本文選題：較大的市　切入點：政府規(guī)章　出處：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：“較大的市”不僅是一類城市,而且是被賦予法律意義的法律概念,其有不同于一般城市的特點�；诔鞘邪l(fā)展的特殊需要,中央賦予“較大的市”法規(guī)和規(guī)章的立法權(quán),以期實現(xiàn)“較大的市”法治化管理的目標。然而,由于其效力層級較低,城市立法資源有限,因此,其立法質(zhì)量不高。民主科學(xué)的立法程序是保障立法質(zhì)量,實現(xiàn)立法正義的重要方法。為此,國務(wù)院于2001年出臺了《規(guī)章制定程序條例》以規(guī)范規(guī)章的制定程序�！拜^大的市”為執(zhí)行這一行政法規(guī)紛紛結(jié)合本地實際制定符合本地需要的規(guī)章制定程序規(guī)范。目前,“較大的市”政府規(guī)章立法程序多數(shù)是對上位法的重復(fù)立法,其針對性和操作性不強,也不能滿足“較大的市”政府規(guī)章立法的特殊需求。因此,本文旨在對現(xiàn)有“較大的市”政府規(guī)章立法程序進行完善,使其成為能滿足“較大的市”政府規(guī)章立法民主與效率的好程序。 本文首先通過比較“較大的市”政府規(guī)章立法與其地方性法規(guī)立法、其規(guī)范性文件立法以及省政府規(guī)章立法在實體和程序上的不同,肯定了“較大的市”政府規(guī)章立法程序存在的必要性。在此基礎(chǔ)上,歸納出現(xiàn)有“較大的市”政府規(guī)章立法程序在立項、起草、審查、決定與公布、備案與解釋程序中存在的問題,尤其是從“較大的市”政府規(guī)章的特點出發(fā),否定了現(xiàn)有解釋程序存在的必要性。最后,針對“較大的市”政府規(guī)章存在的問題,提出對于其的完善一方面,要對現(xiàn)有較為概括的立法程序進一步細化,使其具有更強的可操作性；另一方面,要根據(jù)所制定規(guī)章的類型和具體內(nèi)容重要性的不同,在原有程序的基礎(chǔ)上,有選擇的適用寬嚴不同的程序。具體來說,對于一般性的規(guī)章,主要是一般性的創(chuàng)制性規(guī)章和執(zhí)行性規(guī)章,應(yīng)當適用較為寬松的程序,即立項、起草、審查、決定與公布和備案監(jiān)督程序,這里的備案監(jiān)督程序是備案為主的多元監(jiān)督程序；對于“特殊”的規(guī)章,主要是內(nèi)容涉及到市民基本權(quán)利的創(chuàng)制性規(guī)章和城市重大公共事務(wù)的規(guī)章,應(yīng)當在較為寬松的程序基礎(chǔ)上,選擇適用個別立法程序。主要包括在立項階段的立項論證程序、審查階段的聽證程序、備案監(jiān)督階段的事前外部批準程序。寬嚴相濟的程序設(shè)置使“較大的市”政府規(guī)章制定既符合其立法的民主性要求,也滿足其立法的效率需求,最終實現(xiàn)運用立法程序規(guī)范其規(guī)章制定的目的。
[Abstract]:The "larger city" is not only a kind of city, but also a legal concept with legal significance, which is different from other cities.Based on the special needs of urban development, the central government has given the legislative power to the laws and regulations of "larger cities" in order to achieve the goal of "larger cities" being governed by law.However, due to its low level of effectiveness and limited urban legislative resources, the quality of its legislation is not high.The democratic and scientific legislative procedure is an important method to guarantee the legislative quality and realize the legislative justice.To this end, the State Council in 2001 issued the regulations to regulate the formulation of regulations.In order to carry out this administrative law, the "larger cities" have made local rules and regulations that meet the local needs.At present, most of the legislative procedures of government regulations in "larger cities" are repeated legislation of superior laws, and their pertinence and maneuverability are not strong, nor can they meet the special needs of "larger cities" government regulations and legislations.Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to perfect the existing "larger city" government regulation legislative procedure, and make it a good procedure to satisfy the "larger city" government regulation legislation democracy and efficiency.First of all, this paper compares the entity and procedure difference between the government regulation legislation of "larger city" and its local regulation legislation, its normative document legislation and provincial government regulation legislation.It affirms the necessity of the legislative procedure of the government rules and regulations of the "larger city".On this basis, there are some problems in the process of establishing, drafting, examining, deciding and publicizing, filing and interpreting the government rules and regulations of "larger cities", especially from the characteristics of the government regulations of "larger cities".It negates the necessity of existing explanation procedure.Finally, in view of the problems existing in the government regulations of "larger cities", it is proposed that, on the one hand, the existing more general legislative procedures should be further refined to make them more operable; on the other hand,According to the different types of rules and specific content of the importance of the different, on the basis of the original procedures, selective application of different procedures.Specifically, for the general regulations, mainly the general creative and executive regulations, a more relaxed procedure shall be applied, that is, the procedures for establishing a project, drafting, examining, deciding on and making public, and filing for the record,The record keeping supervision procedure here is a pluralistic supervision procedure based on filing. For "special" regulations, they mainly concern the creation of regulations concerning the basic rights of citizens and the regulations on major public affairs of the city.Individual legislative procedures should be applied on the basis of looser procedures.It mainly includes the procedure of project approval in the stage of project establishment, the procedure of hearing in the stage of examination, and the procedure of external prior approval in the stage of filing and supervising.The procedure of combining leniency and severity makes the government regulations of "larger city" not only accord with the democratic requirements of its legislation, but also meet the needs of its legislative efficiency, and finally realize the purpose of using the legislative procedure to standardize its rules and regulations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D920.0;D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 喻少如;湯沛豐;;公眾參與行政立法的民主性探討[J];長沙理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年04期

2 唐芬;劉永紅;;“較大的市”及其立法權(quán)探析[J];西華師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2009年06期

3 肖子策;論地方立法起草方式改革[J];法學(xué);2005年01期

4 李兵;關(guān)于劃定具有立法權(quán)的“較大的市”的思考[J];法學(xué);2005年09期

5 李春燕;;規(guī)章制定程序中社會公眾網(wǎng)絡(luò)參與情況之實證分析與思考——以杭州市為例[J];法治研究;2007年06期

6 張志城;馬太建;;關(guān)于地方性規(guī)章中若干問題的探討[J];法律學(xué)習(xí)與研究;1990年05期

7 李宏宇;吳顯亮;;對我國行政立法監(jiān)督程序的思考[J];黑龍江生態(tài)工程職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年06期

8 陳光;于海亭;;較大的市立法的制度變遷及其改進[J];中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年01期

9 鄭磊;;“較大的市”的權(quán)限有多大——基于憲法文本的考察[J];國家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年01期

10 羅曉華;郭正林;;參與式民主的實現(xiàn)形式——直接民主與間接民主在地方自治范圍內(nèi)的結(jié)合[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2007年10期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張馨元;“較大的市”地方性法規(guī)的立法空間及趨勢研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2010年

2 朱清源;較大的市的立法權(quán)研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

3 戴偉;論行政立法程序的民主化[D];南京師范大學(xué);2006年

4 韋愛華;地方政府規(guī)章立法程序研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1714326