》流產(chǎn)幕后 美國(guó)臨陣倒戈[J];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)周刊;2012年40期

8 馬爾科姆·查默斯;伯納多·馬里亞尼;;聯(lián)合國(guó)武器貿(mào)易條約倡議[J];和平與發(fā)展;2011年06期

9 ;酷博[J];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)周刊;2012年41期

10 宿景祥;;世界大事綜覽[J];國(guó)際研究參考;2013年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 梁一婷;《武器貿(mào)易條約》為何難產(chǎn)？[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào)海外版;2012年

2 中國(guó)軍控與裁軍協(xié)會(huì)副會(huì)長(zhǎng)兼秘書(shū)長(zhǎng) 黎弘;《武器貿(mào)易條約》前景如何？[N];解放軍報(bào);2013年

3 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)國(guó)際法教授 朱文奇;緣何制訂武器貿(mào)易條約[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

4 上海對(duì)外貿(mào)易學(xué)院 法學(xué)院學(xué)者 毛瑞鵬;《武器貿(mào)易條約》的特點(diǎn)和缺陷[N];東方早報(bào);2013年

5 南方日?qǐng)?bào)駐京記者 魏香鏡;打擊非法武器交易 《武器貿(mào)易條約》能給力么？[N];南方日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

6 特約撰稿 北京大學(xué)法學(xué)博士、經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)博士后 林海;《武器貿(mào)易條約》年底將生效[N];民主與法制時(shí)報(bào);2014年

7 天天;聯(lián)合國(guó)通過(guò)《武器貿(mào)易條約》[N];中國(guó)國(guó)防報(bào);2013年

8 上海對(duì)外貿(mào)易學(xué)院法學(xué)院學(xué)者 毛瑞鵬;中美俄對(duì)“武器貿(mào)易條約”的立場(chǎng)[N];東方早報(bào);2012年

9 阿蘭·博伊德;軍備貿(mào)易條約背后隱藏激烈博弈[N];世界報(bào);2007年

10 記者 蔣菡;中國(guó)企業(yè)成立光伏發(fā)電促進(jìn)聯(lián)盟[N];工人日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 周文瑞;中國(guó)與哈薩克斯坦貨物貿(mào)易條約研究[D];新疆大學(xué);2017年

2 任明溪;《武器貿(mào)易條約》研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2014年

3 劉婷燕;論《武器貿(mào)易條約》對(duì)常規(guī)武器的國(guó)際法規(guī)制[D];外交學(xué)院;2014年

4 龍跡;國(guó)際武器貿(mào)易法律規(guī)制研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2014年

5 葉素和;泰國(guó)對(duì)外貨物貿(mào)易管理法及其對(duì)中國(guó)法完善的啟示[D];西南政法大學(xué);2003年

6 扈曉雨;武器貿(mào)易的法律規(guī)制問(wèn)題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2014年

7 魏萌;從《武器貿(mào)易條約》看國(guó)際常規(guī)武器轉(zhuǎn)讓控制進(jìn)程[D];外交學(xué)院;2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1632242