本文選題：《UNCITRAL貨物運(yùn)輸法草案》　切入點(diǎn)：貨物控制權(quán)　出處：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：海運(yùn)貨物控制權(quán)是伴隨國(guó)際貿(mào)易和運(yùn)輸?shù)陌l(fā)展而產(chǎn)生的一項(xiàng)嶄新的制度,聯(lián)合國(guó)國(guó)際貿(mào)易法委員會(huì)(UNCITRAL)委托國(guó)際海事委員會(huì)(CMI)起草的運(yùn)輸法草案中,就對(duì)這一嶄新的制度進(jìn)行了規(guī)定。關(guān)于貨物控制權(quán)的內(nèi)容、性質(zhì)、主體、行使及轉(zhuǎn)讓等問(wèn)題,運(yùn)輸法草案的規(guī)定并非完善,在各界都還頗有爭(zhēng)議,草案也仍有被修改的可能。本文以《UNCITRAL貨物運(yùn)輸法草案》中有關(guān)貨物控制權(quán)的規(guī)定為基礎(chǔ),對(duì)國(guó)際海上貨物運(yùn)輸中的控制權(quán)進(jìn)行了分析研究,對(duì)草案規(guī)定中的不合理之處提出了自己的意見(jiàn),并在借鑒草案成功之處的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國(guó)的立法現(xiàn)狀和司法實(shí)踐,對(duì)在我國(guó)《海商法》中引入貨物控制權(quán)制度提出了建議。 本文第一章分析了海運(yùn)貨物控制權(quán)產(chǎn)生的原因,并對(duì)之進(jìn)行了定義。海運(yùn)貨物控制權(quán)受到重視,是因?yàn)槠洚a(chǎn)生迎合了國(guó)際貿(mào)易法對(duì)運(yùn)輸法提出的新要求以及海運(yùn)方式和運(yùn)輸單證發(fā)展的需要,它的出現(xiàn)也適應(yīng)了司法實(shí)踐的迫切需求。 第二章以《UNCITRAL貨物運(yùn)輸法草案》中有關(guān)貨物控制權(quán)的規(guī)定為基礎(chǔ),對(duì)國(guó)際海上貨物運(yùn)輸中的控制權(quán)進(jìn)行了分析研究,并在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)《UNCITRAL貨物運(yùn)輸法草案》中的不合理的規(guī)定提出了修改建議。 第三章分析了海運(yùn)貨物控制權(quán)與運(yùn)輸單證的關(guān)系。海上貨物運(yùn)輸通常都會(huì)涉及到運(yùn)輸單證的簽發(fā)和轉(zhuǎn)讓,而簽發(fā)不同的運(yùn)輸單證應(yīng)該適用不同的規(guī)則。本文按照未簽發(fā)任何可轉(zhuǎn)讓運(yùn)輸單證或電子運(yùn)輸記錄、簽發(fā)可轉(zhuǎn)讓運(yùn)輸單證、簽發(fā)可轉(zhuǎn)讓電子運(yùn)輸記錄三種情況,分析了在這三種情況下貨物控制權(quán)的行使主體、行使方式及其轉(zhuǎn)讓。 第四章對(duì)海運(yùn)貨物控制權(quán)和中途停運(yùn)權(quán)進(jìn)行了比較分析。雖然中途停運(yùn)權(quán)是貿(mào)易法中的概念,但是海運(yùn)貨物控制權(quán)的產(chǎn)生卻與該制度密切相關(guān),它們之間存在著緊密的聯(lián)系。同時(shí),它們也是不同的法律制度,有很大的區(qū)別。對(duì)這兩種制度進(jìn)行比較分析,有助于更加準(zhǔn)確地掌握海運(yùn)貨物控制權(quán)制度。 第五章在借鑒《UNCITRAL貨物運(yùn)輸法草案》成功之處的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國(guó)的立法現(xiàn)狀和司法實(shí)踐,對(duì)我國(guó)《海商法》中引入貨物控制權(quán)制度提出了建議。
[Abstract]:The right of control of goods by sea is a new system which comes into being with the development of international trade and transport. The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) has entrusted the International Maritime Commission (CMI) with the preparation of the draft Law on Transport, which was prepared by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). Regarding the content, nature, subject, exercise and transfer of the right of control of the goods, the provisions of the draft Transport Law are not perfect and are still controversial in all walks of life. The draft is still possible to be amended. Based on the provisions of the draft of the UNCITRAL Law on the right of Control of goods, this paper analyzes and studies the right of control in the international carriage of goods by sea. The author puts forward his own opinions on the irrationality of the draft, and on the basis of drawing lessons from the success of the draft, combining with the present legislative situation and judicial practice of our country, puts forward some suggestions for introducing the system of control over goods in China's Maritime Law. In the first chapter of this paper, the author analyzes the causes of maritime cargo control, and defines it. Because it meets the new requirements of international trade law on transport law and the need of the development of shipping mode and transport document, it also meets the urgent need of judicial practice. The second chapter analyzes the right of control in the international carriage of goods by sea on the basis of the provisions of the draft Law on the Carriage of goods of UNCITRAL. On the basis of this, some suggestions are put forward to amend the unreasonable provisions in the draft of the UNCITRAL Law on the Carriage of goods. The third chapter analyzes the relationship between the right of control of maritime cargo and the transport document. The carriage of goods by sea usually involves the issuance and transfer of the transport document. Different rules should apply to the issuance of different transport documents. In this paper, there are three situations in which no negotiable transport document or electronic transport record is issued, a negotiable transport document is issued, and a negotiable electronic transport record is issued. This paper analyzes the subject, mode of exercise and transfer of the right of control of goods under these three conditions. Chapter 4th makes a comparative analysis of the right of control and stoppage of seaborne cargo. Although the right of stoppage is a concept in trade law, the emergence of the right of control of seaborne cargo is closely related to this system. At the same time, they are also different legal systems, there are great differences. A comparative analysis of the two systems is helpful to grasp the maritime cargo control system more accurately. On the basis of drawing lessons from the success of the draft of UNCITRAL cargo Transport Law and combining the current legislative situation and judicial practice of our country, Chapter 5th puts forward some suggestions on the introduction of the system of control over goods in Maritime Law of China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：D996.19;D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李志文;論水路貨物運(yùn)輸中托運(yùn)人的貨物處置權(quán)──兼論《合同法》第308條的適用[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2001年09期

2 司玉琢;UNCITRAL運(yùn)輸法(草案)難點(diǎn)問(wèn)題研究[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年01期

3 岑彩云;在國(guó)際貿(mào)易中未受款賣方的權(quán)利[J];對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)實(shí)務(wù);1996年03期

4 邢海寶;;論中途停運(yùn)權(quán)[J];法學(xué)家;1998年03期

5 李勤昌;海運(yùn)托運(yùn)人貨物請(qǐng)求權(quán)認(rèn)定問(wèn)題研究[J];黑龍江對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào);2004年12期

6 張陽(yáng);托運(yùn)人中途停運(yùn)權(quán)之研究──兼論對(duì)《中華人民共和國(guó)合同法》第308條之理解[J];世界海運(yùn);2001年01期

7 潘靜,張潔;《合同法》下海運(yùn)托運(yùn)人變更運(yùn)輸合同之權(quán)利相關(guān)問(wèn)題探討[J];世界海運(yùn);2001年05期

8 趙亮;海運(yùn)貨物控制權(quán)之研[J];世界海運(yùn);2003年05期

9 劉昕;海運(yùn)貨物控制權(quán)問(wèn)題研究——兼評(píng)UNCITRAL運(yùn)輸法草案第11章的規(guī)定[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年02期

10 王曉昀;從中途停運(yùn)權(quán)看《合同法》對(duì)承運(yùn)人的影響[J];中國(guó)遠(yuǎn)洋航務(wù)公告;1999年11期

，

本文編號(hào)：1589987