發(fā)布時間：2018-03-18 00:34

  本文選題：霧霾　切入點(diǎn)：污染　出處：《法學(xué)雜志》2017年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：因為霧霾頻發(fā),最近幾年發(fā)生了針對企業(yè)和地方政府的環(huán)境損害侵權(quán)訴訟�；邳c(diǎn)源污染損害的救濟(jì)規(guī)則能否適用于區(qū)域大氣污染損害救濟(jì),目前存在法理上的爭議�！肚謾�(quán)責(zé)任法》對于區(qū)域性大氣污染損害的救濟(jì)沒有作出規(guī)范上的回應(yīng),建議設(shè)立對區(qū)域大氣污染受害者的行政補(bǔ)償機(jī)制。由于起訴特定的違法企業(yè)要求其承擔(dān)區(qū)域侵權(quán)賠償責(zé)任有難度,建議修改立法,擴(kuò)大環(huán)境侵權(quán)責(zé)任適用范圍,讓區(qū)域大氣治理變成各方面的義務(wù),并把環(huán)境成本內(nèi)化于各行各領(lǐng)域。區(qū)域大氣污染損害應(yīng)屬于特殊的共同侵權(quán),但是《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》對此并未認(rèn)可,建議用政府補(bǔ)償?shù)姆绞接枰越鉀Q。區(qū)域之間大氣污染侵權(quán)責(zé)任的追究,應(yīng)遵循共同但有區(qū)別責(zé)任原則,拓展適用基于點(diǎn)源的無過錯責(zé)任原則和因果關(guān)系間接反證原則。大氣污染民事公益訴訟的責(zé)任形式建議僅限于停止侵權(quán)等行為責(zé)任,讓公益訴訟回歸本意。
[Abstract]:Due to the frequent occurrence of haze, in recent years, there have been environmental damage infringement lawsuits against enterprises and local governments. Can the relief rules based on point source pollution damage be applied to regional air pollution damage relief? At present, there is a legal dispute. The Tort liability Law has not made a normative response to the relief of regional air pollution damage. It is suggested that the administrative compensation mechanism should be established for the victims of regional air pollution. Because it is difficult to prosecute specific illegal enterprises to assume the regional tort liability, it is suggested that the legislation should be amended to expand the scope of application of environmental tort liability. Making regional atmospheric governance an obligation for all parties and internalizing environmental costs in all fields. Regional air pollution damage should be a special joint tort, but the Tort liability Law does not recognize this. It is suggested that government compensation should be used to solve the problem. The principle of common but differentiated responsibilities should be followed in investigating the liability for air pollution infringement between regions. The principle of no-fault liability based on point source and the principle of indirect proof of causation are extended. The form of liability of air pollution civil public interest litigation is limited to stop tort and so on, so that the public interest litigation can return to its original intention.
【作者單位】： 國務(wù)院發(fā)展研究中心資源與環(huán)境政策研究所;
【分類號】：D922.68;D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 高飛;;論環(huán)境污染責(zé)任的適用范圍[J];法商研究;2010年06期

2 鄒雄;藍(lán)華生;;環(huán)境污染責(zé)任適用范圍辨析——《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第八章解讀之一[J];海峽法學(xué);2011年01期

3 呂忠梅;張寶;;環(huán)境問題的侵權(quán)法應(yīng)對及其限度——以《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第65條為視角[J];中南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2011年02期

4 謝秋凌;;環(huán)境責(zé)任保險與環(huán)境侵權(quán)責(zé)任法的關(guān)系辨析[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(法學(xué)版);2010年06期

5 高圣平;楊旋;;環(huán)境污染責(zé)任的構(gòu)成要件研究——基于《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第八章的分析[J];創(chuàng)新;2011年06期

6 劉璐;繆宇;;環(huán)境污染責(zé)任的構(gòu)成與舉證責(zé)任的分配——《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第8章“環(huán)境污染責(zé)任”的理解與適用[J];政治與法律;2010年05期

7 王世進(jìn);曾祥生;;侵權(quán)責(zé)任法與環(huán)境法的對話:環(huán)境侵權(quán)責(zé)任最新發(fā)展——兼評《中華人民共和國侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第八章[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年03期

8 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 李鍇;唐，

本文編號：1627225