本文選題：反壟斷　切入點(diǎn)：電信　出處：《蘇州大學(xué)》2003年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 電信業(yè)在一國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)中居于基礎(chǔ)地位，電信改革事關(guān)國(guó)計(jì)民生。電信業(yè)如何由壟斷走向競(jìng)爭(zhēng)，值得經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家和法學(xué)家們共同關(guān)注。本論文著眼于反壟斷這一法律視角，探討中國(guó)電信業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)機(jī)制構(gòu)建的若干法律問(wèn)題。全文除引言外，共分成五個(gè)部分。 引言中首先對(duì)文中使用的電信和電信業(yè)這兩個(gè)概念作出界定，然后指出中國(guó)電信業(yè)現(xiàn)有市場(chǎng)格局仍處于高度壟斷之中，亟待改進(jìn)。第一部分結(jié)合電信業(yè)的實(shí)際，通過(guò)對(duì)“自然壟斷”學(xué)說(shuō)的分析，，得出電信業(yè)不應(yīng)作為反壟斷法適用的除外領(lǐng)域的結(jié)論。第二部分總結(jié)全球電信改革的法律實(shí)踐，指出破除電信壟斷已經(jīng)成為世界性的潮流，且具有開(kāi)放市場(chǎng)與投資主體多元化相伴而行的鮮明特點(diǎn)。第三部分闡述六種有損于電信業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)機(jī)制的常見(jiàn)壟斷行為，包括對(duì)互聯(lián)互通設(shè)置障礙、接入收費(fèi)壟斷定價(jià)等等。第四部分是對(duì)中國(guó)電信業(yè)現(xiàn)有反壟斷機(jī)制的整體評(píng)價(jià)，認(rèn)為執(zhí)法依據(jù)不明、思想認(rèn)識(shí)上的偏差和權(quán)利保障的不足是其三大缺陷。最后在第五部分中給出對(duì)“入世”后改進(jìn)中國(guó)電信業(yè)反壟斷機(jī)制的一些初步思考，諸如完善立法、重組執(zhí)法機(jī)構(gòu)、重塑指導(dǎo)思想、明確規(guī)制內(nèi)容等。
[Abstract]:The telecommunications industry occupies a basic position in a country's economy, telecommunications reform is related to the telecommunications industry. Beneficial to the people's livelihood competition by monopoly, worthy of common concern of economists and jurists. This paper focuses on the anti monopoly law perspective, some legal issues in the construction industry. The competition mechanism of China Telecom in addition to the introduction, is divided into five parts..
First in the introduction of the two concepts of Telecom and telecom industry used in this paper is defined, and then pointed out that the existing market structure of industry China Telecom is still highly monopolist, need to be improved. The first part according to the reality of the telecommunication industry, through the analysis of natural monopoly theory, the telecom industry should not be used except in the field of application of the conclusion the anti monopoly law. The second part summarizes the legal practice of global telecommunications reform, points out that to get rid of the telecom monopoly has become a trend in the world, and has diversified open market and investment characteristics together. The third part expounds six kinds of damage to the competition mechanism of the telecommunications industry common monopoly behavior, including the obstacles of interoperability access charges and so on. The fourth part is the monopoly pricing of China Telecom of existing anti monopoly mechanism of overall evaluation, that the basis of law enforcement is unknown, thinking and understanding of the In the fifth part, we give some preliminary thoughts on the improvement of China Telecom's anti-monopoly mechanism after joining the WTO, such as improving legislation, reorganizing law enforcement agencies, remodeling guiding ideology and defining regulation contents.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2003
【分類號(hào)】：D922.296

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐士英;唐曉明;;論我國(guó)電信產(chǎn)業(yè)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的法律規(guī)制[J];安徽大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2002年01期

2 王春娣;論反壟斷法立法的價(jià)值取向──兼析微軟訟案[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2001年12期

3 徐孟洲,侯作前;論反壟斷法中的量化問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué)雜志;2002年03期

4 曹博;公用企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)與管制立法問(wèn)題探析[J];法學(xué);2002年06期

5 戚聿東;我國(guó)自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)分拆式改革的誤區(qū)分析及其出路[J];管理世界;2002年02期

6 盧現(xiàn)祥;論政府在我國(guó)基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施領(lǐng)域促進(jìn)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)及反壟斷中的“諾思悖論”[J];管理世界;2002年02期

7 陳小洪;中國(guó)電信業(yè):政策、產(chǎn)業(yè)組織的變化及若干建議[J];管理世界;1999年01期

8 張杰軍;美日反壟斷法執(zhí)法機(jī)構(gòu)及權(quán)限比較研究[J];河北法學(xué);2002年01期

9 劉曉純;對(duì)我國(guó)反壟斷法調(diào)整對(duì)象的立法建議[J];河北法學(xué);2002年02期

10 李聲,沈禾;實(shí)現(xiàn)信息化帶動(dòng)工業(yè)化的對(duì)策研究[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2002年03期

本文編號(hào)：1585794