本文選題：反傾銷 + 反補(bǔ)貼�。� 參考：《中國政法大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來美國頻繁對(duì)華實(shí)施反傾銷反補(bǔ)貼合并調(diào)查。在論證其非法性和對(duì)國際公平競(jìng)爭秩序破壞的同時(shí),試圖以此為契機(jī),引導(dǎo)我國政府和企業(yè)尋找應(yīng)對(duì)雙反調(diào)查、維護(hù)自身權(quán)益的策略,進(jìn)而完善我國維護(hù)國際公平競(jìng)爭秩序的相關(guān)法制建設(shè)。通過對(duì)WTO相關(guān)法規(guī)的解讀,領(lǐng)會(huì)國際立法維護(hù)公平競(jìng)爭秩序的主旨。我國正遵從這一立法精神,不斷完善相關(guān)法律制度建設(shè),在維護(hù)國內(nèi)企業(yè)的合法權(quán)益和恢復(fù)良好的國際競(jìng)爭秩序上,發(fā)揮日趨重要的作用。 文章主要分為以下幾個(gè)部分: 第一章通過概括列舉美對(duì)華雙反調(diào)查的案例、結(jié)合相關(guān)法律條文的引用和法理分析,論證了實(shí)施雙反調(diào)查的非法性。雙反調(diào)查超出了其對(duì)國內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)受到的實(shí)質(zhì)性損害補(bǔ)償?shù)南薅?對(duì)我國的出口貿(mào)易造成了損害。雙反調(diào)查是對(duì)國際公平競(jìng)爭秩序的違反。 第二章通過簡要引用經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)理論結(jié)合相關(guān)法律規(guī)定的分析,說明雙重計(jì)稅的方法和“非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)國家”地位的認(rèn)定,是我國對(duì)美貿(mào)易中遭受不公平對(duì)待的基礎(chǔ)。 第三章以《SCM協(xié)議》和GATS為例,通過解讀其中關(guān)于競(jìng)爭秩序的相關(guān)條款,了解到國際社會(huì)如何通過立法維護(hù)公平的國際競(jìng)爭環(huán)境。揭示了WTO相關(guān)法律維護(hù)國際公平競(jìng)爭秩序的立法精神,提出我國立法上的欠缺及完善競(jìng)爭立法的必要。 第四章簡要介紹美國立法保護(hù)本國利益的做法,對(duì)比說明了我國是如何維護(hù)公平的國際競(jìng)爭秩序的。文章從政府、企業(yè)行會(huì)和企業(yè)本身的角度出發(fā),分別論述應(yīng)當(dāng)如何維護(hù)競(jìng)爭秩序。結(jié)合我國的實(shí)際情況,大量引用數(shù)據(jù)和事實(shí),著重闡述我國應(yīng)如何從競(jìng)爭法制綜合建設(shè)的角度完善立法,力爭使法律與政策、制度相互協(xié)調(diào),建立公平的國際競(jìng)爭秩序。 結(jié)語:總結(jié)前文,提出新的國際形勢(shì)下對(duì)我國對(duì)外貿(mào)易的展望。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the United States has frequently carried out anti-dumping and anti-subsidy merger investigations against China. While demonstrating its illegality and destroying the international fair competition order, this paper tries to take this opportunity to guide our government and enterprises to find strategies to deal with the double counter investigation and safeguard their own rights and interests. Then perfect our country to maintain the international fair competition order related legal system construction. Through the interpretation of WTO laws and regulations, we can understand the purport of international legislation to maintain fair competition order. Our country is complying with this legislative spirit, perfecting the construction of relevant legal system, and playing an increasingly important role in safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of domestic enterprises and restoring a good international competition order. The article is mainly divided into the following parts: the first chapter demonstrates the illegality of carrying out double counter investigation by summarizing and enumerating the cases of American double counter investigation in China, combining with the citation and legal theory analysis of relevant legal provisions. The double-counter investigation exceeds the limit of compensation for the material damage to the domestic industry and damages the export trade of our country. The double-counter investigation is a violation of the international fair competition order. In the second chapter, by briefly quoting the economic theory and analyzing the relevant laws and regulations, the author explains that the method of double taxation and the recognition of the status of "non-market economy country" are the basis of unfair treatment in China's trade with the United States. The third chapter takes SCM and GATS as an example to understand how the international community maintains a fair international competition environment through legislation. This paper reveals the legislative spirit of WTO related laws to maintain the international fair competition order, and points out the lack of legislation in our country and the necessity of perfecting the competition legislation. The fourth chapter briefly introduces American legislation to protect its own interests, and compares how China maintains a fair international competition order. This paper discusses how to maintain the competition order from the angle of government, enterprise guild and enterprise itself. According to the actual situation of our country, citing a large number of data and facts, this paper emphatically expounds how our country should perfect the legislation from the angle of comprehensive construction of competition legal system, strive to make the law, policy and system coordinate with each other, and establish a fair international competition order. Conclusion: summing up the previous article and putting forward the prospect of China's foreign trade under the new international situation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1;D922.295;D971.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐崇利;;國際經(jīng)濟(jì)法律秩序與中國的“和平崛起”戰(zhàn)略——以國際關(guān)系理論分析的視角[J];比較法研究;2005年06期

2 李寶君;WTO與我國反傾銷策略[J];商業(yè)研究;2003年22期

3 曾慶春,鞏愛凌;中國企業(yè)反傾銷應(yīng)訴之道[J];商業(yè)研究;2004年05期

4 張寶均;傾銷與反傾銷的博弈論分析[J];商業(yè)研究;2004年08期

5 李本;WTO《補(bǔ)貼與反補(bǔ)貼協(xié)議》對(duì)內(nèi)國經(jīng)濟(jì)法的約束與影響[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年06期

6 樊勇明;賀平;;中國是多邊貿(mào)易體制的積極建設(shè)者[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年06期

7 李建;;論反傾銷中損害確定的隨意性及其抑制[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年01期

8 李仲平;李煉;;國際對(duì)華反補(bǔ)貼的可行性法律分析[J];佛山科學(xué)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期

9 臧立;;WTO法律體系下實(shí)施“雙反”措施的合法性研究——由“美國對(duì)華銅版紙案”引發(fā)的思考[J];法商研究;2008年01期

10 付榮;;反傾銷立法中的實(shí)質(zhì)性阻礙損害標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 趙生祥;貿(mào)易救濟(jì)制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 彭爾霞;中外反傾銷立法之比較研究[D];哈爾濱工程大學(xué);2005年

2 楊哲;入世后中美貿(mào)易摩擦的原因、影響及對(duì)策分析[D];上海外國語大學(xué);2006年

3 王成欣;我國出口商品面臨的反補(bǔ)貼調(diào)查新形勢(shì)與應(yīng)對(duì)策略[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2042274