本文選題：環(huán)境行政主體 + 環(huán)境行政責任　； 參考：《蘭州大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：環(huán)境法律責任包括環(huán)境刑事責任、環(huán)境民事責任以及環(huán)境行政責任這三種責任類型。其中,環(huán)境行政責任又可以分為環(huán)境行政主體的行政責任、環(huán)境行政相對人的行政責任和國家公務員的行政責任。本文之所以特別強調(diào)環(huán)境行政主體行政法律責任,原因在于,在現(xiàn)今頻發(fā)的環(huán)境事件當中,有相當數(shù)量的事件是因為環(huán)境行政主體未履行或未及時履行所致。實踐中,環(huán)境行政不作為、環(huán)境行政不有效作為、環(huán)境行政濫作為現(xiàn)象比比皆是,即設的環(huán)境法律法規(guī)得不到有效實現(xiàn),環(huán)境行政主體行政法律責任的實現(xiàn)幾乎虛置。怎樣扭轉這一不利現(xiàn)象?怎樣使環(huán)境行政主體行政法律責任能夠得到有效的實現(xiàn)?本文主要圍繞這些問題展開。通過介紹研究背景,找出本文探討問題的出發(fā)點。然后從五個方面對此問題做詳細的研究。首先,介紹了環(huán)境行政主體行政法律責任的基本理論知識,借以理清各個概念之間的邏輯關系,以便于后文的順利進行。在第二章,主要歸納了環(huán)境行政責任主體行政法律責任實現(xiàn)的現(xiàn)行途徑,重點介紹了環(huán)境行政處罰。接著,在第三章里,針對現(xiàn)行的途徑,分析環(huán)境行政主體行政責任實現(xiàn)不能的表現(xiàn)與原因。其中,既有體制層面的,也有立法層面的。第四章,針對環(huán)境行政主體行政法律責任實現(xiàn)不能的狀況提出科學合理的對策建議。主要從培養(yǎng)責任行政意識、道德輔助、進行政府績效改革、體制改革等角度展開論述,以期能夠有效遏制或者消除不利于環(huán)境行政主體行政法律責任實現(xiàn)的因素,為其有效實現(xiàn)提供一定的理論和實踐支持。最后是結論部分。為了更好地進行闡述,本文采用了比較研究、歷史考察和邏輯推理的、語義注釋等方法。
[Abstract]:Environmental legal liability includes environmental criminal liability, environmental civil liability and environmental administrative liability. Among them, the environmental administrative responsibility can be divided into the administrative responsibility of the environmental administrative subject, the administrative responsibility of the environmental administrative counterpart and the administrative responsibility of the state civil servant. The reason why this paper emphasizes the administrative legal responsibility of environmental administrative subject is that, among the frequent environmental events nowadays, a considerable number of events are caused by the failure or failure of the environmental administrative subject to perform in time. In practice, environmental administrative omission, environmental administrative ineffectiveness, environmental administrative abuse phenomenon abound, that is, the environmental laws and regulations can not be effectively realized, the realization of the environmental administrative subject's administrative legal responsibility is almost empty. How to reverse this adverse phenomenon? How to make the environmental administrative subject administrative legal responsibility can be effectively realized? This paper focuses on these problems. By introducing the research background, we find out the starting point of this paper. Then from five aspects to do a detailed study of this problem. First of all, it introduces the basic theoretical knowledge of the administrative legal responsibility of the environmental administrative subject, in order to clarify the logical relationship between the various concepts, so as to facilitate the smooth progress of the following articles. In the second chapter, the author summarizes the current ways of realizing the administrative legal responsibility of the subject of environmental administrative responsibility, and focuses on the introduction of environmental administrative punishment. Then, in the third chapter, in view of the current way, analyzes the performance and the reason of the administrative responsibility of the environmental administrative subject can not be realized. Among them, there are both institutional level and legislative level. In the fourth chapter, the author puts forward scientific and reasonable countermeasures against the situation that the administrative legal responsibility of the environmental administrative subject cannot be realized. Mainly from the angle of cultivating responsibility administrative consciousness, moral assistance, government performance reform, system reform and so on, in order to effectively contain or eliminate the factors that are not conducive to the realization of environmental administrative subject administrative legal responsibility. To provide some theoretical and practical support for its effective implementation. The last part is the conclusion. In order to better explain, this paper adopts the methods of comparative study, historical investigation and logical reasoning, semantic annotation and so on.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.6;D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王曉莉,陳勇;論行政責任實現(xiàn)機制(上)——行政責任的評價[J];北京市政法管理干部學院學報;2003年03期

2 張梓太;中國環(huán)境行政訴訟之困境與對策分析[J];法學評論;2003年05期

3 李摯萍;略論政府在環(huán)境保護中的主導地位[J];法學評論;1999年03期

4 林麗;;關于環(huán)境行政公益訴訟的法律思考[J];河北法學;2007年08期

5 張建偉;;完善政府環(huán)境責任的若干思考[J];河北法學;2008年03期

6 劉國軍;環(huán)境行政處罰中存在的問題與對策[J];環(huán)境保護;1999年04期

7 樸光洙;淺談環(huán)境行政賠償制度[J];環(huán)境保護;1995年05期

8 董峰,陳忠琪,郭霞普;淺析破產(chǎn)重組企業(yè)環(huán)境行政責任[J];環(huán)境導報;1997年05期

9 王明遠;環(huán)境行政程序法論[J];環(huán)境導報;1999年02期

10 李景群;中國環(huán)境管理行政機構設置分析[J];中國環(huán)境管理干部學院學報;2000年02期

相關碩士學位論文 前7條

1 宋楊;我國環(huán)境行政主體研究[D];東北林業(yè)大學;2006年

2 段海明;環(huán)境行政不作為的法律探討[D];東北林業(yè)大學;2006年

3 徐偉學;行政追償制度研究[D];中國政法大學;2007年

4 吳凱凱;環(huán)境執(zhí)法人員行政責任內(nèi)部追究機制研究[D];中國政法大學;2007年

5 萬里;環(huán)境法律責任研究[D];昆明理工大學;2008年

6 王小萍;論環(huán)境行政主體的外部行政責任[D];中國政法大學;2009年

7 宋曉玲;行政法律責任有效實現(xiàn)問題研究[D];蘭州大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1892032