本文選題：反傾銷 + WTO貿(mào)易爭端解決機制　； 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 作為中國最大的貿(mào)易伙伴,歐盟與中國經(jīng)濟交往的過程中,為了保護其成員國的利益,頻繁對中國商品發(fā)起反傾銷調(diào)查。本文以歐盟對華皮鞋征收反傾銷稅案為例,以歐盟對中國產(chǎn)皮鞋繼續(xù)延長征收懲罰性關(guān)稅15個月,及中國將歐盟訴諸于世界貿(mào)易組織,以謀求WTO貿(mào)易爭端解決機制的現(xiàn)實為背景,詳細(xì)敘述了在《歐盟反傾銷條例》規(guī)定下,歐盟對中國產(chǎn)皮鞋構(gòu)成傾銷的認(rèn)定過程。同時,筆者站在中方的立場提出在WTO貿(mào)易爭端解決機制下,雙方有可能存在的爭議焦點。最后,筆者對中國皮鞋業(yè)遭受反傾銷調(diào)查的原因進行分析,并且提出了幾點應(yīng)當(dāng)注意的問題和規(guī)避的措施,以供參考。
[Abstract]:As China's largest trading partner, the European Union has frequently launched anti-dumping investigations on Chinese goods in order to protect the interests of its member countries in the course of economic exchanges between the EU and China. This paper takes the case of anti-dumping duty imposed by the European Union on Chinese leather shoes as an example, taking the imposition of punitive duties on Chinese leather shoes by the European Union for 15 months and China's recourse to the World Trade Organization. Based on the reality of the WTO trade dispute settlement mechanism, this paper describes in detail the process of the EU's determination of the dumping of leather shoes made in China under the provisions of the EU Anti-dumping regulations. At the same time, the author puts forward the possible dispute focus under the WTO trade dispute settlement mechanism. Finally, the author analyzes the causes of the anti-dumping investigation against the leather and footwear industry in China, and puts forward some problems that should be paid attention to and measures to be taken to avoid them for reference.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D920.5

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 項思麗;歐盟反傾銷法中的非市場經(jīng)濟規(guī)則研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1900957