本文關(guān)鍵詞： WTO規(guī)則 國家經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)原則 經(jīng)濟(jì)安全 沖突與協(xié)調(diào)　出處：《鄭州大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：2011年7月15日,世界貿(mào)易組織(World Trade Organization,以下簡稱WTO)專家組公布了美國、歐盟、墨西哥訴中國相關(guān)自然資源出口限制案的專家組報(bào)告,裁定中國相關(guān)措施違反了WTO規(guī)則及入世承諾,該報(bào)告已經(jīng)公布就引起各界熱烈討論。透過現(xiàn)象看本質(zhì),該爭端的實(shí)質(zhì)涉及到WTO規(guī)則與國家經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)原則間的博弈。加入WTO后,國家如何在這種兩難處境中既遵守WTO規(guī)則又能基于本國利益和可持續(xù)發(fā)展的需要行使經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán),怎樣享受著“戴著鐐銬跳舞”的自由,是我們不得不關(guān)注的問題。本文以WTO規(guī)則與國家經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)原則為研究對(duì)象,通過對(duì)二者沖突和協(xié)調(diào)方面的探析,結(jié)合中國關(guān)于入世與經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)安全的理論實(shí)踐,提出我國充分利用WTO規(guī)則來維護(hù)經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)安全的設(shè)想。 本文包括三部分,共七章內(nèi)容。第一章是導(dǎo)論部分,著重引出文章的主要問題,并對(duì)目前國內(nèi)外學(xué)者的研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行梳理和簡要評(píng)述,同時(shí)講述本文研究方法及創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)。 主體部分為二至六章。第二章主要論述了國家經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)原則的基本理論相關(guān)問題,包括該原則的起源和基本內(nèi)容及其在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化背景下發(fā)展趨勢(shì)。 第三章從國家經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)角度對(duì)WTO規(guī)則進(jìn)行分析。將經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)和經(jīng)濟(jì)安全聯(lián)系起來分析WTO規(guī)則,這是研究WTO規(guī)則與國家經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)原則的一個(gè)十分有效的途徑；另外,基于資源環(huán)境、產(chǎn)業(yè)安全與自然資源主權(quán)和經(jīng)貿(mào)事務(wù)監(jiān)督管理權(quán)的直接聯(lián)系,筆者針對(duì)WTO規(guī)則與資源環(huán)境安全、產(chǎn)業(yè)安全這兩個(gè)問題進(jìn)行分析。 第四章闡述WTO規(guī)則與國家經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)原則的沖突。從整體上對(duì)二者沖突進(jìn)行梳理；通過“中美原材料案”來說明貿(mào)易爭端背后的資源利益爭奪,以體現(xiàn)WTO的自由貿(mào)易規(guī)則與國家經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)尤其是自然資源主權(quán)間的沖突。 第五章是從規(guī)范沖突到制度協(xié)調(diào)的整合。雖然WTO規(guī)則對(duì)國家經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)形成了事實(shí)上的限制,但WTO內(nèi)在地包含了對(duì)與國家經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)沖突的協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制。從WTO的“可持續(xù)發(fā)展”宗旨、例外條款的設(shè)計(jì)、WTO規(guī)則實(shí)施過程中的條款解釋三方面能夠充分體現(xiàn)WTO規(guī)則與國家經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)原則的協(xié)調(diào)性和同質(zhì)性。 第六章是本文落腳點(diǎn),對(duì)我國在WTO框架下維護(hù)經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)的理論和實(shí)踐進(jìn)行梳理,簡要分析我國在參與貿(mào)易談判和訴訟爭端中所表現(xiàn)的不足,提出如何在WTO框架下維護(hù)經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)安全的建議。 第七章為本文的結(jié)論部分。在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化趨勢(shì)下,WTO作為多邊自由貿(mào)易的重要平臺(tái),任何國家的發(fā)展都不能與其脫離。我們要認(rèn)識(shí)WTO對(duì)國家經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)安全及經(jīng)濟(jì)安全的影響,更要理解WTO體制與國家經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)原則間的協(xié)調(diào)性,充分利用WTO規(guī)則來維護(hù)經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)安全。
[Abstract]:On July 15th 2011, the World Trade Organization (WTO) panel of experts published the report of the Panel of experts in the case of the United States, the European Union and Mexico v. China in relation to natural resource export restrictions, ruling that China's relevant measures violated the rules of the WTO and its commitments to WTO accession. The publication of the report has aroused heated discussion from all walks of life. The essence of the dispute involves a game between the WTO rules and the principle of national economic sovereignty. After joining the WTO, How can a country, in this dilemma, abide by the WTO rules, exercise its economic sovereignty on the basis of its own interests and the needs of sustainable development, and enjoy the freedom to "dance in chains"? This paper takes the rules of WTO and the principle of national economic sovereignty as the research object, through the analysis of the conflict and coordination between the two, combined with the theory and practice of China's entry into WTO and economic sovereignty security, This paper puts forward the assumption that our country should make full use of WTO rules to safeguard economic sovereignty and security. This paper consists of three parts, seven chapters. The first chapter is the introduction, focusing on leading to the main problems of the article, and domestic and foreign scholars to sort out and briefly review the current research situation, and also to describe the research methods and innovative points of this paper. The second chapter mainly discusses the basic theoretical issues of the principle of national economic sovereignty, including its origin, basic content and development trend under the background of economic globalization. The third chapter analyzes the WTO rules from the angle of national economic sovereignty. It is a very effective way to study the WTO rules and the principle of national economic sovereignty by connecting economic sovereignty with economic security. Based on the direct relationship between resource environment, industrial security and the sovereignty of natural resources and the right of supervision and management of economic and trade affairs, the author analyzes the two problems of WTO rules, resource and environment security and industrial security. Chapter 4th expounds the conflict between the WTO rules and the principle of national economic sovereignty. In order to reflect the conflict between the free trade rules of WTO and national economic sovereignty, especially the sovereignty of natural resources. Chapter 5th is an integration from conflict of norms to institutional coordination. Although the WTO rules impose de facto restrictions on national economic sovereignty, But the WTO contains an inherent coordination mechanism for conflicts with national economic sovereignty. The design of the exception clause can fully reflect the harmony and homogeneity between the WTO rules and the principle of national economic sovereignty. Chapter 6th is the foothold of this paper, combing the theory and practice of China's economic sovereignty under the framework of WTO, and briefly analyzing the shortcomings of China's participation in trade negotiations and litigation disputes. This paper puts forward some suggestions on how to maintain economic sovereignty and security under the framework of WTO. Chapter 7th is the conclusion of this paper. Under the trend of economic globalization, as an important platform of multilateral free trade, no country can be separated from its development. We should understand the impact of WTO on national economic sovereignty and security. It is also necessary to understand the coordination between the WTO system and the principle of national economic sovereignty, and make full use of the WTO rules to safeguard the security of economic sovereignty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊安娜;劉沖;;對(duì)外貿(mào)易中我國產(chǎn)業(yè)的安全維護(hù)[J];發(fā)展研究;2008年02期

2 萬怡挺;馬建平;;WTO多哈回合貿(mào)易與環(huán)境談判回顧與展望[J];環(huán)境與可持續(xù)發(fā)展;2011年03期

3 馬方方;;對(duì)外開放戰(zhàn)略視域下中國國家經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)安全探討[J];和平與發(fā)展;2011年05期

4 鄭寶華;李東;;國內(nèi)農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)安全問題研究綜述[J];農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2008年01期

5 蔡高強(qiáng);鄒光明;;論WTO規(guī)則與過渡期后的國內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)保護(hù)[J];前沿;2007年08期

6 廖凡;;經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化與國際經(jīng)濟(jì)法的新趨勢(shì)——兼論我國的回應(yīng)與對(duì)策[J];清華法學(xué);2009年06期

7 吳凡;劉基宏;;國際貿(mào)易自由化對(duì)環(huán)境保護(hù)的不良影響[J];曲靖師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

8 徐開金;經(jīng)濟(jì)安全:基于經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)角度的研究[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)研究;2003年02期

9 龔柏華;;中國入世十年主動(dòng)參與WTO爭端解決機(jī)制實(shí)踐述評(píng)[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動(dòng)態(tài)與研究;2011年05期

10 田曉萍;;WTO視野下的國家經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)[J];社科縱橫;2008年08期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 萬怡挺;[N];中國國門時(shí)報(bào);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 張璇;全球化背景下的發(fā)展中國家經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)研究[D];西北師范大學(xué);2011年

2 陶云剛;WTO保障措施制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2003年

3 李向京;WTO例外條款與國家經(jīng)濟(jì)安全問題研究[D];國防科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué);2003年

4 劉夢(mèng)菊;WTO例外規(guī)則研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2004年

5 周小飛;WTO環(huán)境規(guī)則研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2007年

6 吳靜媛;經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化下的國家經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2007年

7 高芳;論中國農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)安全保障法律體系的構(gòu)建[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2008年

8 胡茵;WTO多邊貿(mào)易體制對(duì)發(fā)展中國家產(chǎn)業(yè)安全的影響及其對(duì)策分析[D];東北師范大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1536478