本文選題：西澳礦業(yè)法 + 礦業(yè)督察員�。� 參考：《理論月刊》2011年11期

【摘要】：西澳《礦業(yè)法1978》奠定了礦業(yè)督察員與督察員法院制度的法律基礎(chǔ),《礦業(yè)修正法2004》第9章專門區(qū)別了督察員行政管理與督察員法院裁判的角色作用。2007年3月9號(hào)修正的《礦業(yè)條例1981》進(jìn)一步明確和細(xì)化了督察員的行政權(quán)力與運(yùn)行程序,突出了礦業(yè)督察員解決礦權(quán)爭(zhēng)端的行政程序規(guī)則。實(shí)體正義、程序公平、利益激勵(lì)及司法審查是督察員解決礦權(quán)爭(zhēng)端的主要特點(diǎn)。簡(jiǎn)單分析西澳礦業(yè)督察員制度,旨在為我國(guó)解決礦權(quán)爭(zhēng)端的行政機(jī)制提供參考與借鑒。
[Abstract]:The Mining Law 1978 in Western Australia laid the legal foundation for the court system of mining inspectors and inspectors. Chapter 9 of the Mining Amendment Act 2004 specifically distinguishes the role of inspectors from the role of inspectors' administration and inspector's court decisions. Revision of March 9, 2007 The mining regulations 1981 have further clarified and refined the administrative powers and operating procedures of inspectors. It highlights the rules of administrative procedure for mining inspectors to settle disputes over mining rights. Substantive justice, procedural fairness, interest incentives and judicial review are the main characteristics of inspectors in resolving mining rights disputes. A brief analysis of the mining inspector system in Western Australia aims at providing a reference for the administrative mechanism of resolving mineral rights disputes in China.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)政法學(xué)院;
【基金】：中央高校基本科研業(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)資金資助項(xiàng)目(CUGW100223) 國(guó)土資源法律評(píng)價(jià)工程實(shí)驗(yàn)室開(kāi)放基金項(xiàng)目(2010Y008) 中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)(武漢)政法學(xué)院重點(diǎn)科研項(xiàng)目培育基金(ZF201103)
【分類號(hào)】：D961.1;DD912.6;F416.1
，

本文編號(hào)：1863121