本文選題：微博　切入點(diǎn)：侵權(quán)　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：今天,你織“圍脖”了嗎? 微博(Micro-blog)是一個(gè)基于用戶關(guān)系的信息分享、傳播以及獲取平臺(tái),用戶可以通過WEB、WAP等各種客戶端組建個(gè)人社區(qū),以140字左右的文字更新信息,并實(shí)現(xiàn)即時(shí)分享。最早也是最著名的微博是美國twitter。2009年8月中國門戶網(wǎng)站新浪推出“新浪微博”內(nèi)測版,成為門戶網(wǎng)站中第一家提供微博服務(wù)的網(wǎng)站,微博正式進(jìn)入中文上網(wǎng)主流人群視野。微博最大的特點(diǎn)就是：發(fā)布信息快速,信息傳播的速度快。中國人民大學(xué)輿論研究所所長喻國明說：“微博可以產(chǎn)生‘核裂變’效應(yīng),形成信息的高速大范圍傳播,它可以讓每個(gè)人都發(fā)揮過去只有媒體才能發(fā)揮的作用。微博是公眾的“麥克風(fēng)”,是輿論監(jiān)督的一顆新星。從身陷“調(diào)情門”的成都青羊區(qū)教育局黨委辦公室主任趙子俊到不小心自曝,把微博當(dāng)QQ,直播開房的江蘇省溧陽市衛(wèi)生局局長謝志強(qiáng),各路貪官污吏因微博曝光紛紛落馬。然而,作為一種新興的信息傳播手段,其消極面還未受到法律法規(guī)的嚴(yán)格管理和調(diào)控。當(dāng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由超出法律界限時(shí),微博便成為了一種侵權(quán)利器。 本文主要針對當(dāng)前日益突出的微博侵權(quán)問題做了一些初步的法律評析,并在此基礎(chǔ)上對微博的法律規(guī)制問題進(jìn)行了相關(guān)思考。除去結(jié)語,文章主要分為五個(gè)部分： 第一部分是關(guān)于微博侵權(quán)出現(xiàn)的背景以及與微博侵權(quán)有關(guān)的一些法理思考。 第二部分是關(guān)于微博侵權(quán)的特點(diǎn)以及如何認(rèn)定某一行為屬于微博侵權(quán)。 第三部分是微博侵權(quán)的常見形式,包括微博侵犯名譽(yù)權(quán)、微博侵犯隱私權(quán)、微博侵犯商業(yè)秘密以及微博侵犯公共利益。 第四部分是在前三部分的基礎(chǔ)上對微博侵權(quán)的歸責(zé)、責(zé)任主體以及責(zé)任承擔(dān)等問題展開的相關(guān)論述。 第五部分主要包括國內(nèi)外關(guān)于微博侵權(quán)法律規(guī)制的現(xiàn)狀以及筆者對如何完善我國相關(guān)法律規(guī)制等問題進(jìn)行的一些思考。
[Abstract]:Did you knit your neck today? Weibo Micro-blog is a platform for information sharing, dissemination and access based on user relations. Users can form individual communities through various clients such as WEB-WAP and update information with about 140 words of text. And realize instant sharing. The earliest and most famous Weibo was the twitter.2009 of the United States, the Chinese portal Sina launched an internal test version of "Sina Weibo" in August of this year, becoming the first website in the portal to provide services to Weibo. Weibo has formally entered the mainstream of the Chinese Internet population. The biggest characteristic of Weibo is that the dissemination of information is fast and the speed of information dissemination is fast. Yu Guoming, director of the Institute of Public opinion Research at Renmin University of China, said: "Weibo can produce the effect of nuclear fission." The formation of high-speed and large-scale dissemination of information, It allows everyone to play the role that only the media used to play. Weibo is the "microphone" of the public and a new star in the supervision of public opinion. From the "flirting door", the director of the party committee office of Chengdu's Qingyang district education bureau. Zhao Zijun accidentally exposed himself, Weibo was taken as QQQ, and Weibo, director of the Liyang Municipal Health Bureau of Jiangsu Province, who opened the room live, was defeated by the exposure of corrupt officials from all walks of life. However, as a new means of information dissemination, Its negative side has not been strictly regulated and regulated by laws and regulations. When the freedom of speech on the Internet exceeded the legal limit, Weibo became a kind of tort weapon. This article mainly makes some preliminary legal comments on the increasingly prominent tort problem of Weibo, and on this basis carries on the related consideration to the question of legal regulation of Weibo. Apart from the conclusion, the article is divided into five parts:. The first part is about the background of Weibo's infringement and some legal thinking about the infringement of Weibo. The second part is about the characteristics of Weibo tort and how to identify a certain act as Weibo tort. The third part is the common forms of Weibo's infringement, including Weibo infringing upon the right of reputation, Weibo infringing on privacy, Weibo infringing on business secrets and Weibo infringing on public interests. The fourth part is on the basis of the first three parts of Weibo tort liability, the main responsibility and responsibility of the relevant issues. The fifth part mainly includes the domestic and foreign about Weibo tort legal regulation present situation as well as the author to how to consummate our country related legal regulation and so on question carries on some thought.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 耿利航;;如何界定公共利益——美國聯(lián)邦最高法院“凱洛訴新倫敦市案”的剖析和啟示[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年02期

2 孫輝筱;;淺析微博對隱私權(quán)的侵犯[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年09期

3 葉捷思;;淺論“自媒體”的法律規(guī)制[J];法治研究;2009年11期

4 向玲莉;阮志兵;;“微博打拐”引發(fā)的對乞討兒童救助的法律思考[J];中國城市經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年23期

5 徐敬宏;;歐盟網(wǎng)絡(luò)隱私權(quán)的法律法規(guī)保護(hù)及其啟示[J];情報(bào)理論與實(shí)踐;2009年05期

6 李紹章;;博客侵權(quán)的免責(zé)空間[J];檢察風(fēng)云;2006年15期

7 周迪;劉林;;淺析網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的法律責(zé)任[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2011年S9期

，

本文編號(hào)：1668031