本文選題：環(huán)境保護(hù) + 行政處罰��； 參考：《蘇州大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 環(huán)境保護(hù)領(lǐng)域的依法行政事關(guān)群眾環(huán)境權(quán)益和社會(huì)和諧穩(wěn)定。人們對(duì)環(huán)境行政處罰裁量基準(zhǔn)克服裁量隨意性的功能期待,使裁量基準(zhǔn)作為環(huán)保部門(mén)依法行政的自我改良之舉迅速興起。本文就環(huán)境行政處罰裁量基準(zhǔn)設(shè)定的必要性與強(qiáng)制性、控制技術(shù)及監(jiān)督制約進(jìn)行了深入的分析。提出環(huán)境行政處罰裁量基準(zhǔn)原則、相關(guān)因素的確定應(yīng)作為國(guó)家、省和有立法權(quán)的市的環(huán)保部門(mén)的強(qiáng)制義務(wù),裁量基準(zhǔn)的制定應(yīng)作為各級(jí)有執(zhí)法權(quán)的環(huán)保部門(mén)的強(qiáng)制義務(wù)。通過(guò)簡(jiǎn)單的裁量基準(zhǔn)分格技術(shù)與處罰公式和分格相結(jié)合的裁量基準(zhǔn)分格技術(shù)的對(duì)比,分清了不同分格技術(shù)的優(yōu)劣,提出了完善措施。對(duì)環(huán)境行政處罰裁量基準(zhǔn)的司法監(jiān)督、行政內(nèi)部監(jiān)督、公眾監(jiān)督進(jìn)行了分析,提出了完善的建議。
[Abstract]:Administration by law in the field of environmental protection concerns the environmental rights and interests of the masses and social harmony and stability. People expect the environmental administrative penalty discretion to overcome the function expectation of discretion randomness, which makes the discretion standard as the self-improvement of environmental protection department to administrate according to law. This paper makes a deep analysis on the necessity and compulsion of the setting of environmental administrative penalty discretion benchmark, the control technology and the supervision and restriction. The principle of environmental administrative penalty discretion benchmark is put forward. The determination of relevant factors should be regarded as the compulsory obligation of the environmental protection department of the country, province and city with legislative power, and the formulation of the discretion standard should be regarded as the compulsory obligation of the environmental protection department with law enforcement power at all levels. Based on the comparison of the simple technique of standard division of discretion with punishment formula and the technique of standard division of discretion, the advantages and disadvantages of different dividing techniques are distinguished, and the improvement measures are put forward. This paper analyzes the judicial supervision, internal administrative supervision and public supervision of the environmental administrative penalty discretion benchmark, and puts forward some perfect suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D912.1;D912.6

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李東義;朝陽(yáng)市商務(wù)行政執(zhí)法問(wèn)題研究[D];大連理工大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1951115