本文選題：訴訟　切入點(diǎn)：環(huán)境侵權(quán)　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文

【摘要】： 現(xiàn)代法治社會(huì)條件下調(diào)動(dòng)廣大公眾等私權(quán)主體參與維護(hù)公共環(huán)境權(quán)是鞏固環(huán)境保護(hù)成果、促進(jìn)公眾環(huán)境權(quán)益的根本途徑。在此基礎(chǔ)上探索可行的環(huán)境民事公益訴訟體制是解決我國(guó)日趨嚴(yán)重的環(huán)境污染問題的重要思路之一。本文試圖從經(jīng)濟(jì)法、環(huán)境法、訴訟法的視角并輔以法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)角度來分析問題,運(yùn)用系統(tǒng)的、歷史的、比較的方法對(duì)相關(guān)論題進(jìn)行論證。 首先,文章分析了我國(guó)環(huán)境民事公益訴訟的理論基礎(chǔ),從環(huán)境問題、公共環(huán)境問題以及環(huán)境與人的交互關(guān)系、環(huán)境公益權(quán)的性質(zhì)方面來論述公眾與環(huán)境的不可分割性,強(qiáng)調(diào)公眾環(huán)境權(quán)與環(huán)境維護(hù)的有機(jī)統(tǒng)一、環(huán)境公益權(quán)主體和訴權(quán)主體是一脈相承的邏輯體。 其次,本文以環(huán)境、公共環(huán)境保護(hù)、環(huán)境保護(hù)制度體系為切入點(diǎn),指出我國(guó)目前趨于傳統(tǒng)的單軌制環(huán)保模式不能很好地適應(yīng)當(dāng)代社會(huì)利益多元化、角色社會(huì)化、權(quán)義一體化背景下環(huán)境保護(hù)的要求,剖析了我國(guó)目前環(huán)境保護(hù)的無力狀況及其深層原因,表明探索多樣化的環(huán)保模式具有現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 再次,本文從環(huán)境民事公益訴訟的基本性質(zhì)入手,主張“任何人”(檢察機(jī)關(guān)、非國(guó)家機(jī)關(guān)法人、其他組織、公民),為保護(hù)環(huán)境公益,當(dāng)其認(rèn)為公共環(huán)境權(quán)益受到各個(gè)私權(quán)主體直接與間接的損害或有損害之虞時(shí),以自己的名義代表國(guó)家或社會(huì)公眾以環(huán)境侵害、破壞行為主體為被告向法院提起訴訟,請(qǐng)求判令停止正在或可能發(fā)生的環(huán)境損害行為,請(qǐng)求恢復(fù)原狀或賠償已經(jīng)造成的環(huán)境損害。根據(jù)起訴主體的身份,本文將環(huán)境民事公益訴訟分為普通環(huán)境民事公益訴訟和特殊環(huán)境民事公益訴訟(環(huán)境民事公訴)兩大類。文章分析了環(huán)境民事公益訴訟在“起訴主體,受益主體,救濟(jì)內(nèi)容,訴訟目的”方面與傳統(tǒng)環(huán)境民事私益訴訟模式之間的差異。在剖析為環(huán)境公益而訴訟的嘗試性案例的基礎(chǔ)上,指出建立真正的環(huán)境公益訴訟還存在著法律制度層面的障礙,并就建立相對(duì)獨(dú)立的環(huán)境民事公益訴訟制度的必要性、可行性進(jìn)行了論證。 最后,在進(jìn)行相關(guān)法理鋪墊和實(shí)踐案例剖析的基礎(chǔ)上,本文從我國(guó)環(huán)境民事公益訴訟的立法形式、訴訟原告資格研究(其中,重點(diǎn)對(duì)人民檢察院作為公益訴訟原告進(jìn)行了論述)、訴訟時(shí)效、濫訴防止、訴訟費(fèi)用、法院管轄、調(diào)解制度、合議制和人民陪審員制度、責(zé)任承擔(dān)等方面展開論述,希望對(duì)構(gòu)建適合我國(guó)國(guó)情的環(huán)境民事公益訴訟制度有所裨益。
[Abstract]:Under the condition of modern society ruled by law, it is to consolidate the achievements of environmental protection to mobilize the public and other private right subjects to participate in the maintenance of public environmental rights. On the basis of this, it is one of the important ways to solve the problem of environmental pollution in China to explore a feasible system of environmental civil public interest litigation. This paper attempts to solve the problem of environmental pollution from the economic law, environmental law, environmental law, environmental law, environmental law, environmental law, environmental law, environmental law and environmental law. The angle of view of procedural law and the angle of law and economics are used to analyze the problems, and to demonstrate the relevant issues by systematic, historical and comparative methods. First of all, the paper analyzes the theoretical basis of environmental civil public interest litigation in China, and discusses the indivisibility of public and environment from the aspects of environmental problems, public environmental problems, the interaction between environment and human beings, and the nature of environmental public welfare right. It emphasizes the organic unity of public environmental right and environmental maintenance, and the subject of environmental public right and litigation right is a logical body. Secondly, with the environment, public environmental protection and environmental protection system as the breakthrough point, this paper points out that the traditional monorail environmental protection mode in our country can not adapt to the diversification of social interests and the socialization of roles. The requirements of environmental protection under the background of integration of rights and meanings are analyzed, and the weakness of environmental protection in China and its deep reasons are analyzed, which indicates that it is of practical significance to explore diversified environmental protection models. Thirdly, this article starts with the basic nature of the environmental civil public interest litigation, and advocates that "anyone" (procuratorial organ, non-state legal person, other organizations, citizens), in order to protect the environmental public welfare, When they think that the public environmental rights and interests are directly and indirectly damaged by each private right subject or are in danger of being harmed, they take the environmental infringement on behalf of the state or the public in their own name and bring a lawsuit to the court on behalf of the state or the public as the defendant. Requesting an order to cease an act of environmental damage that is or is likely to occur, requesting restitution or compensation for the environmental damage already caused... in accordance with the status of the subject of the prosecution, This paper divides the environmental civil public interest litigation into two categories: ordinary environmental civil public interest litigation and special environmental civil public interest litigation (environmental civil public interest litigation). The difference between the purpose of litigation and the traditional mode of environmental civil private interest litigation. On the basis of analyzing the trial cases of litigation for the environmental public good, the author points out that there are still obstacles in the legal system for the establishment of the real environmental public interest litigation. The necessity and feasibility of establishing a relatively independent environmental civil public interest litigation system are also discussed. Finally, based on the analysis of relevant jurisprudence and practical cases, this paper studies the legislative form of environmental civil public interest litigation in China, the plaintiff's qualification of litigation (among them, Focusing on the people's Procuratorate as the plaintiff of public interest litigation, such as: limitation of action, prevention of excessive action, litigation expenses, court jurisdiction, mediation system, collegial system, people's jury system, responsibility, etc. It is hoped that it will benefit the construction of environmental civil public interest litigation system suitable for China's national conditions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1;D922.68

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 楊歡;我國(guó)水污染侵權(quán)民事救濟(jì)制度研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2010年

2 陳琳;論環(huán)境權(quán)的可訴性[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2011年

3 劉曉麗;環(huán)境民事公益訴訟原告資格研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2012年

4 韓冬梅;環(huán)境民事公益訴訟原告資格研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1661339