【摘要】：礦業(yè)權(quán)是進(jìn)行礦產(chǎn)資源開(kāi)發(fā)利用的資格,但我國(guó)目前的礦產(chǎn)資源利用過(guò)程中存在著一些問(wèn)題,法律生態(tài)化是當(dāng)下我國(guó)法律發(fā)展的的趨勢(shì)。進(jìn)行研究礦業(yè)權(quán)生態(tài)化,通過(guò)分析礦業(yè)權(quán)的含義及生態(tài)化的含義,對(duì)礦業(yè)權(quán)生態(tài)化進(jìn)行定義,同時(shí)對(duì)礦業(yè)權(quán)生態(tài)化的價(jià)值和功能進(jìn)行闡述,論證礦業(yè)權(quán)生態(tài)化的必要性和可行性,提出礦業(yè)權(quán)生態(tài)化應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循的基本原則,對(duì)礦業(yè)權(quán)生態(tài)化實(shí)現(xiàn)的主要路徑進(jìn)行闡述。第一部分從礦業(yè)權(quán)和生態(tài)化的概念著筆,提出了礦業(yè)權(quán)生態(tài)化的基本概念,并對(duì)我國(guó)的礦業(yè)權(quán)生態(tài)化的表現(xiàn)進(jìn)行說(shuō)明,指出了礦業(yè)權(quán)生態(tài)化的意義所在;第二部分著重闡述了礦業(yè)權(quán)生態(tài)化的必要性和可行性,從價(jià)值論和問(wèn)題論的角度論證礦業(yè)權(quán)生態(tài)化的必要性,在法律基礎(chǔ)和政策基礎(chǔ)的語(yǔ)境下分析礦業(yè)權(quán)生態(tài)化的可行性;第三部分,通過(guò)環(huán)保權(quán)利、環(huán)保義務(wù)、權(quán)利科學(xué)行使的分析,提出了礦業(yè)權(quán)生態(tài)化應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循的原則;第四部分,由于我國(guó)并未真正實(shí)現(xiàn)礦業(yè)權(quán)生態(tài)化,筆者在健全礦業(yè)權(quán)行政審批制度、生態(tài)補(bǔ)償體制的建立、礦業(yè)權(quán)管理體制的改革三個(gè)方面提出了礦業(yè)權(quán)生態(tài)化的主要路徑。本文是對(duì)礦業(yè)權(quán)在行使過(guò)程中如礦業(yè)權(quán)何實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)環(huán)境的保護(hù),即生態(tài)化進(jìn)行研究,研究的目的是規(guī)范礦業(yè)權(quán)人行使礦業(yè)權(quán),讓礦業(yè)權(quán)人重視礦業(yè)權(quán)行使過(guò)程的環(huán)境保護(hù),同時(shí)提出了一些法律建議以期對(duì)我國(guó)的礦業(yè)權(quán)生態(tài)化進(jìn)程產(chǎn)生影響,實(shí)現(xiàn)礦產(chǎn)資源的合理利用,礦產(chǎn)資源的科學(xué)利用和可持續(xù)發(fā)展,最終實(shí)現(xiàn)礦業(yè)權(quán)生態(tài)化——環(huán)境保護(hù)與礦產(chǎn)資源利用的平衡。
[Abstract]:Mining right is the qualification of mineral resources exploitation and utilization, but there are some problems in the process of mineral resources utilization in our country at present. Through analyzing the meaning of mining right and the meaning of ecologicalization, this paper defines the ecologicalization of mining right, and expounds the value and function of ecologicalization of mining right. This paper demonstrates the necessity and feasibility of ecologicalization of mining rights, puts forward the basic principles which should be followed in ecologicalization of mining rights, and expounds the main ways to realize ecologicalization of mining rights. In the first part, the author puts forward the basic concept of mining right ecology from the concept of mining right and ecology, and explains the performance of mining right ecology in our country, and points out the significance of mining right ecology. The second part focuses on the necessity and feasibility of ecologicalization of mining rights, demonstrates the necessity of ecologicalization of mining rights from the angle of value theory and problem theory, and analyzes the feasibility of ecologicalization of mining rights in the context of legal basis and policy basis. The third part, through the environmental protection right, the environmental protection duty, the right scientific exercise analysis, proposed the mining right ecology should follow the principle; The fourth part, because our country has not really realized the ecologicalization of mining rights, the author puts forward the main path of ecologicalization of mining rights in three aspects: perfecting the administrative examination and approval system of mining rights, establishing the ecological compensation system and reforming the management system of mining rights. In this paper, the author studies how to protect the environment in the process of mining right, that is to say, ecology. The purpose of the study is to standardize the mining right holders' exercise of mining rights, and let mining rights owners attach importance to the environmental protection in the process of mining rights exercise. At the same time, some legal suggestions are put forward in order to influence the ecological process of mining rights in China, to realize the rational utilization of mineral resources, the scientific utilization and sustainable development of mineral resources. Finally, the ecologicalization of mining rights is realized-the balance between environmental protection and mineral resources utilization.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.62

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳瑤;;我國(guó)生態(tài)修復(fù)的現(xiàn)狀及國(guó)外生態(tài)修復(fù)的啟示[J];生態(tài)經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年10期

2 冷傳莉;李怡;;我國(guó)海域使用權(quán)制度生態(tài)化初論[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期

3 方印;徐鵬飛;;大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代的中國(guó)環(huán)境法治問(wèn)題研究[J];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年01期

4 張勇;;采礦技術(shù)在煤礦應(yīng)用過(guò)程中的問(wèn)題[J];科技資訊;2015年20期

5 胡衛(wèi);;論礦害責(zé)任承擔(dān)規(guī)則與責(zé)任方式[J];政法論叢;2015年02期

6 方印;;論實(shí)踐理性的環(huán)境法哲學(xué)觀——基于當(dāng)代環(huán)境法哲學(xué)中三個(gè)重要命題的思考[J];溫州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年01期

7 王小華;崔熙琳;;“三資”視角下的礦業(yè)權(quán)市場(chǎng)建設(shè):我國(guó)礦業(yè)權(quán)市場(chǎng)建設(shè)十六年回顧[J];中國(guó)礦業(yè);2015年01期

8 劉歡歡;;生態(tài)化背景下的自然資源使用權(quán)制度研究[J];新西部(理論版);2014年21期

9 郁建興;沈永東;周俊;;從雙重管理到合規(guī)性監(jiān)管——全面深化改革時(shí)代行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)商會(huì)監(jiān)管體制的重構(gòu)[J];浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年04期

10 樊國(guó)富;;采礦企業(yè)在露天采礦過(guò)程中的環(huán)境問(wèn)題分析[J];企業(yè)導(dǎo)報(bào);2014年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 方印;徐鵬飛;;發(fā)揮大數(shù)據(jù)作用 研究環(huán)境法學(xué)[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2014年

2 楊朝霞;;出臺(tái)環(huán)境基本法推動(dòng)法律生態(tài)化[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

3 王新偉 ;吳秉澤 ;新偉 ;冷傳莉;;完善促進(jìn)生態(tài)文明的法規(guī)體系[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 黃萍;自然資源使用權(quán)制度研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年

2 王淑華;城鄉(xiāng)建設(shè)用地流轉(zhuǎn)法律制度研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

3 孫莉;采礦權(quán)性質(zhì)及制度完善研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 胡雙艷;從審批制到備案制的行政監(jiān)管研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

2 李昂;我國(guó)礦業(yè)管制的法律問(wèn)題研究[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2013年

3 葛慶敏;論可持續(xù)發(fā)展理念下自然資源物權(quán)制度的完善[D];重慶大學(xué);2009年

4 陳曉冉;我國(guó)環(huán)境行政公益訴訟的制度構(gòu)建[D];山西大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2371675