本文選題：海洋資源侵權(quán) + 海洋資源物權(quán)��； 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：海洋對(duì)于地球和生命具有至關(guān)重要的意義,它是人類賴以生存發(fā)展的資源寶庫,合理開發(fā)和利用海洋資源將是人類解決資源短缺、人口激增等難題的重要出路。本文牢牢抓住“物權(quán)”和“侵權(quán)”兩條主線,透過海洋資源物權(quán)制度的視角,對(duì)實(shí)踐中各種侵犯海洋資源物權(quán)的行為進(jìn)行類型化分析,從而為海洋資源侵權(quán)行為的有效規(guī)范尋求一種制度上的保障。 本文分為五大部分對(duì)海洋資源侵權(quán)制度進(jìn)行論述。 第一部分為海洋資源概述。文章從概念和特征入手,揭示出海洋資源的多樣性、多重利用性、敏感性等內(nèi)涵,并以“中海油”事件為視角,對(duì)我國現(xiàn)有的海洋資源法律保護(hù)體系進(jìn)行分析,并透視出我國海洋資源法律制度的不足。 第二部分是對(duì)海洋資源物權(quán)制度的述評(píng)。通過對(duì)海洋資源所有權(quán)、海洋資源用益物權(quán)和海洋資源擔(dān)保物權(quán)的分類闡述,探討了海洋資源物權(quán)的取得、變更及消滅。對(duì)海洋資源物權(quán)的定位是研究海洋資源侵權(quán)制度的基礎(chǔ)。 第三部分進(jìn)入海洋資源侵權(quán)制度的探討。文章首先對(duì)海洋資源侵權(quán)制度的必要性和價(jià)值取向進(jìn)行了論述,提出該制度的建立應(yīng)當(dāng)兼顧經(jīng)濟(jì)效益和生態(tài)效益、救濟(jì)和預(yù)防并重。其次便是對(duì)海洋資源侵權(quán)理論制度的具體闡述,包括對(duì)海洋資源侵權(quán)法律關(guān)系的闡釋、對(duì)海洋資源侵權(quán)行為的特征和歸責(zé)原則的論述以及對(duì)海洋資源侵權(quán)責(zé)任的構(gòu)成要件、免責(zé)事由和責(zé)任形式的分類探討,從理論上搭建起海洋資源侵權(quán)制度的框架。 第四部分為海洋資源侵權(quán)類型的探討。文章緊緊圍繞海洋資源所有權(quán)、用益物權(quán)和擔(dān)保物權(quán)的內(nèi)容,對(duì)侵犯海洋資源所有權(quán)、用益物權(quán)、擔(dān)保物權(quán)的侵權(quán)行為進(jìn)行分析歸類。 第五部分為海洋資源侵權(quán)制度的糾紛解決機(jī)制。文章首先對(duì)傳統(tǒng)的自力救濟(jì)、社會(huì)救濟(jì)和公力救濟(jì)三種糾紛解決途徑進(jìn)行論述,其次針對(duì)海洋資源侵權(quán)損害大、恢復(fù)難的現(xiàn)狀提出了一些建議。通過對(duì)責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)、環(huán)境補(bǔ)償基金的闡述表明它們對(duì)海洋資源侵權(quán)的有效救濟(jì)具有現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。
[Abstract]:The ocean is of vital significance to the earth and life. It is the treasure house of human resources for survival and development. The rational exploitation and utilization of marine resources will be an important way out for mankind to solve the problems such as shortage of resources and population explosion. This paper firmly grasps the two main lines of "real right" and "tort", and through the perspective of the system of real right of marine resources, makes a typological analysis of various violations of real right of marine resources in practice. In order to seek a kind of institutional guarantee for the effective norm of the tort of marine resources. This paper is divided into five parts to discuss the tort system of marine resources. The first part is an overview of marine resources. Starting with the concept and characteristics, this paper reveals the connotation of the diversity, multi-utilization and sensitivity of marine resources, and analyzes the existing legal protection system of marine resources in China from the perspective of "Cnooc" incident. And perspective out the lack of legal system of marine resources in China. The second part is a review of the real right system of marine resources. Through the classification and elaboration of the ownership of marine resources, the usufruct of marine resources and the real rights of security of marine resources, this paper discusses the acquisition, change and elimination of the real rights of marine resources. The positioning of the real right of marine resources is the basis of studying the tort system of marine resources. The third part discusses the tort system of marine resources. This paper first discusses the necessity and value orientation of the marine resources tort system, and puts forward that the establishment of the system should pay attention to both economic and ecological benefits, as well as relief and prevention. Secondly, it elaborates the theoretical system of marine resource tort, including the interpretation of the legal relationship of marine resource tort, the characteristics of marine resource tort and the principle of liability, as well as the constitutive elements of marine resource tort liability. This paper discusses the classification of exemption and liability form, and sets up the framework of marine resources tort system theoretically. The fourth part is the discussion of the types of marine resources infringement. Based on the contents of the ownership of marine resources, usufruct and security, this paper analyzes and classifies the infringement of the ownership, usufruct and security of marine resources. The fifth part is the dispute settlement mechanism of marine resources tort system. At first, the paper discusses the traditional methods of self-relief, social relief and public relief, and then puts forward some suggestions on the current situation that the marine resources are damaged by tort and difficult to recover. Through the elaboration of liability insurance and environmental compensation fund, it shows that their effective relief to the infringement of marine resources is of practical significance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923;D922.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 晉海;不可抗力為環(huán)境侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任免責(zé)條件的質(zhì)疑[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2001年07期

2 高圣平;嚴(yán)之;;海域使用權(quán)抵押權(quán)的體系定位與制度完善[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2009年04期

3 楊華;王全弟;;圍海造地過程中的權(quán)利承接及其法律規(guī)制[J];法學(xué);2010年07期

4 王明遠(yuǎn);相鄰關(guān)系制度的調(diào)整與環(huán)境侵權(quán)的救濟(jì)[J];法學(xué)研究;1999年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 傅聰;海洋資源開發(fā)利用法律制度研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2003年

2 蔣平;我國海洋資源綜合開發(fā)利用法律問題研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1861157